All I've seen so far is you accepting the 'facts' from Harvard. A classic case of them acting as both judge and jury. As far as I can see the harassment amounted to a few off colour remarks he may or may not have made to young black female students working in his lab. For that they shut down his lab permanently and excluded him from the University for two years without salary. To my mind, and many others, this is a classic case of cancelling on the back of the #MeToo hysteria in 2018.
How about you actually look at some real facts presented in this video by the likes of prof. Glen Loury and Tanaya Devi? Can you be objective enough to do that and not be so quick to pass judgement?