Full Text of Leftist Psycho Incel Cole Allen's "Manifesto"
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
tigerred59
Verified User
LOL, the only thing clean in my house is the ceilings...to high to reach and fuck up I suppose.
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
Not directly, because of the ignore feature. I can get the gist of it from his absurd buzzword-laden title and your responses to him. Grokey has always been a cranky kook. He falls back on petty responses pretty often. It seems he hasn't changed much since I put him on ignore a few years back.
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
Trying to debate him is like arguing with a foul‑mouthed toddler. All noise, no comprehension, and zero connection to the actual point. I make an argument, he throws a tantrum.
Not that you are rational, but what makes this person an "incel?"The leftist psycho incel soun ds like most of the leftists at JPP, and like multiple elected Treason-o-crat elected officials.
This is from WEAR TV, via ABC news :
Read the manifesto in full:
Hello everybody!
So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.
I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for “Most Wanted.”
I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)
I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.
I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.
I don’t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.
On to why I did any of this:
I am a citizen of the United States of America.
What my representatives do reflects on me.
And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.
(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)
While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)
I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.
Rebuttals to objections:
Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.
Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.
Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes.
Follow the latest on the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner:
The security loopholes that allowed Cole Allen to get near White House Correspondents’ Dinner — as Trump says this proves need for his ballroom
Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.
Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn’t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be “inconvenient” for people who aren’t the victim?
This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.
Objection 3: You didn’t get them all.
Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.
Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn’t be the one doing this.
Rebuttal: I don’t see anyone else picking up the slack
Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.
Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.
I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.)
Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.
Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.
Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.
Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.
Thank you to the many acquaintances I’ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.
Thank you all for everything.
Sincerely,
Cole “coldForce” “Friendly Federal Assassin” Allen
PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.
Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.
What I got (who knows, maybe they’re pranking me!) is nothing.
No damn security. Not in transport. Not in the hotel. Not in the event.
Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.
I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.
The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.
Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it’s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.
Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit.
Actually insane.
Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it’s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.
'Friendly federal assassin': Read accused gunman's manifesto sent before dinner attack
Allen is facing multiple federal charges.weartv.com
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
Yep, he hasn't changed one bit.
What's funny is how you and the other leftdrones keep ignoring the psycho incel's actual words, while pretending you're wining something.
And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.
(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)
While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)
I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.
Here's some AI; maybe you'll read this. Are you seriously claiming Allen is not z leftist ???
Based on reports following the April 2026 White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting incident, Cole Allen has been described as having ties to left-wing, anti-Trump, and radical political ideologies.
New York Post +2- Political Affiliation: Reports indicate Allen was involved in left-wing activism in Los Angeles and, according to his sister, often discussed "radical" ideas.
- Anti-Trump Stance: He was an active user of the social media platform Blue Sky, where he reportedly made over 1,000 posts criticizing President Trump and Republicans.
- "The Wide Awakes" Link: Law enforcement has investigated his links to "The Wide Awakes," described in reports as a leftist/progressive group.
- "No Kings" March: Allen participated in the nationwide anti-Trump "No Kings" march.
- Donation History: Federal records show a $25 donation in October 2024 to a political action committee supporting Kamala Harris.
- Manifesto: He reportedly sent an anti-Trump manifesto to his family shortly before the attack.
New York Post +4
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
You keep acting like pasting a stack of headlines somehow proves your point. The reporting is real, investigators looked at his posts, his protest activity, his donation history, and the manifesto. Nobody’s disputing that.Here's some AI; maybe you'll read this. Are you seriously claiming Allen is not z leftist ???
Based on reports following the April 2026 White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting incident, Cole Allen has been described as having ties to left-wing, anti-Trump, and radical political ideologies.
View attachment 82274New York Post +2
- Political Affiliation: Reports indicate Allen was involved in left-wing activism in Los Angeles and, according to his sister, often discussed "radical" ideas.
- Anti-Trump Stance: He was an active user of the social media platform Blue Sky, where he reportedly made over 1,000 posts criticizing President Trump and Republicans.
- "The Wide Awakes" Link: Law enforcement has investigated his links to "The Wide Awakes," described in reports as a leftist/progressive group.
- "No Kings" March: Allen participated in the nationwide anti-Trump "No Kings" march.
- Donation History: Federal records show a $25 donation in October 2024 to a political action committee supporting Kamala Harris.
- Manifesto: He reportedly sent an anti-Trump manifesto to his family shortly before the attack.
View attachment 82275New York Post +4
What you’re doing is pretending that repeating LEFTIST!! over and over turns media framing into an official conclusion. It doesn’t. The outlets you’re quoting are describing what was reported, not handing you the ideological label you’re desperate to force onto it.
If you want to argue the facts, stick to the facts. If all you’ve got is emojis and volume, you’re just proving my original point.
Reading comp troubles?
I posted the leftist violent incel Cole's own, unedited words; you, apparently have comprehension troubles.
I also posted an AI ( your favorite) report detailing his decidedly leftist political history.
Allen's own words +an AI report.
Once again: are you claiming that Allen is NOT A LEFTIST ??
Last edited:
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
One more time ...
What the evidence actually shows
Here’s what is confirmed across multiple sources:- Anti‑Trump and anti‑Christian rhetoric was found on his social media.
- He targeted Trump administration officials, according to law enforcement statements.
- He left a manifesto outlining his intent to attack Trump administration officials.
- He made a $25 donation to a PAC supporting Kamala Harris.
What is
No law enforcement source has officially stated:- that Allen was a leftist,
- that he belonged to a left‑wing extremist organization, or
- that his motive was ideologically left‑wing in a formal sense.
This means the “leftist” label is media framing, not an investigative conclusion.
Why the label is contested
Right‑leaning outlets (e.g., NY Post, Fox News) emphasize:- anti‑Trump posts
- anti‑Christian rhetoric
- donation to a Democratic PAC
- participation in anti‑Trump activism
Mainstream and neutral outlets (CBS, NPR, CNBC) report the same facts without assigning an ideological label.
Bottom line
You can factually say:- Allen expressed anti‑Trump views.
- Allen targeted Trump administration officials.
- Allen participated in anti‑Trump activism.
- Allen donated to a Democratic‑aligned PAC.
- “The FBI confirmed he was a leftist.” (They haven’t.)
- “His motive was officially left‑wing.” (Not established.)
You didn't answer the question...you just posted some more I bullshit (which, BTW,absolutely proves Allen is a leftist).One more time ...
Here’s what is confirmed across multiple sources:
These are factual, documented elements.
- Anti‑Trump and anti‑Christian rhetoric was found on his social media.
- He targeted Trump administration officials, according to law enforcement statements.
- He left a manifesto outlining his intent to attack Trump administration officials.
- He made a $25 donation to a PAC supporting Kamala Harris.
No law enforcement source has officially stated:
Former President Obama even stated that the motive remains unclear despite the manifesto.
- that Allen was a leftist,
- that he belonged to a left‑wing extremist organization, or
- that his motive was ideologically left‑wing in a formal sense.
This means the “leftist” label is media framing, not an investigative conclusion.
Right‑leaning outlets (e.g., NY Post, Fox News) emphasize:
These facts are real — but the interpretation (“leftist”) is theirs, not the FBI’s.
- anti‑Trump posts
- anti‑Christian rhetoric
- donation to a Democratic PAC
- participation in anti‑Trump activism
Mainstream and neutral outlets (CBS, NPR, CNBC) report the same facts without assigning an ideological label.
You can factually say:
You cannot factually say:
- Allen expressed anti‑Trump views.
- Allen targeted Trump administration officials.
- Allen participated in anti‑Trump activism.
- Allen donated to a Democratic‑aligned PAC.
The “leftist” label is media interpretation, not an official designation.
- “The FBI confirmed he was a leftist.” (They haven’t.)
- “His motive was officially left‑wing.” (Not established.)
You're just playing silliass ,leftist Word Dance.
ONCE AGAIN, ANSWER THE QUESTION: YOU ARE CLAIMING THAT ALLEN IS NOT A LEFTIST?
You are in an extreme minority. 70% of Americans hate Trump.
Cole Allen, the suspect in the 2026 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner shooting, was identified by his sister as a member of "The Wide Awakes," a group with roots in 19th-century Connecticut. He also reportedly identified himself as a "Friendly Federal Assassin" in writings.
CT Insider +2
CT Insider +2- Group Affiliation: Allen's sister told the Secret Service that he was part of "The Wide Awakes," a group known for recent anti-Trump protests, according to CT Insider and NBC News.
- Ideology: He frequently made "radical statements," railed against President Trump and Republicans on social media, and was involved in "No Kings" marches in March 2026.
- Incident Details: WBAL-TV reports he sent a manifesto just prior to the attack, which officials are investigating as politically motivated.
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
You cannot factually say:
- “The FBI confirmed he was a leftist.” (They haven’t.)
- “His motive was officially left‑wing.” (Not established.)
31 year old violent , psycho, incel leftist STILL LIVED WITH HIS PARENTS...IOW: TYPICAL LEFTIST.
He'll be getting his ?"own place" ( bunk) from here out....
He'll be getting his ?"own place" ( bunk) from here out....
More silliass Word Games....BECAUSE YOU CANNOT ANSWER THE QUESTION, W/O LOOKING LIKE A DUNCE.
I can say that he's leftist based on ALL AVILABLE INFORMATION, because I can apply logical deduction/linear thought...unlike you.
I don't need the FBI to tell me this.
ONCE AGAIN, ANSWER THE QUESTION: ARE YOU CLAIMING ALLAN IS NOT A LEFTIST ??
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
You’re confusing I feel like it’s true with I can factually state it.
Let’s review, slowly:
You: “I can say he’s a leftist based on ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION.”
Reality: No official confirmation of his politics, no established motive, no primary-source admission.
That’s not logical deduction, that’s you reverse‑engineering reality from your preferred conclusion.
To your shouted question:
I’m saying this: I’m not claiming he is or isn’t. I’m saying you don’t have the evidence to state it as fact, and you keep trying to dodge that by yelling word games.
If you want to believe it, knock yourself out. Just stop pretending your belief is evidence.
No; I m asking you to make your point, or STFU.
I absolutely have the evidence to state that he is....your inability to apply informed judgement is not my problem.
You are fooling only yourself with your "little dance", to desperately keep from answering the question that shoots down your entire, silliass bullshit deflection.
It's funny to watch.
