First day of hearings is over.....

Bye. So nothing specifically that you heard will convict Trump of …. something , .

So now the goal posts have been moved all the way back to having Trump convicted? Sad for his supporters if that is how far back they have had to retreat.
 
a partisan hearing isn't a court hearing numb nuts.

Some of the charges like "parading" or "Use of a recording device" are not worth anything but probation.
The few at the top are getting the book thrown them - one guy committed suicide because he was raided by the FBI who contained the whole block to arrest him. He did nothing but "parade"

Those who were violent can have the book thrown at them for all I care
But this isn't about anything but desperately throwing shit against the wall in hopes it sticks
It's really all the dems have

Partisan? Looked to me like Liz Cheney presented most of it... She is a Republican.
 
a partisan hearing isn't a court hearing numb nuts.

Some of the charges like "parading" or "Use of a recording device" are not worth anything but probation.
The few at the top are getting the book thrown them - one guy committed suicide because he was raided by the FBI who contained the whole block to arrest him. He did nothing but "parade"

Those who were violent can have the book thrown at them for all I care
But this isn't about anything but desperately throwing shit against the wall in hopes it sticks
It's really all the dems have

Ivanka and Bill Barr provided the bombshells... Oh and Mark Meadows.
 
What difference does it make? Nobody’s posted a thing that would so much as indict, much convict anyone of anything.
Trump lied.
Trump said Pence should be hanged.
Ivanka said trump lost.
Trump asked to find fraud.
We’ve known this for well over a year. And now he’s going to jail ? What law exactly was broken?

They provided evidence that a reasonable person in Trumps position would know he lost.
They provided evidence that despite that Trump made efforts to get people to lie about the result.
They provided evidence that Trump, despite having lost, made an attempt to stay in power.
They provided evidence that Trump encouraged a disruption of the certification of votes.
They Provided evidence that Trump tried to put together a slate of electors that would lie and say he won their respective states.
They Provided evidence that despite having the power to do so, Trump refused to stop the violence for several hours.

That adds up to several Federal Crimes. And it was only the first of 5 presentations.
 
I think the major reason Fox didn't air it is because Sean Hannity was one of the "stars" discussed in the presentation. His Tweets to Meadows begging him to get the pig to stop.

Can you believe fat donny sat and watched the carnage for 3 hours ignoring pleas to make it stop, not only that was quoted as saying, in response to the calls to hang Pence.. twump says, "Maybe Mike deserves it!".

Wow. That turd was our PRESIDENT! How embarrassing this was for America.

Hannity got EXPOSED for the creep he is, and Fox has a lot invested in him.
 
Many disagree with your simple minded assessment.

the dems bragged about saving democracy through ballot stuffing in a famous time article.

did you read it?

I know many disagree, we have a lot of people in this nation who are unintelligent and then another group who are too weak to ever admit reality when it conflicts with what they wanted.
 
I know many disagree, we have a lot of people in this nation who are unintelligent and then another group who are too weak to ever admit reality when it conflicts with what they wanted.

your ad hominem attacks are just that. ad hominem attacks.

the corrupt judiciary has gotten this one wrong, consistently, due to massive corruption.
 
Partisan? Looked to me like Liz Cheney presented most of it... She is a Republican.

LOL. One of two hand selected folks who are assured to say and do exactly what Pelosi wanted them to say and do on this subject. Pretending that folks that had other opinions were not removed form the propaganda committee doesn't change that these propaganda "hearings" are not even close to an attempt to find any truth on this subject.

We already know what Cheney is going to say, we've heard it before, we've been talking about it the last 1.5 years. Pretending that this committee is "bi-partisan" when appointees were rejected for having a different opinion than the Speaker is just pretense. We get that lawyers pretty much have to do that for a living and that is why so many of our politicians are lawyers (practiced at pretending they are), we also get that you can't trust them to ever tell you the truth, as "ethics" have a different meaning and context to lawyers.
 
LOL. One of two hand selected folks who are assured to say and do exactly what Pelosi wanted them to say and do on this subject. Pretending that folks that had other opinions were not removed form the propaganda committee doesn't change that these propaganda "hearings" are not even close to an attempt to find any truth on this subject.

We already know what Cheney is going to say, we've heard it before, we've been talking about it the last 1.5 years. Pretending that this committee is "bi-partisan" when appointees were rejected for having a different opinion than the Speaker is just pretense. We get that lawyers pretty much have to do that for a living and that is why so many of our politicians are lawyers (practiced at pretending they are), we also get that you can't trust them to ever tell you the truth, as "ethics" have a different meaning and context to lawyers.
Oh, brother, you are way down the rabbit hole.
 
Oh, brother, you are way down the rabbit hole.

Says the person who thinks that "hearings" held by a select committee chosen (or rejected) individually and specifically by the partisan speaker of the house is not partisan.

The hole is the one the left is digging. I wonder when they'll realize they forgot to include an exit path.
 
Back
Top