You said "Christians teach women are subservient." Then, after two days of being schooled, you amended your comments to say "most Christians" teach this.... then, after another day of schooling and pwnage, you amended it to "some Christians" teach this. So it has been a metamorphosis with you, in another few days, you could be a radical bible-thumping Evangelist like Brent, there's really no telling, you change so quickly when challenged.
No, you initially equated "subservience" with a portion of scripture which used the word "submit" in a completely different context, when taken IN context, and WITH the rest of the passage, it is clear the intent is not to say that women are subservient or lesser in value, as you continued to try and claim. After days of pwnage you have retreated to the safety of root semantics, and relying on those understandings to save you. It doesn't change the fact you have been trounced in debate.
I've not denied you said them either, you said even more before, and your tone has changed over the course of this debate. I think maybe you learned something, but you are too proud to admit that here. You couldn't refute the counter arguments presented, you tried and failed to make your point, you abandoned your initial commentary and tried to spin what you originally said and the point you tried to make.
No, you were accused of saying the Christians teach women are subservient to men, because that is what you said. Then you made the direct comparison between Islam and Christianity, and inferred Christians treat women the same as Islam. You keep making incorrect and untrue statements, and when you are challenged, you try to morph your original statement into something more coherent. It's an indicator you need to think things through before you post.
And I don't blame you for that, I am pretty much a stickler for not being misquoted. Generally, I will admit that my comment was misunderstood and take responsibility for that, and then I will offer a clarification of what was meant. I never saw you do that, maybe you did and I missed it amid all the name-calling and sophomoric retorts? No one has misquoted you, what you said (in its context) was ignorant of fact, and you were called on it, then you changed what you said and claimed you meant something else, which you clearly didn't. You were apparently misunderstood because you said something stupid, and you should just own up to that and re-clarify what you wanted to say.
Yep, I am familiar with board features. This isn't about a direct quote you made, but the point you tried to make and failed to do so.
