Democrats pass idiotic assault weapon ban bill

Hawkeye10 said:
The baby formula situation is a great window in on what life under the rule of the Revolution is like, they could not/would not maintain supplies, they dont give a fuck about us.

Buckle Up.
Click to expand...

the sky isn't falling chicken little.

this so called revolution has already failed.

the hierarchy cannot be externalized.
 
Walt said:
That amounts to interstate commerce, which does not have to be paid for. Sorry.
Click to expand...

the constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce was LIMITED by the founders to that which is necessary and proper. The amount of torturous expanded power that you morons have lent to it now gives the federal government power over whether you can have a garage sale or force you to grow yellow roses in your front yard. why do you fucksticks want supreme federal power?
 
There are 368,190 live births in Texas per year, and usually there are 3 times as many pregnancies, so about a million pregnancies that could have been aborted, before Roe v. Wade was repealed. An abortion can cost about $1,000. So that means the Texas State Government must pay $1 billion to Planned Parenthood every year... Under Gardner's theory.

In the real world, the Constitution just does not work that way.
 
Walt said:
There are 368,190 live births in Texas per year, and usually there are 3 times as many pregnancies, so about a million pregnancies that could have been aborted, before Roe v. Wade was repealed. An abortion can cost about $1,000. So that means the Texas State Government must pay $1 billion to Planned Parenthood every year... Under Gardner's theory.

In the real world, the Constitution just does not work that way.
Click to expand...

Jesus Wally, what has this got to do with guns? Get your meds under control. You have had a really bad last two weeks.
As for the assault weapons ban, it has no meaning, the SC has already ruled on this and it will go nowhere.
 
Walt said:
There are 368,190 live births in Texas per year, and usually there are 3 times as many pregnancies, so about a million pregnancies that could have been aborted, before Roe v. Wade was repealed. An abortion can cost about $1,000. So that means the Texas State Government must pay $1 billion to Planned Parenthood every year... Under Gardner's theory.

In the real world, the Constitution just does not work that way.
Click to expand...

Jesus Wally, what has this got to do with guns? Get your meds under control. You have had a really bad last two weeks.
As for the assault weapons ban, it has no meaning, the SC has already ruled on this and it will go nowhere.
 
gemini104104 said:
You as a POS troll advocating seditious and un-American repukes and their NRA pimps passing a domestic terrorist bill of their own at obstructing gun control measures that has global implications back and forth just because you hate America and anything else of a civilized nature on Earth. One point you trolls should understand is that for one among other reasons the U.S cannot be invaded that it is packed with weapons double the size or more of its population among civilians and not to speak of what the U.S. military forces have at their disposal against both the internal and external enemies of the world.

Obviously foreign enemies were not interested in invading America but depended on a lawlessly hacked in piece of shit sewer creature tRump and his un-American team of deplorable of a shit show who are continually being hauled in to stand accountable at being set up to be fools among the tRump gutter mob of insurrection to destroy democracy from within at doing the bidding of foreign enemies and the devil. Based on events of the recent election that unlike 2016 was safe, secure and electoral college hacked proof and despite the war tRump, repukes and other swine engaged in that further effort to destroy another election in the devil's favor, torpedoed on their ass.

I trust the forces of a civilized nature against the internal and external enemy of the USofA and its allies, etc. against deplorable scum of the Earth and uncivilized savages that are incapable of either co-existing and supporting a civilized global society will continue to prevail.
Click to expand...

THAT is one of the finest examples of a lunatic, radical-Leftist rant I have seen in some time! Not a word of it makes a lick of sense. It's about as perfect a rambling pile of racial-Leftist gibberish as can be produced.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I can hear the sighs and imagine the eye rolling that title brought to many here, but it is accurate and not for the reason(s) those that would cheer it think.

The bill


https://news.yahoo.com/house-passes-assault-weapons-ban-012554705.html

It also bans magazines over 10 rounds in capacity.

Anyway, what makes this bill idiotic is the inclusion that someone now owning one or more of the weapons this bill bans is being prohibited from selling or transferring it. That amounts to a "taking." What that means is the government has effectively deprived that person of the value of that weapon. They can't sell it or give it to another family member for example. In effect, the government would have to pay each owner--and there are an estimated 12 million weapons included in this ban at an average value of about $1500 or say somewhere around $200 + billion in value of these weapons in the US.

A gun dealer with some of these weapons in stock would be prohibited from selling or transferring them to anyone. That is clearly a taking. Under eminent domain laws, the federal government would be obligated to pay the dealer in full for that loss. Private owners too.

So, the Democrats aren't just banning these weapons they are trying to confiscate them without having to compensate the owners. That won't fly, and only a complete retard in politics would try something so bald faced. Or, it is the Democrats trying absurd and obviously stupid political theater thinking that people will be angered by its not passing and take it out on Republicans.

Those that support such a move should be angered at the Democrats for political pandering rather than doing something effective, while those opposed to such a bill should be equally angered at Democrats for proposing such an idiotic and retarded blunder like this bill.
Click to expand...

During the Obama administration the Republican house passed a "repeal Obamacare act" symbolically only 50 times.

Sucks our collective dicks twumptard.
 
Jade Dragon said:
So idiotic it was enacted before and too great success. Ah, the days when the Columbine school shooting was unheard of. Now school shootings are dime a dozen.
Click to expand...

Yep, Uvalde should have ended the issue, but nope.. twumptards love them their guns over the lives of our kids.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
If I possess something of value, and the government suddenly makes a law making it illegal to sell, trade, or transfer that item to anyone else, they have taken the value of it. That falls under eminent domain and the government has to compensate me in full for that loss because they, and they alone caused it.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but you twump fucks are fine with government domain over a woman's body so fuck you!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
In effect, yes. If tomorrow the government passed a law that all ICE vehicles were banned from use on all roads would your inability to now use that vehicle for any practical purpose not be a taking? Would the owner of a gas station not be harmed by this law severely? This law is in essence a fig leaf for gun confiscation where those that passed it try to get around having to compensate the owners of those guns for their loss.

For example, let's say a gun dealer has 20 now banned rifles in his store. He certainly didn't intend them for personal use. He intended to sell them and make a profit from that. But now that he can't do that, he just lost the full investment he made in purchasing those rifles for future sales. The government took that value of those rifles from him and must compensate him for the loss under the constitution.

This is no different than if the government came along and told you, a property owner, that they were going to put some public good like an electric transmission line across your property and that you would lose the use of that portion of your property. The property is still yours, but you lost the use of that part of it. The government must compensate you for that loss.
Click to expand...

What if the government offered to buy them back?

Also you suck.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I can hear the sighs and imagine the eye rolling that title brought to many here, but it is accurate and not for the reason(s) those that would cheer it think.

The bill


https://news.yahoo.com/house-passes-assault-weapons-ban-012554705.html

It also bans magazines over 10 rounds in capacity.

Anyway, what makes this bill idiotic is the inclusion that someone now owning one or more of the weapons this bill bans is being prohibited from selling or transferring it. That amounts to a "taking." What that means is the government has effectively deprived that person of the value of that weapon. They can't sell it or give it to another family member for example. In effect, the government would have to pay each owner--and there are an estimated 12 million weapons included in this ban at an average value of about $1500 or say somewhere around $200 + billion in value of these weapons in the US.

A gun dealer with some of these weapons in stock would be prohibited from selling or transferring them to anyone. That is clearly a taking. Under eminent domain laws, the federal government would be obligated to pay the dealer in full for that loss. Private owners too.

So, the Democrats aren't just banning these weapons they are trying to confiscate them without having to compensate the owners. That won't fly, and only a complete retard in politics would try something so bald faced. Or, it is the Democrats trying absurd and obviously stupid political theater thinking that people will be angered by its not passing and take it out on Republicans.

Those that support such a move should be angered at the Democrats for political pandering rather than doing something effective, while those opposed to such a bill should be equally angered at Democrats for proposing such an idiotic and retarded blunder like this bill.
Click to expand...

This is bad. It must be defeated lest Civil War break out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top