Defying Obama, U.S. House passes tougher Syrian refugee screening

StormX

Banned
The U.S. House of Representatives, defying a veto threat by President Barack Obama, overwhelmingly passed Republican-backed legislation on Thursday to suspend Obama's program to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees in the next year and then intensify the process of screening them.


The measure, quickly drafted this week following the Islamic State attacks in Paris on Friday that killed 129 people, was approved on a vote of 289 to 137, with 47 of Obama's 188 fellow Democrats breaking with the White House to support it.


The vote came despite a last-ditch appeal for Democratic votes from Jeh Johnson, Obama's secretary of Homeland Security, and Denis McDonough, his chief of staff.


It followed a testy exchange between lawmakers and State Department official Anne Richard. Republicans responded with incredulity to her assertion at a House hearing that there is only a "very, very small" threat of any of the Syrian refugees being a "terrorist."


Some Republicans have asserted that some refugees could be militants bent on attacking the United States, noting reports that at least one Paris attacker may have slipped into Europe among migrants registered in Greece.

The bill, which would create the strictest U.S. screening ever of refugees from a war-torn nation, passed with the two-thirds majority that the House would need to override a presidential veto. It now goes to the Senate, also controlled by Republicans.


While many Americans see the United States historically as welcoming to immigrants, accepting refugees from Syria has raised concerns the newcomers may pose a national security threat in a country where about 3,000 people were killed by al Qaeda militants in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The measure passed on a 289-137 vote, representing a veto-proof majority. It now goes to the Senate. But 47 Democrats — in a significant rebuke of the administration — defected to support the bill, ignoring White House appeals to oppose it.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/19/us-paris-shooting-congress-idUSKCN0T82PG20151119



LOL


Suck it liberals...
 
Stricter laws work?

I thought there was supposed to be no point in passing stricter laws, because criminals won't obey them.



The measure will require that the secretary of homeland security, the director of the F.B.I. and the director of national intelligence personally certify that every refugee from Syria and Iraq seeking resettlement here is not a threat.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/19/op...f=opinion&_r=0
 
Stricter laws work?

I thought there was supposed to be no point in passing stricter laws, because criminals won't obey them.



The measure will require that the secretary of homeland security, the director of the F.B.I. and the director of national intelligence personally certify that every refugee from Syria and Iraq seeking resettlement here is not a threat.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/19/op...f=opinion&_r=0

This law doesn't pertain to criminals you fool.....this law is to constrain Obama's dangerous ideas and edicts he wants to institute.....it is a law to be followed by our government.

Just how stupid are you ?
 
This law doesn't pertain to criminals you fool.....this law is to constrain Obama's dangerous ideas and edicts he wants to institute.....it is a law to be followed by our government. Just how stupid are you ?

You don't consider Obama and Democrats to be criminals?

Poor BLABO.
 
Would it be as credible as your claim that the fear bill will allow screening to take place in 19-25 months?

I made no such claim.....I merely pointed out that if the Congress did in fact intend to make the screening process longer than it currently does it would have to be at least 19-25 months, because Obama has already committed to 18-24.......did you not read my post?......you should.....it would keep you from making embarrassing mistakes......
 
I made no such claim.....I merely pointed out that if the Congress did in fact intend to make the screening process longer than it currently does it would have to be at least 19-25 months, because Obama has already committed to 18-24.......did you not read my post?......you should.....it would keep you from making embarrassing mistakes......

So you say.

19-25 months is stricter.........
 
This law doesn't pertain to criminals you fool.....this law is to constrain Obama's dangerous ideas and edicts he wants to institute.....it is a law to be followed by our government.

Just how stupid are you ?

That's an interesting question. I'm not sure how to answer it.
 
Blubbering About Saving The World

" Blubbering About Saving The World "

* Yeah Sure Hardly Traitors Maybe Patriots *
They should be expelled from the party. People who support this are traitors to the United States.
Any would objectively agree that the torah directs aggression to establish the city state of israel , as israelism ; correct ?

Any who can read the qurayn should objectively agree in its direction for aggression to establish the city state of hejaz , as qurayshism ; correct ?

Now , whereas pundits for israelism consider the 613 mitzvot of the torah to be self incumbent upon themselves within israel alone , the pundits of fictional ishmaelism consider sharia of qurayshism from the qurayn to be incumbent upon all whether within hejaz or not and , consequently , the included directives for aggression cannot excised from its pretexts .

The US has a military and , while not all participate in it and some do not appreciate it , the ideology of fictional ishmaelism maintains a similar military expectation for itself with an additional stipulation , beyond that of US policy , which is to expand its ideology through aggression .

And , even though not all participate in it and some do not appreciate it ; militant expansionism cannot be excised from its doctrine of ideology and only the objective while ignorant pretend it and its history should be trivialized .

Whereas former ages witnessed the militant aggression in the form of standing armies , the ideology of salafism no sees infiltration as an alternative means to establish itself against the liberty and individualism of free peoples .
 
Back
Top