All Presidents are coerced into various things by their Party. Did you think he was a king or an emperor? If so, there’s two more words I have to teach you about…
Presidents might be coerced, but you have no knowledge this is one of those times.
It was obvious to me – it might not have been to you.
You made up the stuff about being coerced
“Made up” is your petulant description, based on your hurt feelings. Grownups call it “thinking”, so they would say, “You believe that stuff about being coerced…”
If you allege a lie it is up to you to prove it, and you haven’t done that. There are several possibilities:
1) The GOP forced Trump to make the statement, against his wishes.
2) Someone else forced him to make the statement against his wishes.
3) He told the truth.
4) He lied.
You picked number four. I picked number one. If you insist it’s four, prove it. Until you prove he lied he remains innocent of lying according to our basic rule of law.
to change the wording and then argue like it is fact.
What wording did I change? Use the quote function. It’s clear that the Party coerced Trump into saying what he said, for politically important and globally significant reasons, far overreaching any of your niggardly concerns. All political parties do this kind of thing from time to time. Trump doesn't run the GOP - it is a powerful machine that can control him when it wants to.
To lie there has to be intent to deceive. The only intent found here belongs to those forcing Trump to make his statement. “Force” removes intent, and when you are told you will lose your job, the most important job in the world, if you refuse to say a few trifling words, it is indeed coercion, or force. In those circumstances ANY POTUS would submit, and do as ordered. Trump may be headstrong and stubborn, but he isn’t a fool. The irony is that if he refused their command and
was sacked,
you would be criticizing him for not following GOP orders. You’d scoff, “What a loser! Can’t even take a simple order! [snicker, snort]”
and only you claimed he was coerced to change it. You cannot prove he did not lie by making up imaginary coercion.
It is up to you, the accuser, to do the proving. You obviously don’t understand logic or the rule of law, or even, for that matter, basic commonsense. Say I’m standing with you in a glass hothouse, inside which a simple apple tree grows. There are no apples on the ground and we stand with our backs to the tree. We hear the sound of an apple falling through the leaves to the ground, with a thump. As we turn we see the apple in question, still rolling to a stop. There is nobody there aside from us. Nobody could have shot the apple from the distance because the glass would break. I say, “Hmm. An apple fell from the tree.” Using your logic the conversation might go:
Flash: Er… you can’t say that.
Rob: Why not?
Flash: You made up the stuff about the apple dropping from the tree.
Rob: Made up? No, I deduced it. I drew a logical conclusion.
Flash: Nah. You just made it up. Did you see it drop?
Rob: No, but it’s clear that…
Flash: Ah hah! So you can’t really say it did, correct?
Rob: I’m using my brain to arrive at a determination.
Flash: Oh rea-hee-heee-eeally?
Rob: It’s called reasoning; thinking about something in a logical, sensible way.
Flash: Well how do you know it didn’t just appear out of thin air?
Rob: I cogitate and make judgments. My belief is that it didn’t.
Flash: That’s so yester-century. Don’t you know anything?
Rob: Yester-century, like when the Founders came up with your constitution?
Flash: Oh that – it’s just a bunch of made up stuff.
Rob: Made up? We call it thinking, innovating and writing.
Flash: Still made up though. Just a bunch of words.
Rob: DNA is just a bunch of nucleotides.
Flash: Anyway, you can’t say the apple fell from the tree.
Rob: If we didn’t make reasoned judgments we’d still be living in the trees.
Flash: So? Do you hate trees or something?
Rob: I’m sure the Fifth Column would love you.
Flash: Huh?