Boasberg, the Idiot District Court Judge, was also the Corrupt FISA Court Judge for the Russian Collusion Sedition.

Grokmaster

Grokmaster

Well-known member
Contributor
Yes, Judge James Boasberg was the Chief Judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) during the period when the "Russian Collusion" investigations (Crossfire Hurricane) were unfolding and the FISA applications for surveillance of individuals like Carter Page were being scrutinized.



This asshole should already be imprisoned over his seditious bullshit, as he continues to overstep his authority and undermine our duly- elected government.
 
Grokmaster said:
Yes, Judge James Boasberg was the Chief Judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) during the period when the "Russian Collusion" investigations (Crossfire Hurricane) were unfolding and the FISA applications for surveillance of individuals like Carter Page were being scrutinized.



This asshole should already be imprisoned over his seditious bullshit, as he continues to overstep his authority and undermine our duly- elected government.
Click to expand...
He is actually complicit in their conspiracy to violate Carter Page's civil rights..
 
Grokmaster said:
Yes, Judge James Boasberg was the Chief Judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) during the period when the "Russian Collusion" investigations (Crossfire Hurricane) were unfolding and the FISA applications for surveillance of individuals like Carter Page were being scrutinized.



This asshole should already be imprisoned over his seditious bullshit, as he continues to overstep his authority and undermine our duly- elected government.
Click to expand...
I know I would never get an answer, but have you ever read those actual FICA requests, the primary source? If you did, you wouldn’t be pedaling the Russian hoax bullshit
 
archives said:
I know I would never get an answer, but have you ever read those actual FICA requests, the primary source? If you did, you wouldn’t be pedaling the Russian hoax bullshit
Click to expand...
The FBI admitted they lied on the FISA requests., and knew that "The Dossier" was a crock of lies from the Clinton campaign.

The only "Russian hoax bullshit" is from you and yours.
 
Grokmaster said:
The FBI admitted they lied on the FISA requests., and knew that "The Dossier" was a crock of lies from the Clinton campaign.

The only "Russian hoax bullshit" is from you and yours.
Click to expand...
Again, you never read the primary sources, the often quoted dossier doesn’t even make an appearance till the last third of the petitions, added as supplemental material, wasn’t a big player

The IG and your own Durham report blow your innuendos up

And a few simple questions the “Russian hoax” uninformed can not answer is why did Junior, Paul, and Jared meet with Russians in Trump Tower? why did Manaford meet with Russians to exchange demographic data? why were their over 125 documented meetings between Russians and the Trump campaign?
 
archives said:
Again, you never read the primary sources, the often quoted dossier doesn’t even make an appearance till the last third of the petitions, added as supplemental material, wasn’t a big player

The IG and your own Durham report blow your innuendos up

And a few simple questions the “Russian hoax” uninformed can not answer is why did Junior, Paul, and Jared meet with Russians in Trump Tower? why did Manaford meet with Russians to exchange demographic data? why were their over 125 documented meetings between Russians and the Trump campaign?
Click to expand...
What has that to do with it being KNOWN TO BE LIES?

More lies; the dossier was a primary source for the FISA request.

Defend sedition much?
the Steele dossier played a "central and essential" role in the FBI's decision to seek and obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The dossier was also used in subsequent renewal applications.
However, multiple government reports and investigations later concluded that the FBI's use of the dossier involved significant problems:
  • Unverified Information: An internal Justice Department Inspector General (IG) report and the subsequent Durham report found that the FBI was unable to corroborate a single substantive allegation in the dossier. Much of the information was based on hearsay and rumor.
  • Omissions and Inaccuracies: The IG report identified 17 "significant inaccuracies and omissions" in the FBI's applications to the FISA court.
  • Source Credibility Issues: The FBI was aware of information that undermined the credibility of the dossier's primary sub-source, including that the individual had previously been the subject of a U.S. counterintelligence investigation as a potential Russian threat, but failed to inform the FISA court.
  • Political Motivation Undisclosed: The FBI did not fully disclose to the court that the dossier was commissioned as political opposition research, funded by a law firm for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
Ultimately, the special counsel John Durham's investigation concluded that the FBI lacked any "actual evidence of collusion" when it initiated its broader "Crossfire Hurricane" probe and relied heavily on the uncorroborated intelligence from the dossier to obtain the surveillance warrants.






It's just treason, that's all.

Boasberg (etal) should be in prison.

Lie some more.
 
Last edited:
Grokmaster said:
What has that to do with it being KNOWN TO BE LIES?

More lies; the dossier was a primary source for the FISA request.

Defend sedition much?
the Steele dossier played a "central and essential" role in the FBI's decision to seek and obtain a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The dossier was also used in subsequent renewal applications.
However, multiple government reports and investigations later concluded that the FBI's use of the dossier involved significant problems:
  • Unverified Information: An internal Justice Department Inspector General (IG) report and the subsequent Durham report found that the FBI was unable to corroborate a single substantive allegation in the dossier. Much of the information was based on hearsay and rumor.
  • Omissions and Inaccuracies: The IG report identified 17 "significant inaccuracies and omissions" in the FBI's applications to the FISA court.
  • Source Credibility Issues: The FBI was aware of information that undermined the credibility of the dossier's primary sub-source, including that the individual had previously been the subject of a U.S. counterintelligence investigation as a potential Russian threat, but failed to inform the FISA court.
  • Political Motivation Undisclosed: The FBI did not fully disclose to the court that the dossier was commissioned as political opposition research, funded by a law firm for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
Ultimately, the special counsel John Durham's investigation concluded that the FBI lacked any "actual evidence of collusion" when it initiated its broader "Crossfire Hurricane" probe and relied heavily on the uncorroborated intelligence from the dossier to obtain the surveillance warrants.






It's just treason, that's all.

Boasberg (etal) should be in prison.

Lie some more.
Click to expand...
And of course, no source
 
Grokmaster said:
Oh look ! It's Saul Alinsky, at its most desperate.


And. of course, no source....just madeup bullshit, per usual.

Mine is Google AI. Easily verifiable.



Where's yours?
Click to expand...
Saul Alinsky is dead

I don’t need a source, it’s your claim, and copying and pasting on line AI is not dependable, as Google itself states;

“Google's AI (AI Overviews) provides generally helpful, synthesized answers but isn't always perfectly accurate; it can generate errors, misunderstand context, or reflect flawed web data, so users must critically check its summaries against its linked sources, especially for important decisions, as the AI itself warns it may make mistakes.Accuracy varies, with some errors being absurd (like adding glue to pizza) or factually wrong (presidents' histories), highlighting the need to verify information from credible sources”
 
archives said:
Saul Alinsky is dead

I don’t need a source, it’s your claim, and copying and pasting on line AI is not dependable, as Google itself states;

“Google's AI (AI Overviews) provides generally helpful, synthesized answers but isn't always perfectly accurate; it can generate errors, misunderstand context, or reflect flawed web data, so users must critically check its summaries against its linked sources, especially for important decisions, as the AI itself warns it may make mistakes.Accuracy varies, with some errors being absurd (like adding glue to pizza) or factually wrong (presidents' histories), highlighting the need to verify information from credible source
Click to expand...
That was sarcasm, dullard. I provided my source.


You, on the other hand, made claims about the Russia sedition in posts # 8 & 109...no source, just your own madeup bullshit, per usual.
 
Grokmaster said:
That was sarcasm, dullard. I provided my source.


You, on the other hand, made claims about the Russia sedition in posts # 8 & 109...no source, just your own madeup bullshit, per usual.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Google AI, and as noted, “Google's AI (AI Overviews) provides generally helpful, synthesized answers but isn't always perfectly accurate; it can generate errors, misunderstand context, or reflect flawed web data, so users must critically check its summaries against its linked sources, especially for important decisions, as the AI itself warns it may make mistakes.Accuracy varies, with some errors being absurd (like adding glue to pizza) or factually wrong (presidents' histories), highlighting the need to verify information from credible source“
 
archives said:
Yeah, Google AI, and as noted, “Google's AI (AI Overviews) provides generally helpful, synthesized answers but isn't always perfectly accurate; it can generate errors, misunderstand context, or reflect flawed web data, so users must critically check its summaries against its linked sources, especially for important decisions, as the AI itself warns it may make mistakes.Accuracy varies, with some errors being absurd (like adding glue to pizza) or factually wrong (presidents' histories), highlighting the need to verify information from credible source“
Click to expand...
Awww...poor anchovies.l

Are you seriously still trying to claim that the Steele Dossier was not used to obtain FIAS warrants?

FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased​

Since it was disclosed last year that Steele’s dossier formed a central piece of evidence supporting the FISA warrant, Justice and FBI officials have been vague about exactly when they learned that Steele’s work was paid for by the law firm representing the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
 
Grokmaster said:
Oh look ! It's Saul Alinsky, at its most desperate.


And. of course, no source....just madeup bullshit, per usual.

Mine is Google AI. Easily verifiable.



Where's yours?
Click to expand...
This..I do not like.
Google filters the internet heavily. They've stepped into a doing harm/evil phase.
The internet would be a better place without Google in 2025.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top