Black ‘Mobs’ Attack White Patrons Outside Wis. State Fair

Thanks for admitting you didn't understand what I was saying.

I used to ask people what was going to happen when no one could afford to shop at Walmart anymore. This.

Incorrect, I was speaking of Onceler, not you. What you said was clear and I believe that you even lie to yourself when you say you "don't want it"... I think you want it, and that you take things that happen and try to make them fit with what you want to happen. You say you "don't know" why they attacked these people, you ignore evidence of those who were there and what they saw, and you try to make it fit into some class war you want desperately to happen.

I actually would believe Onceler when he says, "That isn't what I meant!"

You actually said that class wars were on the way, and are excited about it.
 
Incorrect, I was speaking of Onceler, not you. What you said was clear and I believe that you even lie to yourself when you say you "don't want it"... I think you want it, and that you take things that happen and try to make them fit with what you want to happen. You say you "don't know" why they attacked these people, you ignore evidence of those who were there and what they saw, and you try to make it fit into some class war you want desperately to happen.

I actually would believe Onceler when he says, "That isn't what I meant!"

You actually said that class wars were on the way, and are excited about it.

Bullshit! Class warfare is ongoing. I want it to end. Class warfare excellerated grossly under Bush II and is currently being prosecuted by the Tea Party.

What a crock of shit.

Why don't you address the points I made instead of calling it a rant.

If I write one concise sentence it is a "one liner". If I write a paragraph it is a rant.

Doubtless you are better informed than I am, but certainly not about my thoughts or desires.

I am merely ringing the warning bells for those two blind to see where their greed and/or the greed of those they support is leading us.
 
but this is a deep-down peek at the inner workings of the Return of Dune. We see Italy and Greece, and other places where your policies

My policies? What are my policies Damo?

Globalism killed Europe as it is killing this country.

I have preached against globalism for 30 fucking long years.

Localism is my policy.
 
it has to be somebody else's fault, let's blame those rich people! It's in your DNA. It isn't their fault, in fact if we taxed all of the richest at 100% we still wouldn't have enough money, they already pay almost all of the income taxes yet people say they don't "pay their fair share"...

Did Credit Default Swaps benefit me or the Rich?

Did bailing out wall street benefit me or the rich?

Did adjustable rate mortages benefit me or the rich?

Does closing a factory in Milwaukee and moving the production to China benefit me or the rich?

Does cutting funding for education benefit me or the rich?

Does spending more money on "defence" benefit me or the rich?

Does waging two unfunded wars for oil benefit me or the rich?

Does keeping the minimum wage below the poverty level benefit me or the rich?

Does having the wealthy pay the lowest taxs since 1928 benefit me or the rich?


Furthermore, why wouldn't we have enough? Is it because conservatards spent so much during Bush IIs administration? Why did Cheney say deficits don't matter?

It isn't their fault? Are you fucking serious? Their short term greed is the exact cause, hence, it most certainly is "Their fault" . Copied an ostrich much lately?
 
You can distract, you can try to push that reality away, but it is very real that the policies you want to see here are collapsing the economies in other nations. And they have the benefit of being able to rely on our defense spending, they spend our military budget on the policies that are crippling them... Government dependence hasn't created the utopia you maintain we will reach if we just copy them.

What the fuck are you talking about?
Why don't you tell me what policies I want to see here?
 
I think it's time for you to realize that when everyone who's bothered to read your post agrees on what it is you said, the fact that you didn't intend that understanding doesn't mean the interpretive skills of everyone who's read it are the problem.....

Eh - when it comes to the righties on this board, reading is definitely an issue.

I've asked a few times for the words I said that made people think I was defending the actual violence that occurred, but no one has come up w/ a thing. People here can be real doofuses....they just believe what they want, based on who the poster is.

The OP's point was media coverage; I have made clear many times on this thread that this is what I was addressing.
 
Eh - when it comes to the righties on this board, reading is definitely an issue.

I've asked a few times for the words I said that made people think I was defending the actual violence that occurred, but no one has come up w/ a thing. People here can be real doofuses....they just believe what they want, based on who the poster is.

The OP's point was media coverage; I have made clear many times on this thread that this is what I was addressing.

You said it was "a bummer". Your apathy gives us a clue that you really don't care. If it was gangs of whites beating up blacks, I doubt your response would have been "a bummer". Useful idiot.
 
You said it was "a bummer". Your apathy gives us a clue that you really don't care. If it was gangs of whites beating up blacks, I doubt your response would have been "a bummer". Useful idiot.

That's weak.

You're just embarassed that you didn't realize that a) the OP was about media coverage and b) my responses were about media coverage.

It's major, major egg in your face. I appreciate your feelings about that.
 
I think it's time for you to realize that when everyone who's bothered to read your post agrees on what it is you said, the fact that you didn't intend that understanding doesn't mean the interpretive skills of everyone who's read it are the problem.....

exactly. i've told him this repeatedly, but he still doesn't see it.
 
exactly. i've told him this repeatedly, but he still doesn't see it.

I actually think you've just been giving the righties reading lessons.

I'm still asking for the words where I'm "defending the violence." They don't exist. You guys are really fools...
 
I find it interesting as well that the small band of righties on this thread are pulling out all of the stops to try to stick w/ their embarassing misinterpretation of my posting, but not a one of them has called bravo out for his ignorant words.

You guys really know how to close the ranks...
 
lol...yeah...it is not you onceler...it certaintly can't be that so many different people understood your posts to mean X...oh no...everyone can't read poor little dunceler's posts...

what a joke
 
lol...yeah...it is not you onceler...it certaintly can't be that so many different people understood your posts to mean X...oh no...everyone can't read poor little dunceler's posts...

what a joke

Who are we talking about here? You, bravo, alias & PMP - not exactly an Algonquiin round table. Damo did as well, and I respect his intelligence, but he often confuses me with other posters, and confuses my words. I actually do believe it might be something about the rightie thought process.

Unless someone can produce actual words that I wrote where I'm defending anything about the incident, that is. Invite is still open...
 
128965622822315289.jpg
 
i already explained it to you no less than three times yesterday, with full quotes and full explanation of how you defended this racism. that is why i'm done with your bullshit. you ask for proof of something and then when it is given, repeatedly, you claim it was never given. you're a dishonest nutcase.
 
i already explained it to you no less than three times yesterday, with full quotes and full explanation of how you defended this racism. that is why i'm done with your bullshit. you ask for proof of something and then when it is given, repeatedly, you claim it was never given. you're a dishonest nutcase.

You didn't though. As I explained to you, you were lying.

There was absolutely nothing about what I said that even referred to the incident, much less "defended" it. Are you starting to believe your own lies?
 

See what? You think it's enought to just copy what I quoted, and then repeat your gross misinterpretation of it?

Like I said - I didn't even mention the incident, or indirectly refer to it. For anyone to try to say I'm "defending it"...it's just lacking in neurons. You'd be laughed out of any serious debate.
 
Back
Top