President Obama stands by the validity of the 2016 Presidential vote. He has no problem with the integrity of the voting results. Anything else is just fluff.
Bill Clinton's Meltdown ( the whining continues)
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
President Obama stands by the validity of the 2016 Presidential vote. He has no problem with the integrity of the voting results. Anything else is just fluff.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
You saying it over and over doesn't make it matter.
Why do you hate what the Founders gave us?
You are a traito
you are fond of wild speculations of motive. You don't know shit about me or my politics and I'm not about to waste my time dealing with a hyper-partisan hack.
NO ONE DISPUTES RUSSIAN INTERVENTION..(except Assange)
The dispute is still the motives & effects -and if you don't think INTEL agencies are capable of politicization,you weren't paying attention.
It happened on the INTEL about ISIS, when it was clear Obama wanted no part of ISIS's reach.
Obama even said he was misinformed by INTEL ( many agency peeps said they downplayed because that was what the WH wanted).
Why he called them "JV"
Then there was the Iraq war.
My post was on the EFFECT of 'Russian hacking' - distribution of Wikileaks.
Not the Clinton Emails which did the damage to her campaign -they were released by State.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
You can call it begging if you need to, but the fact remains that I exposed a yuuugghhhh hole in your argument, and obviously embarrassed you to the point that you resort to calling me "dumb". LOL
bullshit. and quit telling me to"grow up" when your mindless hate is driving your thoughts.
You of ALL PEOPLE know why I despise her (Libya et all ) "which you were already doing even before this election."
So stop being disingenuous about my motives re: Clinton.
and if you are calling me a "racist" - knock that shit off too.
Right. I live in one of the most conservative places in the country. Some of the most retarded and backwards anywhere.
Cancel 2018.1
New member
Why? It's a meaningless term nowadays. Everybody qualifies as a racist.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Imagine what they think of you.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
then move.....the place will be less retarded and backward......
I don't have 'Murica, NRA,'cold dead hands' or Jesus bumper stickers. I don't fly flags out of the back of my pickup. I'm not paranoid enough to pack 24/7
What they think of me? They don't think. That's the point, dullard. Whoosh yourself.
Ah, the old childish and sophomoric 'then move' bullshit. No surprise coming from you.
Especially when BAC is in the conversation as that is his fall back position when he has no point
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
its for the good of the community......
cawacko
Well-known member
Why do you live there?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Somewhere, Hubert Humphrey is feeling a little better about it all. What more would you need to know about Clinton than this: her final distinction as a candidate was to having the most faithless presidential electors ever.
Well, they did tell us that she’d make history…
What takes us from tragedy to farce on this, though, is that Clinton’s unhappy historical footnote came in an attempt to hurt Donald Trump.
A handful of Democrats were wedded to the idea of getting 37 Trump electors to flip, and thereby throw the contest to the House of Representatives. In the end, Trump lost two while Clinton lost five.
Woof.
It was amazing, then, that Clinton’s spokesman, Brian Fallon, had the chutzpah to scold the faithless Clinton electors referring to their behavior as “some kind of coup.”
One of the backers of the electoral revolt was Fallon’s old boss, erstwhile Clinton campaign chairman, John “The Phisherman” Podesta. Podesta had argued that electors should receive a classified national security briefing on the extent of Russia’s efforts to influence the campaign, an obvious effort to prejudice them against voting for Trump.
To have a spokesman complaining about unseemly coups after the gambit failed is a little too rich. After all, Clinton herself and her top spokespeople had been reinforcing the message on Russian involvement, seemingly hourly, for the past two weeks.
In the end, it not only backfired on Clinton, but robbed her of an opportunity to restore some luster to her name. Many prominent Democrats spoke out against the Electoral College shenanigans, urging Democrats to support the system even when they didn’t support its result.
Clinton passed on the chance to be an advocate for republican virtues and defender of democratic ideals in favor of hoping maybe she might be able to shoplift a term in the White House.
It’s sort of like the Clinton campaign jumping in on the Wisconsin and Michigan recounts only to actually find votes for Trump in Wisconsin and then accidentally expose widespread irregularities in the mostly Democratic precincts of Detroit.
Sad!
One elector who stayed, ahem, faithful was her own husband, Bill Clinton, who fulminated to reporters outside the statehouse in Albany about the unfairness of the whole campaign.
The former president may have lost a couple of steps since his heyday, but his gift for a triple bank-shot soundbite was still intact.
In one paragraph, he managed to falsely claim that his wife was “vindicated at the end” about her mishandling of state secrets by former Secretary of State Colin Powell and then still manage to pin the blame on “the Russians” and “the FBI deal.”
“She did everything else and still won by 2.8 million votes,” the former president said, and one can just imagine that bony finger when it’s squarely in the face of the assembled press corps.
But she was not vindicated. And she did not win by “2.8 million votes.” She lost by 77.
All of the excuse making. All of the focus on perceived slights. All of the hubris. All of the entitlement. All right there in one Clintonian paragraph.
Whatever history’s eventual verdict on the very eventful life of the 67th secretary of state, 42nd presidential nominee of the Democratic Party and 42nd first lady, part of her story will always be that after an astonishing failure in her second presidential run, she refused to take responsibility for her own failings.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/20/fitting-finale-for-house-clinton.html
Well, they did tell us that she’d make history…
What takes us from tragedy to farce on this, though, is that Clinton’s unhappy historical footnote came in an attempt to hurt Donald Trump.
A handful of Democrats were wedded to the idea of getting 37 Trump electors to flip, and thereby throw the contest to the House of Representatives. In the end, Trump lost two while Clinton lost five.
Woof.
It was amazing, then, that Clinton’s spokesman, Brian Fallon, had the chutzpah to scold the faithless Clinton electors referring to their behavior as “some kind of coup.”
One of the backers of the electoral revolt was Fallon’s old boss, erstwhile Clinton campaign chairman, John “The Phisherman” Podesta. Podesta had argued that electors should receive a classified national security briefing on the extent of Russia’s efforts to influence the campaign, an obvious effort to prejudice them against voting for Trump.
To have a spokesman complaining about unseemly coups after the gambit failed is a little too rich. After all, Clinton herself and her top spokespeople had been reinforcing the message on Russian involvement, seemingly hourly, for the past two weeks.
In the end, it not only backfired on Clinton, but robbed her of an opportunity to restore some luster to her name. Many prominent Democrats spoke out against the Electoral College shenanigans, urging Democrats to support the system even when they didn’t support its result.
Clinton passed on the chance to be an advocate for republican virtues and defender of democratic ideals in favor of hoping maybe she might be able to shoplift a term in the White House.
It’s sort of like the Clinton campaign jumping in on the Wisconsin and Michigan recounts only to actually find votes for Trump in Wisconsin and then accidentally expose widespread irregularities in the mostly Democratic precincts of Detroit.
Sad!
One elector who stayed, ahem, faithful was her own husband, Bill Clinton, who fulminated to reporters outside the statehouse in Albany about the unfairness of the whole campaign.
The former president may have lost a couple of steps since his heyday, but his gift for a triple bank-shot soundbite was still intact.
In one paragraph, he managed to falsely claim that his wife was “vindicated at the end” about her mishandling of state secrets by former Secretary of State Colin Powell and then still manage to pin the blame on “the Russians” and “the FBI deal.”
“She did everything else and still won by 2.8 million votes,” the former president said, and one can just imagine that bony finger when it’s squarely in the face of the assembled press corps.
But she was not vindicated. And she did not win by “2.8 million votes.” She lost by 77.
All of the excuse making. All of the focus on perceived slights. All of the hubris. All of the entitlement. All right there in one Clintonian paragraph.
Whatever history’s eventual verdict on the very eventful life of the 67th secretary of state, 42nd presidential nominee of the Democratic Party and 42nd first lady, part of her story will always be that after an astonishing failure in her second presidential run, she refused to take responsibility for her own failings.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/20/fitting-finale-for-house-clinton.html
clinton wanted to lie us into war with russia. I can't believe I am now the anti-poster and you want to drop bombs. I've come a long way. I used to love subjugating nations to our will, but now I see war for what it is, an excuse for the elites to line their pockets.
Cancel 2018.1
New member
To bad ttq is not here so the board could see an extreme version of that. It was laughable.
Cancel 2018.1
New member
There was a guy at dcj (packwolfdt, aka tutonic) that replied to his own posts.
I think he's wandering in the desert aimlessly now. Serious TARD affliction. I hope he seeks help.