Armed Citizen Stops Shooter at Indiana Mall: GOOD GUY WITH A GUN

Okay, when I've reduced you to this level where you live up to your screen name description I know you've got no rational or logical rebuttal left in you. That's why you edit out what you can't refute from my previous response so to make your folly seem more plausible. Pity for you that the chronology of the posts (a simple arrow clik) makes it easy for the objective reader to witness your undoing.

So you're done here, Dutch. And unlike the moronic MAGA/alt-right cretins you spare with, I'm not going down that rabbit hole with you. Catch you on another thread when you're more mature and rational.

What's the rational response to assholes proposing to strip Americans of their rights?
 
uhujijk-jpg-jpg.1044552
 
I'm not ATF but it does not take agenious to know you don't let the bad guys have guns. Oh wait you think killing border agents is just swell.

If you have a better way of figuring out how and why US guns kept ending up at Mexican crime scenes, I'm all ears and so is everyone else.

But I'm 100% certain you don't have any ideas because you're not really an "ideas" kind of person.

You're a follower.
 
Nah. I'm used to angry young women attacking me when I don't do as they want. LOL

Par for the course with emotional females?

Your view of the world is both highly unlearned and overly emotional. You "want" but have not solutions to attaining your goals other than stamping your little feet and being pouty.

Funny how you try to demean me because you think I'm a young woman, while avoiding responsibility for holding a sucky, selfish, and shitty position on an issue that you cannot defend, so instead you patronize.

For someone as old as you are, you sure seem to have a lot of growing up left to do.
 
this is no better irony to display how fucking stupid your bullshit is

300,000 guns are stolen from you idiots every fucking year, so it's not a matter of "if", it's a matter of WHEN.


"because you're no more of a clairvoyant than you are a psychic."

Exactly, so why am I placing my trust in you if I don't know whether or not you're going to act irresponsibly in some way that will harm others?

Because the worst case scenario is you committing a mass shooting, and you cannot say that you never will commit a mass shooting because you don't know and can't see the future.

So if the possibility exists that you would commit a mass shooting, shouldn't we do everything in our power to prevent that?
 
Last edited:
Nice to see you are back from your long penalty box time out.
Ever read the constitution?

Wasn't in any kind of penalty box, but obviously you missed me quite a bit because I am the only one who gives your life meaning, I suppose.

Wow...imagine defining your entire character and presence by how you interact with an anonymous person on the internet.

How sad. I feel sad for you. Sad that you're like this.
 
Okay, when I've reduced you to this level where you live up to your screen name description I know you've got no rational or logical rebuttal left in you. That's why you edit out what you can't refute from my previous response so to make your folly seem more plausible. Pity for you that the chronology of the posts (a simple arrow clik) makes it easy for the objective reader to witness your undoing.

So you're done here, Dutch. And unlike the moronic MAGA/alt-right cretins you spare with, I'm not going down that rabbit hole with you. Catch you on another thread when you're more mature and rational.

He's getting it in stereo now from us.

That's two posters in the same thread calling out the same behavior.
 
Funny how you try to demean me because you think I'm a young woman, while avoiding responsibility for holding a sucky, selfish, and shitty position on an issue that you cannot defend, so instead you patronize.

For someone as old as you are, you sure seem to have a lot of growing up left to do.
My assessment of you is as previously stated. It's a behavioral assessment, not necessarily a genetically or chronologically accurate one.

Why do you think being identified as a young woman is demeaning?

What issue are you claiming I'm defending? The unalienable right of self-defense? Why do you think only "sucky, selfish, and shitty" people defend self-defense?

Yes, I have a lot of growing to do. If one isn't growing then they are dying, eh?
 
300,000 guns are stolen from you idiots every fucking year, so it's not a matter of "if", it's a matter of WHEN.

Exactly, so why am I placing my trust in you if I don't know whether or not you're going to act irresponsibly in some way that will harm others?

Because the worst case scenario is you committing a mass shooting, and you cannot say that you never will commit a mass shooting because you don't know and can't see the future.

So if the possibility exists that you would commit a mass shooting, shouldn't we do everything in our power to prevent that?

you are no more a clairvoyant than you are a psychic.........which is immensely ironic given that you're 'predicting' i'm going to have a weapon stolen or that i'm going to commit a mass shooting.........

your problem, along with most other fuckstick liberals, is you believe, anticipate, and expect the worst from other human beings......except for people that believe as you do.

why on earth would I believe a single fucking word you've said, or what your moronic beliefs are? you've been proven wrong time and again on almost all of them.
 
My assessment of you is as previously stated. It's a behavioral assessment, not necessarily a genetically or chronologically accurate one.

Why do you think being identified as a young woman is demeaning?

What issue are you claiming I'm defending? The unalienable right of self-defense? Why do you think only "sucky, selfish, and shitty" people defend self-defense?

Yes, I have a lot of growing to do. If one isn't growing then they are dying, eh?

The reason you are trying to call me a young woman is because you're used to patronizing people as a defense mechanism, and it's easier for your lazy ass to patronize a woman than listen to her.

I'm not a young woman, but in order for your patronizing to not look like poor condescension, you have to invent the circumstance that I am.

That doesn't say anything good about your character or your ability to evaluate someone else's character.

How can you possibly evaluate someone else's character when you are too chickenshit to evaluate your own???
 
The reason you are trying to call me a young woman is because you're used to patronizing people as a defense mechanism, and it's easier for your lazy ass to patronize a woman than someone you view as your equal.

Nice projection. Why would I patronize anyone? What's in it for me?

You're my equal in some ways such as legally, not so much in others such as flying and shooting. The reverse is true in areas where you are an expert. I'm guessing you have one or two...or is that patronizing? LOL
 
you are no more a clairvoyant than you are a psychic.

And neither are you, and you cannot say with any certainty that at some point in the future you won't act irresponsibly with your guns.

That isn't a promise you can make; and because it's not a promise you can make or hold yourself accountable for, why should anyone trust in it when their safety and life is at stake?
 
And neither are you, and you cannot say with any certainty that at some point in the future you won't act irresponsibly with your guns.

That isn't a promise you can make; and because it's not a promise you can make or hold yourself accountable for, why should anyone trust in it when their safety and life is at stake?

ok peewee ROFL
 
which is immensely ironic given that you're 'predicting' i'm going to have a weapon stolen or that i'm going to commit a mass shooting

As remote as you may think the possibility is, it is still very real and very possible.

You don't hold yourself accountable for the shit you say here on JPP, so how the fuck can you convince me that you would hold yourself accountable for your guns when you won't hold yourself to account for your words????
 
your problem, along with most other fuckstick liberals, is you believe, anticipate, and expect the worst from other human beings.

That's because most humans are bad and selfish like you.

The reason we believe that is because of YOUR ENTIRE FUCKING HISTORY of words you've written here on JPP.

Violent words. Your discourse is violence. I have never seen any other shade of you more consistent than that.

The violent side is the only side you've ever shown publicly here on JPP.

So if you ask why I think you're unstable, it's because of what you've said my dude.

You literally said that you are a violent person and that you were trained to be a violent person.

So we're not assuming the worst, you are the worst.
 
Back
Top