And So It Begins.... Goodbye, America. It's Been Real.

[ZenMode]

Yes, you are discarding all of them.

Nope. I've discarded none. I've said some were wrong and one is unproven.

This was confirmed by [one of those facilitating the steal, i.e.]

Baseless speculation.

Georgia's Secretary of State after an investigation [performed by those who helped steal the 2020 election].

More baseless speculation and yet another cornerstone of conspiracy theorizing - when confronted with inconvenient information, just claim "they" were involved or it "goes higher".

It's like the joke about the conspiracy theorist who dies and goes to heaven. God says "You can ask me one question and I'll give you the answer".

The guy asks "who killed JFK?"

God says "Lee Harvey Oswald and he worked alone."

The Conspiracy Theorist says "Wow. This goes even higher than I thought."

We the People observed this and We were outraged. That is all that matters.

No. Your outrage means nothing as it relates to what actually happened.

The Democrat party will not be recovering from this for a long time.

You've yet to prove "this" even happened.

There is absolutely everything wrong with election officials presenting even the appearance of impropriety. If Georgia's officials hadn't been perpetrating a stolen election, they would have forfeited Biden at least in the districts and precincts where improprieties were observed.

There's no reason to believe that someone other than Biden won the state. They did like 9 recounts. The investigated every accusation of wrongdoing.

The problem is with you. You are totally dishonest.

Far from it. I just don't have a conspiratorial mind.

You deny eyewitness testimony that runs counter to your agenda of maintaining the false narrative that the stolen 2020 election was somehow not stolen.

I don't deny anything. I saw the magical suitcase of Biden ballots video just like you did. I saw the people losing their minds at TCF center because a camera man brought his camera equipment into the building through the back entrance. I read the affidavit from the semi driver.

 

[ZenMode]

Into the Night said:The truck full of ballots was caught by Canadian and US border agents, dumbass.

Link?

Wait.... you aren't talking about this are you?

USPS worker arrested at Canadian border with bin of mail, undelivered ballots

An upstate USPS employee was arrested Tuesday while crossing the US-Canada border with hundreds of envelopes and other undelivered mail — including several absentee ballots.

The Buffalo mailman, who was caught with over 800 pieces of mail inside his trunk that he had failed to deliver, said he had ended up on a bridge between the US and its neighbor to the north by accident, the Buffalo News reported.

Customs and Border Protection found a huge bin of mail spanning several zip codes in the vehicle. Among them were three absentee ballots from the Erie County Board of Elections, authorities told the newspaper.

.........Wilson denied knowing that he was in possession of three absentee ballots — which have become a focal point in the contentious 2020 presidential election.

USPS worker arrested at Canadian border with bin of mail, undelivered ballots

An upstate USPS employee was arrested Tuesday while crossing the US-Canada border with hundreds of envelopes and other undelivered mail — including several absentee ballots. The Buffalo mailman, wh…

nypost.com

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. You haven't read even a flake of the affidavits, and regardless, you do not get to redefine words.

Eyewitness testimony: a formal account, either written or oral, by an individual who directly observed an event, providing relevant details thereof.
Sworn Affidavit: a formal written account given under oath by an individual who directly observed an event, providing relevant details thereof.

Your attempts to redefine away the eyewitness testimony that you find to be inconvenient gest your argument discarded.


You have not refuted a single affidavit. You have not been able to provide any sort of rational argument that isn't blown out of the water by eyewitness testimony.


You have not refuted even the truck driver story. You have offered no support for anything you have claimed. Dismissed.


I'm not answering your questions. You are supposed to be in "refute" mode, and that requires you to refute, not ask stupid, irrelevant questions as an obvious distraction.


Correct, I won't do your work for you. If you want to refute an affidavit, then you need to first read the affidavit in question, then you can present your argument. If your argument is nothing more than a question, you are dismissed. You need to present an argument.

Until then, the affidavits stand and the election was obviously stolen as they outline.


How many times can you tip your king without even making a single move?

Answering questions, based on claims YOU made, isn't doing my work. You are making the claims. YOU need to answer the questions. You need to explain how this grand election-stealing conspiracy unfolded.

Since I'm not the on who believes all this nonsense, I have no way of answering...because I wouldn't believe what I was saying.

The problem is, when you actually think through all these conspiracy theories, and consider what/who would have to be involved, the whole thing quickly unravels.

That's a reality you aren't prepared to face because...

 

[Into the Night]

I'm not discarding them.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

I'm calling them what they are and what they are is someone who believes they saw something and I provided two easy examples of people being wrong with what they saw.

You cannot just discard affidavits, Void. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

According to who?

Now you're going to try to justify pulling suitcases filled with ballots out from under desks after hours???

It was the standard storage container for ballots.

A suitcase is not a standard storage container for ballots.

This was confirmed by Georgia's Secretary of State after an investigation.

He has no authority here.

And there's absolutely nothing wrong with putting the containers under, on top or next to the tables. What does it matter?

It is ILLEGAL.

And, if you're storing something under a table,

A suitcase is not just 'storing something under a table'.

until it's processed, you then have to pull that thing OUT from under the table to process it.

You cannot process ballots without observers or after hours. It is ILLEGAL.

It was the standard storage container for ballots.

A suitcase is not a standard storage container for ballots.

This was confirmed by Georgia's Secretary of State.

Blatant lie, and he has no authority here.

WTF is wrong with you? Seriously?

Why do you want to support election fraud?

Late on Nov. 3, election workers in Fulton County, Georgia, heard that they would be allowed to go home for the night. So they packed uncounted ballots into suitcases and prepared to lock up for the evening.

When word came that they couldn’t leave yet, they dragged the suitcases back out and began counting the ballots again.

ILLEGAL.

That singular scene — of workers taking out suitcases of votes — was then selectively edited and shared by allies of President Trump as a conspiracy theory that election workers had dragged out fraudulent ballots under the cover of night. According to the theory, those suitcases helped swing Georgia’s Electoral College votes to President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.

But on Monday, Georgia’s secretary of state office dedicated part of a morning news conference to debunking that falsehood and many others, in what was called “Disinformation Monday.” Gabriel Sterling, the voting implementation manager in Georgia and a Republican, said in the news conference that watching the entire surveillance footage of Election Day showed that workers had first packed the suitcases with valid, uncounted ballots and then later unpacked those same ballots. They had not taken out suitcases full of fake ballots, he said.

ILLEGAL.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/07/technology/suitcases-ballots-georgia-election.html#:~:text=Approval%20Ratings-,Top%20Georgia%20election%20official%20debunks%20'ridiculous'%20claims%20about%20election%20fraud,Biden%20Jr.

No, it's not. Observers are PERMITTED by not REQUIRED according to Georgia law.

There were no observers present, Void. They were counting after hours with NO OBSERVERS PRESENT.

And there was no "after hours". Because of the extremely high number of mail-in ballots, they counted all night.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox, Voiid.

 

[Into the Night]

I have read some of them and regardless of which one you read, they are ALWAYS what someone BELIEVES they saw until what they believe they saw is confirmed. I've provided multiple examples and addressed the truck driver. You ignore my questions about the logistics of what would need to happen for his claim to be true. You ignore requests to point the finger at specific people and explain the logistics of what would need to happen to pull of a stunt like what is claimed to have happened in PA.

You ignore those questions because you can't answer them... because you are a conspiracy theorist.

Argument of the Stone fallacies. You cannot just discard affidavits. You cannot just make the evidence of Democrat election fraud disappear.
The Democrat party is a conspiracy. It is no theory.

 

[Into the Night]

Answering questions, based on claims YOU made, isn't doing my work.

There are no questions, Void.

You are making the claims.

No. The witnesses made the claims.

YOU need to answer the questions.

You aren't asking any questions, Void.

You need to explain how this grand election-stealing conspiracy unfolded.

RQAA

Since I'm not the on who believes all this nonsense, I have no way of answering...because I wouldn't believe what I was saying.

Argument of the Stone fallacies. It doesn't matter what you believe. You cannot make affidavits just disappear. You cannot make any bit of the evidence of Democrat election fraud just disappear either.

The problem is, when you actually think through all these conspiracy theories, and consider what/who would have to be involved, the whole thing quickly unravels.

The Democrat part is a conspiracy. It is no theory.

That's a reality you aren't prepared to face because...

Buzzword fallacy. You don't know that 'reality' is either. Go learn what that word means and how it's defined.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. I've discarded none.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

I've said some were wrong and one is unproven.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

Baseless speculation.

Same paradox.

More baseless speculation and yet another cornerstone of conspiracy theorizing - when confronted with inconvenient information, just claim "they" were involved or it "goes higher".

Same paradox. Argument of the Stone fallacy. The Democrat party is a conspiracy. It is no theory.

It's like the joke about the conspiracy theorist who dies and goes to heaven. God says "You can ask me one question and I'll give you the answer".

It is no theory.

The guy asks "who killed JFK?"

JFK is not being discussed here. Pivot fallacy.

God says "Lee Harvey Oswald and he worked alone."

Lee Harvey Oswald is not being discussed here. Pivot fallacy.

The Conspiracy Theorist says "Wow. This goes even higher than I thought."

The Democrat party is a conspiracy. It is no theory.

No. Your outrage means nothing as it relates to what actually happened.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

You've yet to prove "this" even happened.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. You cannot just discard any evidence of Democrat election fraud.

There's no reason to believe that someone other than Biden won the state.

What State?

They did like 9 recounts. The investigated every accusation of wrongdoing.

Who is 'they'?

Far from it. I just don't have a conspiratorial mind.

Yes you do. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

I don't deny anything.

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

I saw the magical suitcase of Biden ballots video just like you did.

A video isn't magic, Void. Neither are suitcases.

I saw the people losing their minds at TCF center because a camera man brought his camera equipment into the building through the back entrance.

No cameraman, Void. It was security cameras.

I read the affidavit from the semi driver.

You never read a single affidavit, liar.