And So It Begins.... Goodbye, America. It's Been Real.

[Phantasmal]

So, you can't support your bullshit.

But we both knew that from the start.

You sold your integrity for the promotion of Communism.

Sad.

This is why I don’t, you attack every fact posted as bs, but , here ya go.

You really should find better news sources to keep up on issues.

https://www.financialexpress.com/business/investing-abroad-71-large-us-companies-go-bankrupt-in-july-highest-since-pandemic-3944803/

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is why I don’t, you attack every fact posted as bs, but ya go.

You really should find better news sources to keep up on issues.

https://www.financialexpress.com/business/investing-abroad-71-large-us-companies-go-bankrupt-in-july-highest-since-pandemic-3944803/

You post bullshit. Partisan nonsense that is contrary to the established facts. Then you post insults when challenged to support your false claims.

When you make a claim - it is up to YOU to support that claim.

 

[Phantasmal]

You post bullshit. Partisan nonsense that is contrary to the established facts. Then you post insults when challenged to support your false claims.

When you make a claim - it is up to YOU to support that claim.

Like I said, you declare everything partisan bs, and have an inability to accept facts, that’s your problem, not mine.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Like I said, you declare everything partisan bs, and have an inability to accept facts, that’s your problem, not mine.

You refuse to support the demagoguery you post simply because you can't.

You hate Trump and want the worst for America - but can't support the slander and libel you post.

You don't like being called out? Then do better, find something legitimate to criticize Trump on - stop posting outright lies.

 

[FastLane]

So eliminating mass mail out of ballots is the end of America. How did we ever get by without them in the past?

 

[anonymoose]

A few states and DC conduct all elections by mail-in votes. This wasn't an issue until trump made it one, and all the magas fell in line behind him like lemmings.

Alaska has voted via mail-in ballots for years with no problems. The #TangerineTyrant is not going to be able to change that. The Constitution gives the ability to run elections to the states, not to the feds. Remember how much MAGATs and other Republikkkans pretend to support states' rights?

. As for your post above, she didn't mention "universal" vote by mail so maybe detect some more on that one.

She was replying to christie who stated, clearly, "all elections by mail-in votes". She didn't have to mention the word 'universal'.
All states have always had absentee voting. If you think Trump wants to get rid of that you're delusional and like Bowel are just fabricating since you really have nothing.

 

[Into the Night]

Your detective's mind hard at work, huh. As for your post above, she didn't mention "universal" vote by mail so maybe detect some more on that one.

She did, Marty...and she's wrong.

 

[Into the Night]

We may not have to worry about all this horseshit Trump says we can't have elections if we are at war.

President Trump Quips About Canceling 2028 Elections If U.S. Is At War

During an Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on ending the war with Russia, President Trump appears to imply that the 2028 elections could be cancelled if the U.S. is at war. “During the war, you can't have elections? So let me just see, three and a half years from...

www.c-span.org

During an Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on ending the war with Russia, President Trump appears to imply that the 2028 elections could be cancelled if the U.S. is at war. “During the war, you can't have elections? So let me just see, three and a half years from now, if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections? That's good," Mr. Trump says in response to the Ukrainian leader's comments on committing to holding elections after the war with Russia is over.

I say this is all bullshit and Trump is trying to pull a power play.
In what war since WWII haven't we been able to have elections?
NONE, not a one.

It is time for Congress to step in and do something about this mad man.

The year 2020...caused by Democrat election fraud.

 

[Into the Night]

Eyewitness testimony is what somebody thinks they saw. Again, someone in Detroit thought they saw a guy pulling a wagon with a black case full of ballots into the rear entrance of the building where ballots were being counted. In reality, the eyewitness saw a cameraman pulling a wagon with a black case containing his camera equipment.

In Georgia, somebody thought they saw workers pulling cases of magical Biden ballots out from under a table. In reality, they saw someone pulling out the standard container that ballots are stored in and, as ballot counters are known to do, that worker was taking a container full of perfectly legal ballots out from under a table to count them.

Clearly neither the truck driver nor the woman at the counter was the mastermind behind the alleged ballot transportation scam in PA, unless you believe that she has access to truckloads of ballots. So, of it wasn't "they", who was it that coordinated the whole thing? Josh Shapiro? Nancy Pelosi? Chuck Schumer?

Let's say it was Shapiro. Obviously he needed help, right? I mean, HE can't print/steal truckloads of ballots, so who else was involved? Is it the company that prints ballots? If yes, which company and which employees? I can't imagine that ONE employee has the ability, without being noticed, to print a truckload of ballots and somehow load/transport them.

So, now we have Shapiro, multiple people at a ballot printing company and a significant number of people to load the semi trailer before our "eyewitness" hero arrives on the scene.

Or we have Shapiro coordinating the theft of a truckload of ballots, which means he still needs a bunch of people to help and has to either a) hope nobody notices a truck load of missing ballots or b) has to get everyone involved in the manufacturing/storage/tracking of the ballots on his side.

Go ahead....lay it out for me.

How did it all go down?

Argument of the Stone fallacies. You cannot just discard affidavits.
Suitcases are NOT 'standard ballot containers', and there is no need to pull ANYTHING out from under a desk. Counting after hours with no observers is ILLEGAL.
The truck full of ballots was caught by Canadian and US border agents, dumbass.

I already laid it out for you. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

Exactly.

Keep crazy alive!

Why do you want to keep your crazy denial alive?

 

[Into the Night]

This is why I don’t, you attack every fact posted as bs, but , here ya go.

Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'fact' means, Phanty. It does NOT mean Universal Truth.

You really should find better news sources to keep up on issues.

Propaganda is not news, Phanty.

https://www.financialexpress.com/business/investing-abroad-71-large-us-companies-go-bankrupt-in-july-highest-since-pandemic-3944803/

You should learn to read a graph, Phanty. You just denied your own argument.

 

[Into the Night]

Like I said, you declare everything partisan bs, and have an inability to accept facts, that’s your problem, not mine.

Go learn what 'fact' means, Phanty. It does NOT mean Universal Truth or 'proof'.
Buzzword fallacy.

You posted partisan BS. Now you claim that you are everything!

 

[IBDaMann]

Eyewitness testimony is what somebody thinks they saw.

You're chanting. You haven't read the affidavits. We're done.

Again, someone in Detroit thought they saw a guy pulling a wagon with a black case full of ballots ...

... spoken as though there is only this one, fictitious affidavit. Stupid.

Your king is tipped again.

 

[ZenMode]

Argument of the Stone fallacies. You cannot just discard affidavits.

I'm not discarding them. I'm calling them what they are and what they are is someone who believes they saw something and I provided two easy examples of people being wrong with what they saw.

Suitcases are NOT 'standard ballot containers',

According to who? It was the standard storage container for ballots. This was confirmed by Georgia's Secretary of State after an investigation.

and there is no need to pull ANYTHING out from under a desk.

And there's absolutely nothing wrong with putting the containers under, on top or next to the tables. What does it matter?

And, if you're storing something under a table, until it's processed, you then have to pull that thing OUT from under the table to process it.

It was the standard storage container for ballots. This was confirmed by Georgia's Secretary of State.

WTF is wrong with you? Seriously?

Late on Nov. 3, election workers in Fulton County, Georgia, heard that they would be allowed to go home for the night. So they packed uncounted ballots into suitcases and prepared to lock up for the evening.

When word came that they couldn’t leave yet, they dragged the suitcases back out and began counting the ballots again.

That singular scene — of workers taking out suitcases of votes — was then selectively edited and shared by allies of President Trump as a conspiracy theory that election workers had dragged out fraudulent ballots under the cover of night. According to the theory, those suitcases helped swing Georgia’s Electoral College votes to President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.

But on Monday, Georgia’s secretary of state office dedicated part of a morning news conference to debunking that falsehood and many others, in what was called “Disinformation Monday.” Gabriel Sterling, the voting implementation manager in Georgia and a Republican, said in the news conference that watching the entire surveillance footage of Election Day showed that workers had first packed the suitcases with valid, uncounted ballots and then later unpacked those same ballots. They had not taken out suitcases full of fake ballots, he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/07/technology/suitcases-ballots-georgia-election.html#:~:text=Approval%20Ratings-,Top%20Georgia%20election%20official%20debunks%20'ridiculous'%20claims%20about%20election%20fraud,Biden%20Jr.

Counting after hours with no observers is ILLEGAL.

No, it's not. Observers are PERMITTED by not REQUIRED according to Georgia law.

And there was no "after hours". Because of the extremely high number of mail-in ballots, they counted all night.

The truck full of ballots was caught by Canadian and US border agents, dumbass.

Link?

I already laid it out for you. RQAA.

Riiiiight.

 

[IBDaMann]

Actually, I don’t want America to fail.

Sure you do. Tell the board why Trump should not protect our economy.

It’s why I didn’t vote for DonOld,

Of course. Donald Trump runs on a platform of putting America first and of making America great again, and you oppose all that because you don't want America to fail.

You are as stupid as you presume everyone else is.

I saw heat he did to our country last time.

To the best of your knowledge, you are unaware of any way Trump fell short of "Best President Ev-Ah!" in the execution of his official duties as President. As such, you have absolutely no examples to support your stupid claim.

Bankruptcies are up, at the rate they were his last term.

Nope. You are simply dishonest, and you want America to fail.

 

[Based Chad]

How?
it IS in the CONSTITUTION saying it is up to the states legislatures to decide HOW they want to appoint their delegates to the EC any way they want.
And according to that they don't even need to hold elections they can just appoint whom they want.
READ the Constitution.

ok

we can go with this system.

 

[ZenMode]

You're chanting. You haven't read the affidavits. We're done.

I have read some of them and regardless of which one you read, they are ALWAYS what someone BELIEVES they saw until what they believe they saw is confirmed. I've provided multiple examples and addressed the truck driver. You ignore my questions about the logistics of what would need to happen for his claim to be true. You ignore requests to point the finger at specific people and explain the logistics of what would need to happen to pull of a stunt like what is claimed to have happened in PA.

You ignore those questions because you can't answer them... because you are a conspiracy theorist.

 

[Based Chad]

What does it matter?

 

[IBDaMann]

I'm not discarding them.

Yes, you are discarding all of them.

This was confirmed by [one of those facilitating the steal, i.e.] Georgia's Secretary of State after an investigation [performed by those who helped steal the 2020 election].

We the People observed this and We were outraged. That is all that matters. The Democrat party will not be recovering from this for a long time.

And there's absolutely nothing wrong with putting the containers under, on top or next to the tables. What does it matter?

There is absolutely everything wrong with election officials presenting even the appearance of impropriety. If Georgia's officials hadn't been perpetrating a stolen election, they would have forfeited Biden at least in the districts and precincts where improprieties were observed.

WTF is wrong with you? Seriously?

The problem is with you. You are totally dishonest. You deny eyewitness testimony that runs counter to your agenda of maintaining the false narrative that the stolen 2020 election was somehow not stolen.

 

[IBDaMann]

I have read some of them and regardless of which one you read, they are ALWAYS what someone BELIEVES they saw until what they believe they saw is confirmed.

Nope. You haven't read even a flake of the affidavits, and regardless, you do not get to redefine words.

Eyewitness testimony: a formal account, either written or oral, by an individual who directly observed an event, providing relevant details thereof.
Sworn Affidavit: a formal written account given under oath by an individual who directly observed an event, providing relevant details thereof.

Your attempts to redefine away the eyewitness testimony that you find to be inconvenient gest your argument discarded.

I've provided multiple examples

You have not refuted a single affidavit. You have not been able to provide any sort of rational argument that isn't blown out of the water by eyewitness testimony.

and addressed the truck driver.

You have not refuted even the truck driver story. You have offered no support for anything you have claimed. Dismissed.

You ignore my questions about the logistics of what would need to happen for his claim to be true.

I'm not answering your questions. You are supposed to be in "refute" mode, and that requires you to refute, not ask stupid, irrelevant questions as an obvious distraction.

You ignore requests to point the finger at specific people

Correct, I won't do your work for you. If you want to refute an affidavit, then you need to first read the affidavit in question, then you can present your argument. If your argument is nothing more than a question, you are dismissed. You need to present an argument.

Until then, the affidavits stand and the election was obviously stolen as they outline.

... because you are a conspiracy theorist.

How many times can you tip your king without even making a single move?