Why Liberals Play the Race Card

Take a look at our forum on any given day, and you will find at least a few hot threads on racism. Recently, it seems to have gotten worse. Of course, actual racial relations in America have never been better. As time goes by, new generations come along, and the prejudices of the older folks are forgotten. We've made great strides since the Civil Rights era, in the way of education and jobs, but also in societal acceptance of differing races and cultures. It's reflected in our TV programs, advertising, and even in politics. For the first time in our history, America elected a black man president. We see Latino and Hispanic governors, we see cabinet positions held, nominations for the highest courts, and positions of power in the government. It's not just democrats who are putting these people in their respective positions, former president Bush made more appointments of cabinet-level positions to minorities than any other president, ever. Including Obama! One of the brightest stars in the Republican party at the moment, is a Cuban-American governor from Florida, Marco Rubio. For a time, the leading GOP front-runner was a black CEO. And one of the top, if not THE top, superstars at any Tea Party rally, is Lt. Col. Allen West.... a black man. Daughter of the late MLK, Alveda King, is also a frequent speaker at Tea Party rallies.

So we can clearly see that the supposed "racism" the left is claiming, simply does not exist in reality. This begs the question, why do liberals try so hard to throw the racism charge at the right? It certainly can't be, to win over people from the other side, because it's a direct and personal insult. You can't insult someone into accepting your viewpoints, it doesn't work. But here's what CAN happen, the constant maintaining of the 'perception' (even though false) might work to sway the vote of someone. If they believe Republicans are all racists, they won't vote for them, no matter what the options are. Or maybe they are independents who just decide to stay home and not vote, just in case Republicans ARE racists, wouldn't want to be associated to that. It's an insidious mind-control game, designed to diminish enthusiasm for the GOP. Apparently, their polling data must indicate it works to some degree, they continue to do it.

Before the 2008 elections, the conventional wisdom was, electing a black man president would represent monumental progress in race relations. We were supposedly going to enter a new era, one of colorblindness, and unity as a society. Is that what we've seen? To the contrary, we now see that "racism" is used at the drop of a hat, like a weapon in political battle. Everything that happens is viewed through the prism of race, every inkling of thought that can be construed (or misconstrued) as racist, is exploited at every opportunity. You can't even express criticism for the president without being hooted down as a "racist intolerant bigot who hates the black man in the White House!" If anything, Obama served to polarize race relations, but the sad thing is, I don't think it's because Obama is black, I think it's because he has been Chief Instigator of racial divisiveness at every opportunity.

True racism is not only disgusting and unacceptable, it is an indicator of low human character. Unfortunately, we will always be plagued by some elements of racism in society, to believe that anything else is possible, is a fantasy that will never happen. To some degree, all humans are prejudiced. Prejudice becomes racism through bigotry and ignorance, but prejudice is completely normal and part of being a human. It is the bigotry and ignorance which culminates in racist thought, racist belief, and racist sentiment. Having prejudices only makes you "racist" if you are bigoted in your prejudice. Racism is the thought or belief that one race is superior or inferior to another. If your actions reflect this thinking, you are said to be "racist." Where there is a real problematic gray area, is with how we view normal human prejudices. Liberals tend to want to blur the lines, and this means that virtually ANY prejudice becomes racist. The flaw with that thinking is, we are ALL prejudice to some degree, it's part of the human condition.

To continually focus on things which are clearly not racist, and call people racists who clearly aren't, is to do a sad injustice in combating real instances of intolerant bigotry and ignorance. How many hate-filled racists are out there filling our children's minds with their nonsense, while we lob the term "racist" around so casually, as a political tool? The true RACISTS in our society, are pretty much getting a free pass right now, because Liberals want to exploit the word 'racist' and use it as a weapon in their war on the right. That's really shameful when you think about it.
 
i wouldn't base to many decisions about things because of the liberal posters on this board. the majority of them are extreme far leftwing nutters and if you notice, most of the threads about race are by \\\legiontroll///. all he does is troll and try and bait people. i don't like ignore, but i'm pretty close to putting him on it as it has gotten out of hand. the forum is not really enjoyable anymore. it is pretty much left wing hatred and propaganda.
 
it's above your head onceler. don't bother trying.

LOL - and just the other day, you were marginalizing Dix as some sort of crazed weirdo who had nothing to do w/ your party. Funny how the narrative changes when it's convenient for you.

Oh - and did you know that ol' Dix has argued that racism ended w/ the Civil Rights Acts of the '60's?

Betchya didn't know that...
 
LOL - and just the other day, you were marginalizing Dix as some sort of crazed weirdo who had nothing to do w/ your party. Funny how the narrative changes when it's convenient for you.

Oh - and did you know that ol' Dix has argued that racism ended w/ the Civil Rights Acts of the '60's?

Betchya didn't know that...

nothing you said has anything to do with the OP. it is a good OP, and i'm not surprised you don't understand it. so you let your insecurities get the best of you again and all you can do is mock dixie. pretty sad onceler.
 
nothing you said has anything to do with the OP. it is a good OP, and i'm not surprised you don't understand it. so you let your insecurities get the best of you again and all you can do is mock dixie. pretty sad onceler.

The OP is the same endless drivel I have heard from Dixie on this subject for almost 10 years, on 3 different boards. Again - he thinks racism basically ended w/ the '60's.

It didn't.
 
LOL - and just the other day, you were marginalizing Dix as some sort of crazed weirdo who had nothing to do w/ your party. Funny how the narrative changes when it's convenient for you.

Oh - and did you know that ol' Dix has argued that racism ended w/ the Civil Rights Acts of the '60's?

Betchya didn't know that...

The 60's were wild

Perhaps he forgot the words of Democrat Gov. G. Wallace in 1962
"In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever"

Or his ""Stand in the Schoolhouse Door" in 1963

During the 1966 campaign, George Wallace signed state legislation to nullify desegregation guidelines between Alabama cities and counties and the former United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

On January 13, 1972, Wallace declared himself a presidential candidate, entering the field with George McGovern, 1968 nominee Hubert Humphrey, and nine other Democratic opponents. In Florida's primary, Wallace carried every county to win 42 percent of the vote; another of his opponents was John V. Lindsay, the liberal mayor of New York, who had switched from former Republican affiliation to enter the Democratic presidential primaries

1972, he was shot five times by Arthur Bremer while campaigning in Laurel, Maryland.
Following the assassination attempt, Wallace was visited at the hospital by Democratic Congresswoman and presidential primary rival Shirley Chisholm,[49] a representative from Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn who at the time was the nation's only African-American female member of Congress.
 
The OP is the same endless drivel I have heard from Dixie on this subject for almost 10 years, on 3 different boards. Again - he thinks racism basically ended w/ the '60's.

It didn't.

you really are a moron. you should have tried to comprehend the OP instead of just knee-jerk mocking like you always do. like i've told you before, you are the one who has the read comprehension problem. from the OP:

Unfortunately, we will always be plagued by some elements of racism in society,

LOL...onceler fails again...how embarrassing
 
You mean...there are racist Democrats? Gasp!

Do you think racism is political or something, bravs?

You claimed " that ol' Dix has argued that racism ended w/ the Civil Rights Acts of the '60's"

I'm showing you all that the '60 certainly did not end racism at all....it was alive and well even though there
were some improvements ...... no ...it didn't end with the Civil Rights Acts of the '60's,,,
 
you really are a moron. you should have tried to comprehend the OP instead of just knee-jerk mocking like you always do. like i've told you before, you are the one who has the read comprehension problem. from the OP:



LOL...onceler fails again...how embarrassing

That's a fairly intellectually dishonest interpretation of what Dixie wrote, but par for the course. His gist is that MOST racism we see is the "made up" kind from liberals - not real racism. And this is consistent with his views, stated many times, that racism essentially ended in the '60's.

Anything else you want to try to save face? Whatever it is, I'm sure it won't be filed under "honest"...
 
You claimed " that ol' Dix has argued that racism ended w/ the Civil Rights Acts of the '60's"

I'm showing you all that the '60 certainly did not end racism at all....it was alive and well even though there
were some improvements ...... no ...it didn't end with the Civil Rights Acts of the '60's,,,

So, we agree. I thought Dix was pretty dumb for saying that, as well....
 
That's a fairly intellectually dishonest interpretation of what Dixie wrote, but par for the course. His gist is that MOST racism we see is the "made up" kind from liberals - not real racism. And this is consistent with his views, stated many times, that racism essentially ended in the '60's.

Anything else you want to try to save face? Whatever it is, I'm sure it won't be filed under "honest"...

so you're saying:

Unfortunately, we will always be plagued by some elements of racism in society,

actually means racism ended in the 60's? LOL

tell me...what was i dishonest about little buddy?
 
so you're saying:

Unfortunately, we will always be plagued by some elements of racism in society,

actually means racism ended in the 60's? LOL

tell me...what was i dishonest about little buddy?

Context, l'il buddy. He's talking about it in terms of being a problem that is essentially solved, though there will always be "some elements." It certainly doesn't sum up the feelings of the OP to try to simplistically define it like that - but I understand that is how your brain works.

And Dixie has argued often that racism basically died in the '60's.
 
Back
Top