Nearly One-Third of Faculty in Red States Say They’ve Censored Their Research

I know if it's on the subjects in your original link, what they're writing is dreck. Their "academics" are on this level.


I read 'Dr. Jill Biden's' doctoral thesis. A Jr. high school kid should have been embarrassed to turn that sort of tripe in for review and grading. But she liked to be called 'Doctor Jill Biden'.
 
I read 'Dr. Jill Biden's' doctoral thesis. A Jr. high school kid should have been embarrassed to turn that sort of tripe in for review and grading. But she liked to be called 'Doctor Jill Biden'.
Right. So she is the only academic in the United States who wrote a Phd.
 
Right, so she's a good example of how low standards are in 'academia', and why it's become a joke.
I usually reserve that for the liberal arts. The serious subjects like hard sciences, engineering, business, and the like still have standards because they have to produce graduates that can go into the business world and get results.
 
No one but you thinks military weapons is an academic subject.
The engineers and scientists researching them do. They are definitely an academic subject for military historians too. I have a whole self of books on operations research full of academic level stuff on that very subject.

For example, I have read numerous academic studies on advance rates in warfare, and even have come up with a novel variant of what everybody to now has been doing on this using calculus.

What others have missed is that the 'instantaneous rate of advance'' and what determines that is what is important along with the concepts of acceleration, deceleration, and friction. I simply don't have enough data to turn it into something worth publishing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top