Full Text of Leftist Psycho Incel Cole Allen's "Manifesto"

[Grokmaster]

The leftist psycho incel soun ds like most of the leftists at JPP, and like multiple elected Treason-o-crat elected officials.



This is from WEAR TV, via ABC news :

Read the manifesto in full:​

Hello everybody!

So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.

I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for “Most Wanted.”

I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)

I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.

I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.

I don’t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.

On to why I did any of this:

I am a citizen of the United States of America.

What my representatives do reflects on me.

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)

While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)

I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.

Rebuttals to objections:

Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.

Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.

Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes.

Follow the latest on the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner:

The security loopholes that allowed Cole Allen to get near White House Correspondents’ Dinner — as Trump says this proves need for his ballroom

Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.

Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn’t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be “inconvenient” for people who aren’t the victim?

This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.

Objection 3: You didn’t get them all.

Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.

Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn’t be the one doing this.

Rebuttal: I don’t see anyone else picking up the slack

Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.

Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.

I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.)

Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.

Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.

Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.

Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.

Thank you to the many acquaintances I’ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.

Thank you all for everything.

Sincerely,

Cole “coldForce” “Friendly Federal Assassin” Allen

PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.

Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.

What I got (who knows, maybe they’re pranking me!) is nothing.

No damn security. Not in transport. Not in the hotel. Not in the event.

Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.

I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.

The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.

Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it’s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.

Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit.

Actually insane.

Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it’s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.

'Friendly federal assassin': Read accused gunman's manifesto sent before dinner attack

Allen is facing multiple federal charges.

weartv.com

 

[Grim Reaper]

The leftist psycho incel soun ds like most of the leftists at JPP, and like multiple elected Treason-o-crat elected officials.



This is from WEAR TV, via ABC news :

Read the manifesto in full:​

Hello everybody!

So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.

I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for “Most Wanted.”

I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)

I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.

I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.

I don’t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.

On to why I did any of this:

I am a citizen of the United States of America.

What my representatives do reflects on me.

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)

While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)

I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.

Rebuttals to objections:

Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.

Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.

Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes.

Follow the latest on the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner:

The security loopholes that allowed Cole Allen to get near White House Correspondents’ Dinner — as Trump says this proves need for his ballroom

Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.

Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn’t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be “inconvenient” for people who aren’t the victim?

This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.

Objection 3: You didn’t get them all.

Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.

Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn’t be the one doing this.

Rebuttal: I don’t see anyone else picking up the slack

Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.

Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.

I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.)

Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.

Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.

Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.

Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.

Thank you to the many acquaintances I’ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.

Thank you all for everything.

Sincerely,

Cole “coldForce” “Friendly Federal Assassin” Allen

PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.

Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.

What I got (who knows, maybe they’re pranking me!) is nothing.

No damn security. Not in transport. Not in the hotel. Not in the event.

Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.

I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.

The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.

Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it’s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.

Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit.

Actually insane.

Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it’s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.

'Friendly federal assassin': Read accused gunman's manifesto sent before dinner attack

Allen is facing multiple federal charges.

weartv.com

​

1. The manifesto expresses ​

Across all major news outlets that published or summarized the manifesto — including ABC News/WEAR, NBC News, AP, and CNN — the shooter’s stated motive is:

• His personal belief that Trump is a “pedophile, rapist, and traitor.”
• His belief that he had a moral duty to act.
• His frustration with the administration’s actions.
• His anger at perceived injustices.

None of the reporting identifies a partisan or ideological affiliation.None of the reporting identifies “leftist rhetoric” as a motivating factor.None of the reporting identifies Democratic politicians as influencing him.

This is consistent across outlets.

2. Law enforcement has not identified a political ideology​

As of the latest reporting:

• Federal investigators have not attributed a partisan motive.
• No agency has stated he was acting on behalf of a political movement.
• No evidence has been released tying him to left‑wing groups, activism, or messaging.

This is important:Investigators have not confirmed any political ideology.

3. The manifesto does ​

The text includes:

• Apologies
• Personal moral reasoning
• Religious framing
• Anger at Trump
• Criticism of the Secret Service
• Self‑descriptions (“half‑black, half‑white,” “American citizen”)
• A list of grievances he attributes to the administration

What it does not include:

• Mentions of Democrats
• Mentions of left‑wing ideology
• Mentions of progressive causes
• Mentions of left‑wing media
• Mentions of political rhetoric from the left
• Any ideological framework (socialist, progressive, anarchist, etc.)

There is no ideological vocabulary typical of left‑wing political manifestos.

4. Calling him a “leftist psycho incel” is not supported by the text​

This is an interpretation, not a fact.

The manifesto does not:

• Identify him as left‑wing
• Reference left‑wing beliefs
• Reference left‑wing politicians
• Reference left‑wing media
• Reference left‑wing causes

The only political figure mentioned is Trump, and the shooter’s accusations are personal, not ideological.

​

Grok’s post uses a common rhetorical pattern:

1. Label → Assumption → Conclusion​

He starts with a label (“leftist psycho incel”), then treats the label as evidence, then uses the label to justify the conclusion.This is circular reasoning.

2. Guilt‑by‑association​

He claims the manifesto “sounds like leftists at JPP” and “elected Democrats,” but provides no examples, citations, or parallels.This is an assertion, not evidence.

3. Emotional framing​

Words like “leftist psycho,” “treason‑o‑crat,” and “sleazocrats” are rhetorical devices meant to provoke, not inform.

4. Selective reading​

He quotes the manifesto but ignores the absence of:

• ideological content
• partisan references
• political alignment

He fills the gaps with his own assumptions.

​

• The manifesto expresses personal moral outrage, not partisan ideology.
• No law enforcement agency has identified a political motive.
• No reporting has linked the shooter to left‑wing groups or rhetoric.
• The manifesto contains zero references to Democrats or left‑wing ideology.
• Grokmaster’s claim is not supported by the text or by any credible source.

 

[tigerred59]

IT TOOK EM A FEW HOURS TO START THE TRUMP NARRATIVE, BUT ITS H.E.R.E......I cringe at how stupid and pathetic the ppl are in this nation, just cringe at how so easily controlled they can become. The last fuckin thing this sorry ass nation need is a gold plated fuckin ballroom to worship DONALD FUCKIN TRUMP!!! Who the fuck is gonna fill these spaces??? The man can barely fill a correspondent dinner in his fuckin honor....LOL NOBODY LIKES THIS BITCH BUT BASIC MAGA BITCHES.

 

[Grokmaster]

​

1. The manifesto expresses ​

Across all major news outlets that published or summarized the manifesto — including ABC News/WEAR, NBC News, AP, and CNN — the shooter’s stated motive is:

• His personal belief that Trump is a “pedophile, rapist, and traitor.”
• His belief that he had a moral duty to act.
• His frustration with the administration’s actions.
• His anger at perceived injustices.

None of the reporting identifies a partisan or ideological affiliation.None of the reporting identifies “leftist rhetoric” as a motivating factor.None of the reporting identifies Democratic politicians as influencing him.

This is consistent across outlets.

2. Law enforcement has not identified a political ideology​

As of the latest reporting:

• Federal investigators have not attributed a partisan motive.
• No agency has stated he was acting on behalf of a political movement.
• No evidence has been released tying him to left‑wing groups, activism, or messaging.

This is important:Investigators have not confirmed any political ideology.

3. The manifesto does ​

The text includes:

• Apologies
• Personal moral reasoning
• Religious framing
• Anger at Trump
• Criticism of the Secret Service
• Self‑descriptions (“half‑black, half‑white,” “American citizen”)
• A list of grievances he attributes to the administration

What it does not include:

• Mentions of Democrats
• Mentions of left‑wing ideology
• Mentions of progressive causes
• Mentions of left‑wing media
• Mentions of political rhetoric from the left
• Any ideological framework (socialist, progressive, anarchist, etc.)

There is no ideological vocabulary typical of left‑wing political manifestos.

4. Calling him a “leftist psycho incel” is not supported by the text​

This is an interpretation, not a fact.

The manifesto does not:

• Identify him as left‑wing
• Reference left‑wing beliefs
• Reference left‑wing politicians
• Reference left‑wing media
• Reference left‑wing causes

The only political figure mentioned is Trump, and the shooter’s accusations are personal, not ideological.

​

Grok’s post uses a common rhetorical pattern:

1. Label → Assumption → Conclusion​

He starts with a label (“leftist psycho incel”), then treats the label as evidence, then uses the label to justify the conclusion.This is circular reasoning.

2. Guilt‑by‑association​

He claims the manifesto “sounds like leftists at JPP” and “elected Democrats,” but provides no examples, citations, or parallels.This is an assertion, not evidence.

3. Emotional framing​

Words like “leftist psycho,” “treason‑o‑crat,” and “sleazocrats” are rhetorical devices meant to provoke, not inform.

4. Selective reading​

He quotes the manifesto but ignores the absence of:

• ideological content
• partisan references
• political alignment

He fills the gaps with his own assumptions.

​

• The manifesto expresses personal moral outrage, not partisan ideology.
• No law enforcement agency has identified a political motive.
• No reporting has linked the shooter to left‑wing groups or rhetoric.
• The manifesto contains zero references to Democrats or left‑wing ideology.
• Grokmaster’s claim is not supported by the text or by any credible source.

More AI bullshit. Nothing but regurgitated WIKI horseshit.


The manifesto says what it says.

Allen is a murderous, leftist, psycho incel....and your bullshit does not change that.


Choke on it.

 

[Grokmaster]

View attachment 82259IT TOOK EM A FEW HOURS TO START THE TRUMP NARRATIVE, BUT ITS H.E.R.E......I cringe at how stupid and pathetic the ppl are in this nation, just cringe at how so easily controlled they can become. The last fuckin thing this sorry ass nation need is a gold plated fuckin ballroom to worship DONALD FUCKIN TRUMP!!! Who the fuck is gonna fill these spaces??? The man can barely fill a correspondent dinner in his fuckin honor....LOL NOBODY LIKES THIS BITCH BUT BASIC MAGA BITCHES.

Trump is glaringly correct Only a fucking imbecile ( check the mirror) would choose to continue to force WH guests to be outside under tents, on folding chairs.

The WHCD was standing room only; makeup some more lies.

The Ballroom would be for State Dinners, etc.

Try to get a clue, moron.

 

[tigerred59]

MSM is gonna milk this sorry as nigga down to the bone marrow in his body. Every white person that missed, you got a name, some bs foot notes and that's it....this BLACK MAN, by the time MSM gets through rippin his black ass apart, we'll know what color his under wear was that night....MSM is gonna love covering this nigga. WOKE finally has the BLACK FACE ALL OF MAGA AND TRUMP HAS BEEN WAITING FOR.

 

[Grim Reaper]

More AI bullshit. Nothing but regurgitated WIKI horseshit.


The manifesto says what it says.

Allen is a murderous, leftist, psycho incel....and your bullshit does not change that.


Choke on it.

You can shout AI bullshit all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that you still can’t point to the line in the manifesto that proves your claim. The document’s right there. You posted it. And it still doesn’t say what you keep insisting it does.

If you had the quote, you’d use it. You don’t. That’s the whole story.

Everything else is just you getting louder to cover the gap.

 

[Grokmaster]

Countdown to fellow leftist incels sending loveletters to Cole Allen in jail....3...2...1...

 

[Jade Dragon]

You can shout AI bullshit all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that you still can’t point to the line in the manifesto that proves your claim. The document’s right there. You posted it. And it still doesn’t say what you keep insisting it does.

If you had the quote, you’d use it. You don’t. That’s the whole story.

Everything else is just you getting louder to cover the gap.

Aww, is Grokey another one who cries about AI spankings? Too bad, so sad. Why do they whine about something incapable of bias? Is it their fact allergies?

 

[Grokmaster]

You can shout AI bullshit all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that you still can’t point to the line in the manifesto that proves your claim. The document’s right there. You posted it. And it still doesn’t say what you keep insisting it does.

If you had the quote, you’d use it. You don’t. That’s the whole story.

Everything else is just you getting louder to cover the gap.

Nonsense. Your AI source is nothing more that WIKI bullshit, from all leftists sources; it does nothing to mitigate the ASTUAL WORDS of the leftist incel psycho Allen, which I provided, unedited, verbatim.

Your powers of observation, linear thought and logical deduction need a lot of work.

 

[RB 60]

Countdown to fellow leftist incels sending loveletters to Cole Allen in jail....3...2...1...

Maybe Kamala will call for donations for his bail money...

 

[Grokmaster]

Aww, is Grokey another one who cries about AI spankings? Too bad, so sad. Why do they whine about something incapable of bias? Is it their fact allergies?

Sorry, buit pretending regurgitated WIKI bullshit is an accuirte is laughable.


I can play that. too:


Based on evidence available as of April 27, 2026,
Cole Tomas Allen
is widely described by law enforcement and media reports as having radical left-leaning or anti-Trump political views.
Key details regarding his ideological background include:

• Political Affiliation & Support: Allen is a resident of Torrance, California, who was a registered Democrat. Records show he made a $25 donation to the Democratic platform ActBlue in October 2024, which was earmarked for Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign.
• Organizational Ties: The Department of Justice is currently investigating Allen's alleged ties to a leftist activist group known as "The Wide Awakes". His sister reported to NPR that he considered himself a member of this network, which focuses on social justice issues.
• Political Activism: He reportedly participated in nationwide "No Kings" anti-Trump marches in March 2026.
• Online Presence: Investigators noted that Allen was an active user of the social media platform Bluesky, where he posted more than 1,000 times, frequently railing against President Trump and the Republican Party.
• Manifesto: Approximately 10 minutes before the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Dinner on April 25, 2026, Allen sent a "rambling anti-Trump manifesto" to his family. In the note, he referred to himself as a "Friendly Federal Assassin" and expressed a duty to target Trump administration officials due to his vehement opposition to their policies.
  New York Post +9

While some observers, including The New York Post, categorize him as a "leftist extremist," others suggest he may have been a "lone wolf" with a "chaotic, unaligned ideology" that happened to align with anti-Trump sentiment.
Substack +1

 

[Grokmaster]

You can shout AI bullshit all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that you still can’t point to the line in the manifesto that proves your claim. The document’s right there. You posted it. And it still doesn’t say what you keep insisting it does.

If you had the quote, you’d use it. You don’t. That’s the whole story.

Everything else is just you getting louder to cover the gap.

Can't read? Already posted it. OP post.

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)

While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)

I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.








What a dunce.

 

[Grim Reaper]

Can't read? Already posted it. OP post.

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)

While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)

I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.








What a dunce.

If you actually had the line, you’d paste it instead of hiding behind it’s in the OP. That’s the dodge people use when they know the text doesn’t back them up. You keep calling me a dunce, but you still can’t produce the one thing that would prove you right.

All you’ve shown so far is that you can type insults. You still can’t quote the motive you swear is there.

 

[Lionfish]

​

1. The manifesto expresses ​

Across all major news outlets that published or summarized the manifesto — including ABC News/WEAR, NBC News, AP, and CNN — the shooter’s stated motive is:

• His personal belief that Trump is a “pedophile, rapist, and traitor.”
• His belief that he had a moral duty to act.
• His frustration with the administration’s actions.
• His anger at perceived injustices.

None of the reporting identifies a partisan or ideological affiliation.None of the reporting identifies “leftist rhetoric” as a motivating factor.None of the reporting identifies Democratic politicians as influencing him.

This is consistent across outlets.

2. Law enforcement has not identified a political ideology​

As of the latest reporting:

• Federal investigators have not attributed a partisan motive.
• No agency has stated he was acting on behalf of a political movement.
• No evidence has been released tying him to left‑wing groups, activism, or messaging.

This is important:Investigators have not confirmed any political ideology.

3. The manifesto does ​

The text includes:

• Apologies
• Personal moral reasoning
• Religious framing
• Anger at Trump
• Criticism of the Secret Service
• Self‑descriptions (“half‑black, half‑white,” “American citizen”)
• A list of grievances he attributes to the administration

What it does not include:

• Mentions of Democrats
• Mentions of left‑wing ideology
• Mentions of progressive causes
• Mentions of left‑wing media
• Mentions of political rhetoric from the left
• Any ideological framework (socialist, progressive, anarchist, etc.)

There is no ideological vocabulary typical of left‑wing political manifestos.

4. Calling him a “leftist psycho incel” is not supported by the text​

This is an interpretation, not a fact.

The manifesto does not:

• Identify him as left‑wing
• Reference left‑wing beliefs
• Reference left‑wing politicians
• Reference left‑wing media
• Reference left‑wing causes

The only political figure mentioned is Trump, and the shooter’s accusations are personal, not ideological.

​

Grok’s post uses a common rhetorical pattern:

1. Label → Assumption → Conclusion​

He starts with a label (“leftist psycho incel”), then treats the label as evidence, then uses the label to justify the conclusion.This is circular reasoning.

2. Guilt‑by‑association​

He claims the manifesto “sounds like leftists at JPP” and “elected Democrats,” but provides no examples, citations, or parallels.This is an assertion, not evidence.

3. Emotional framing​

Words like “leftist psycho,” “treason‑o‑crat,” and “sleazocrats” are rhetorical devices meant to provoke, not inform.

4. Selective reading​

He quotes the manifesto but ignores the absence of:

• ideological content
• partisan references
• political alignment

He fills the gaps with his own assumptions.

​

• The manifesto expresses personal moral outrage, not partisan ideology.
• No law enforcement agency has identified a political motive.
• No reporting has linked the shooter to left‑wing groups or rhetoric.
• The manifesto contains zero references to Democrats or left‑wing ideology.
• Grokmaster’s claim is not supported by the text or by any credible source.

AI response. Do better.

 

[Grokmaster]

If you actually had the line, you’d paste it instead of hiding behind it’s in the OP. That’s the dodge people use when they know the text doesn’t back them up. You keep calling me a dunce, but you still can’t produce the one thing that would prove you right.

All you’ve shown so far is that you can type insults. You still can’t quote the motive you swear is there.

Stupidfuck...I just did.

What a fucking idiot.

 

[Grokmaster]

AI response. Do better.

It can't; it's a JR High/ HS kid who thinks he's making big waves with the grownups, cutting/pasting run of the mill AI

 

[Grim Reaper]

Stupidfuck...I just did.

What a fucking idiot.

Screaming I did! isn’t the same as actually posting the line. If you had it, you’d paste it instead of melting down in all caps. You can throw whatever names you want, but none of that covers the fact you still can’t produce the quote you swear exists.

All the noise in the world won’t fix that gap.

 

[RB 60]

Aww, is Grokey another one who cries about AI spankings? Too bad, so sad. Why do they whine about something incapable of bias? Is it their fact allergies?

 

[Grim Reaper]

Aww, is Grokey another one who cries about AI spankings? Too bad, so sad. Why do they whine about something incapable of bias? Is it their fact allergies?

You watching the meltdown? Pure comedy