Here’s a
fact‑check and
bias analysis of the comment from
Teflon Don on JustPlainPolitics.com, keeping everything grounded in verifiable reporting.
The comment makes
four separate claims:
- The shooter’s “melanin content” explains why “JPP marxists are quiet.”
- Joy Reid is somehow involved or relevant.
- If the shooter were a MAGA supporter, “leftists would make 100 threads.”
- “Violence is from the left.”
Only one of these even
attempts to reference factual information — the rest are political generalizations, not evidence‑based claims.
Let’s break them down.
1. “Look at his melanin content.”
Fact check:
The CBS News article you linked
does not mention the suspect’s race.
Most major outlets (CBS, AP, NBC, ABC, Reuters)
did not report race because it was not relevant to the investigation.
This part of the comment is
not based on any confirmed reporting.
It is an
inference by the commenter, not a fact.
2. “Joy Reid can’t help them.”
Fact check:
There is
no reporting that Joy Reid (MSNBC host) has commented on the shooting at the time of the CBS article.
This is
speculation, not fact.
3. “If this were someone in a MAGA hat… there would be 100 threads.”
Fact check:
This is a
hypothetical, not a factual claim.
It cannot be verified or falsified because it describes an imagined scenario.
It reflects the commenter’s
perception of forum behavior, not evidence.
4. “But we all know that the violence is from the left.”
Fact check:
This is
not supported by crime statistics.
Here is what reputable, nonpartisan sources show:
FBI & DHS Findings
- The FBI and Department of Homeland Security have repeatedly reported that the majority of ideologically motivated fatal attacks in the U.S. in the last decade were committed by domestic violent extremists associated with white supremacist or anti‑government ideologies.
- These groups are generally categorized as far‑right, not “the left.”
Sources:
- FBI: Domestic Terrorism: Definitions, Terminology, and Methodology
- DHS: Homeland Threat Assessment
- GAO (Government Accountability Office): Countering Violent Extremism
These reports
do not support the claim that “violence is from the left.”
Important note:
This does
not mean “the right is violent” — it means the commenter’s claim that “violence is from the left” is
not supported by federal data.
The comment contains several clear indicators of
strong partisan bias:
1. Racial insinuation
“Look at his melanin content” is a racially charged statement.
It implies political reactions are determined by race — a
biased assumption, not a fact.
2. Group generalization
Calling other forum users “JPP marxists” assigns a political identity to an entire group without evidence.
3. Predictive assumptions
Claiming people “would” react a certain way in a hypothetical scenario is
not factual — it’s projection.
4. Absolutist language
“But we all know…”
This rhetorical device is used to present opinion as universal truth.
5. Unsupported political conclusion
“Violence is from the left” contradicts federal data and is a
political narrative, not a factual statement.
- The CBS News article does not support the commenter’s claims about race, political affiliation, or motive.
- The statement “violence is from the left” is not supported by FBI, DHS, or GAO data.
- The comment is primarily political rhetoric, not factual analysis.
- It uses racial insinuation, partisan framing, and generalizations rather than evidence.
www.dailymail.com
