So the Smithsonian can’t show that slavery was bad?

There were no good parts to slavery. If you think there were then why don't you go offer yourself up to be a slave. There are still places in the world where it happens.



LOL. If you think that AI is a good support for teaching then you weren't a good teacher. Sorry, sweetie. AI is simply too prone to errors at this point. Besides, a teacher should know the subject sufficient to teach it accurately.

Ergo: you must not have been very good.

QED.
There was no A! when I was teaching...
I didn't teach our African American History classes...
But my students had every opportunity to learn about their history....we could walk or take the bus...
Or just listen in and about the neighborhood...;)
Today, there are more resources than ever available...
 
I guess we have to show both sides of slavery? The good and negative?
That is what Florida says and has added to the curiculum.

I mean... why focus on only the negatives like 'lack of freedom' when the slaves 'got work skills'...


... that the slave owners benefitted from.
 
An example of bad education.
Bad to learn the truth about the KKK eh?

The Cambridge Guide to African American History

Klansmen, beside other diehard groups, violently resisted Reconstruction. Still defending the South, they fought Union Army occupation, Republican governments, and blacks’ freedom. Donning hoods and using secret titles, they took an oath to defend Christianity, the Constitution, and the white race, especially their women's purity. Loyal to the Democratic Party, the Klan enlisted men and women from all classes. Targeting Union Leagues (freedmen's political clubs), night riders harassed and often killed black and Republican voters and officeholders, burned black churches and schools, intimidated teachers, and stole elections. In the 1868 elections, alongside Knights of the White Camellia, they murdered 1,000 black and white Republicans in Louisiana alone.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top