T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Were those the same sort of trials that showed masks to be effective?
DOJ Lawyer ADMITS FDA War Against Ivermectin was a Mistake
- Thread starter TravisBickle
- Start date
Yakuda
Verified User
NIH and JAMA? both with vested interestsHere are just a few
Examining the Evidence: Ivermectin and COVID-19 in the PRINCIPLE Trial — PRINCIPLE Trial
This section dives into the PRINCIPLE trial's specific methodology and comprehensive data on ivermectin's effectiveness, following participants for up to 12 months post-treatment in community settings. It aims to offer an objective, evidence-based overview of this repurposed drug's potential role.www.principletrial.org
The impact of ivermectin on COVID-19 outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis - PMC
The COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in approximately seven million deaths globally, underscores the urgency for effective treatments. Ivermectin, among several repurposed drugs, garnered interest due to its antiviral properties. However, conflicting ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Effect of Higher-Dose Ivermectin for 6 Days vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial - PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04885530.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Effect of Ivermectin on Time to Resolution of Symptoms Among Adults With Mild COVID-19
This randomized trial compares the effects of ivermectin vs placebo on time to symptom resolution within 21 days among patients with mild COVID-19.jamanetwork.com
That first study concludes ivermectin should not be prescribed. I didnt realize it was the job of researchers to declare what should and should not be prescribed. Their claim is the 2 days of improvement with ivermectin arent significant enough to give their "blessing" ivermectin. If a doctor and their patient want to try ivermectin why should anyone else like researchers say no. Drugs are used for off label use all the time.
Last edited:
The study published ny Lancet was later retracted.
“The Lancet published a controversial study regarding ivermectin's effectiveness for COVID-19, which was later retracted due to concerns about the reliability of the data. This incident highlights the challenges in ensuring the accuracy of research during a health crisis.The Guardian
monash.edu
You mean under pressure from the Biden Junta during the police state in 2021.
Yes, but at $5 a treatment - it wasn't going to bring in billions for Pelosi and the other Inside Traders.
No, you sighted a study that was later retracted. Current studies state invermectin is not an effective treatment or prevention for COVID. The End
Cited.
And no, it wasn't retracted. The authors conducted valid research and stand behind it. Notice that you turned to the radical left sewer of the Guardian, rather than citing an actual retraction from the medical journal, the Lancet. The Lancet was coerced to print a disclaimer under enormous pressure from both the British and American governments,
Comedy Gold
Here’s some other references on the retractions
Doesn’t sound like they were forced, sounds like they learned their lesson,
Both NIH and JAMA have scientific standards although NIH only reposts papers that were published in scientific journals. Then it seems you ignored the Lancet and NEJM published studies.
The study says with an average of 16 days of symptoms, a 2 day difference is not significant because invermectin acts the same as ibuprofen or any other anti-inflammatory drug which have fewer side effects.
Gosh, why can't your doctor prescribe opioids for athlete's feet or a simple cold?
I thought we were talking about Ivermectin?
Oh right - you're trying to pull a switch after being exposed...
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
I posted videos showing how effective masks were.
Yakuda
Verified User
If ivermectin acts the same as ibuprofen then there was no reason to a prevent doctors from prescribing it. Why would it matter if a doctor prescribed ibuprofen to a COVID patient? The problem was they were trying to ban doctors from prescribing it. That's fuckig bullshit especially if it just acts the same as ibuprofen like you claim.
ibuprofen doesn't have the same side effects dumbass.
Invermectin has different side effects compared to ibuprofen since ibuprofen has fewer side effects compared to ibuprofen.
Where is your evidence that they ever tried to ban doctors from providing it? They did messaging saying it wasn't effective and not to take it particularly if it was horse dewormer. Part of the reason for that is because people were self medicating using it including a couple that died. Lots of people were using animal invermectin instead of getting a doctor's prescription.
Of the 21 persons who called in August, 11 were men, and most were older than 60 years of age (median age, 64; range, 20 to 81). Approximately half (11 persons) were reported to have used ivermectin to prevent Covid-19, and the remaining persons had been using the drug to treat Covid-19 symptoms. Three persons had received prescriptions from physicians or veterinarians, and 17 had purchased veterinary formulations; the source of ivermectin for the remaining person was not confirmed.
2 dead after taking ivermectin in New Mexico
Two people have died in New Mexico after taking a deworming drug to treat COVID-19, officials said.
I take some once in a while.I recommend that you take a daily dose!
Why? Do you have worms?
I take it if a get a cold that could possibly be Covid. Never hurts.
serendipity
Verified User
You really are a moron, it's cited not sighted.
Regarding the studies, the only one I trust is the PRINCIPLE one conducted by the world renowned Nuffield Foundation.
New study shows ivermectin lacks meaningful benefits in COVID-19 treatment — PRINCIPLE Trial
New research led by the University of Oxford has concluded that the antiparasitic drug ivermectin does not provide clinically meaningful benefits for treating COVID-19 in a largely vaccinated population.