Another angry young White guy with a gun

volsrocks said:
AI Overview

In 2019, approximately 91% of Black homicide victims were killed by Black offenders, according to the Violence Policy Center.





Compared to the homicide victimization rate for white persons (3.2 per 100,000) in 2023, the homicide rate was higher for black persons (21.3 per 100,000)



3.2 VS 21.3 91%blacks killed by another black yet its whites blacks need to worry about
Click to expand...
:palm: You seriously need to take off that pointy hood, because its distorting your vision. From the site you reference:

The study found that nationwide, 91 percent of women killed by men were murdered by someone they knew and that the most common weapon used was a gun.
Nationwide, 1,795 females were murdered by males in single victim/single offender incidents in 2019, at a rate of 1.18 per 100,000. Of the 1,795 female homicide victims, 1,166 were white, 501 were Black, 53 were Asian or Pacific Islander, 39 were American Indian or Alaskan Native, and in 36 cases the race of the victim was not identified.
Note that NOWHERE does it say anything about "91% of Black homicide victims were killed by Black offenders". And the percentage you give is pretty moot, as the vast majority of ANY murder victims are done by same race perpetrators.
Black women are disproportionately impacted by lethal domestic violence. In 2019, Black females were murdered by males at a rate of 2.34 per 100,000, more than twice the rate of 0.99 per 100,000 for white women murdered by men.
Now the stat game is always interesting, because when you look at raw numbers, there is a higher number of black homicides, BUT NOT by the dramatic implications of your previous sources. Note here that you can look at different time frames when the information was collected. Note in a 3 month period the difference is around 440 victims. A terrible thing to be sure, but not the rampaging horror show you and your "stats" & "rates" infer.
www.cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend
AND YOU ARE STILL NOT ADDRESSING THE FACT THAT THE MAJORITY OF MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE PAST 30 YEARS HAVE BEEN COMMITTED BY FOLK WHO LOOK JUST LIKE YOU UNDER THAT POINTY HOOD.
www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/

As I continue to try and teach you; the victims and surviving families don't give a good God damn about the color of the perpetrator. Carry on.
 
Taichiliberal said:
:palm: You seriously need to take off that pointy hood, because its distorting your vision. From the site you reference:

The study found that nationwide, 91 percent of women killed by men were murdered by someone they knew and that the most common weapon used was a gun.
Nationwide, 1,795 females were murdered by males in single victim/single offender incidents in 2019, at a rate of 1.18 per 100,000. Of the 1,795 female homicide victims, 1,166 were white, 501 were Black, 53 were Asian or Pacific Islander, 39 were American Indian or Alaskan Native, and in 36 cases the race of the victim was not identified.
Note that NOWHERE does it say anything about "91% of Black homicide victims were killed by Black offenders". And the percentage you give is pretty moot, as the vast majority of ANY murder victims are done by same race perpetrators.
Black women are disproportionately impacted by lethal domestic violence. In 2019, Black females were murdered by males at a rate of 2.34 per 100,000, more than twice the rate of 0.99 per 100,000 for white women murdered by men.
Now the stat game is always interesting, because when you look at raw numbers, there is a higher number of black homicides, BUT NOT by the dramatic implications of your previous sources. Note here that you can look at different time frames when the information was collected. Note in a 3 month period the difference is around 440 victims. A terrible thing to be sure, but not the rampaging horror show you and your "stats" & "rates" infer.
www.cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend
AND YOU ARE STILL NOT ADDRESSING THE FACT THAT THE MAJORITY OF MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE PAST 30 YEARS HAVE BEEN COMMITTED BY FOLK WHO LOOK JUST LIKE YOU UNDER THAT POINTY HOOD.
www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/

As I continue to try and teach you; the victims and surviving families don't give a good God damn about the color of the perpetrator. Carry on.
Click to expand...
1755258601088.png

1755258762248.png
 
volsrocks said:
View attachment 56411

View attachment 56412
Click to expand...
Poor little sheet wearer. You make a statement THAT WAS NOT supported by the initial sources you linked. Once that was pointed out, you immediately/desperately searched for any other stat information that shows black folk committing more murders than white folk.

If you bothered to READ CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY (damn, I've been trying to teach that to yahoos like you for over 20 years now!) you would have read what I wrote; Note here that you can look at different time frames when the information was collected. Note in a 3 month period the difference is around 440 victims. A terrible thing to be sure, but not the rampaging horror show you and your "stats" & "rates" infer.
'
AND YOU ARE STILL NOT ADDRESSING THE FACT THAT THE MAJORITY OF MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE PAST 30 YEARS HAVE BEEN COMMITTED BY FOLK WHO LOOK JUST LIKE YOU UNDER THAT POINTY HOOD....THE ORIGINAL TOPIC OF THIS THREAD.
www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/

Oh, and about your latest accumulation .... do some homework as to how the "rates" thrown about just don't make much sense beyond a higher homicide rate in the black community. NOTE THAT THERE IS NO INFORMATION GIVEN ABOUT WHITE ON WHITE HOMICIDES AS THERE IS ON BLACK FOLK.

Also, riddle me this: how can you use a base number of 100,000 people, then claim that the overall homicide RATE was 7.1, then say the same base number is 26.6 for black, 3.2 or 3.9 for white. If you are using the base number of people separately, it's a large population difference so any "percentages" or rates will be markedly different. That would make the "general" rate irrelevant. If you don't understand, get a nearby adult to explain it to you before you regurgitate the SOS.

It's like this, you pointed hooded palooka: crime in poverty areas and the residents there of will always be higher than non-poverty areas. Now I know you sheet wearers are in denial of ANYTHING that does not paint black folk as degenerate folk, but that's nothing new .... as is your denial of the same situations among the white population in this country. You excuse it as a numbers game....yet you say nothing when black folk make sizeable percentage in law enforcement, military, medical, social services, construction, etc.

So come back when you grow a pair and deal with the subject title of this thread. We'll wait.
 
Guno צְבִי said:
Are we tired of this play yet? How many re-runs are enough?
Click to expand...
You're lying. You're a leftist. You want these kinds of tragedies to continue endlessly. If you didn't, you push to end defenselessness zones and to end all killing of living humans who have not committed any crime.

You aren't fooling anyone but other leftists.
 
Stone said:
Wow...another imbecile. Walter Walter Walter....smh
Click to expand...
One of us is an imbecile... Maybe it is me for saying handing out guns to children on the promise they will keep those guns in their desks is misguided, or maybe it is you for proposing such a stupid idea.
 
archives said:
Can’t be said enough, too many guns out there and too easy access to too many guns

Mass, random, even school shootings are as American as apple pie, happens so often Americans have become desensitized to it all, what would have shocked the country even thirty years ago is yesterday’s news today

And the right’s solution, we need more guns and easier access
Click to expand...
Review this, Anchovies, stamp it to your forehead…

The Supreme Court decision that established an individual's right to own firearms for self-defense was District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008. This landmark ruling affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms, not just for militia service, but also for traditionally lawful purposes like self-defense within the home.

You don’t get to decide how many guns are allowed, Anchovies.

Poor Anchovies.
 
Earl said:
Review this, Anchovies, stamp it to your forehead…

The Supreme Court decision that established an individual's right to own firearms for self-defense was District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008. This landmark ruling affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms, not just for militia service, but also for traditionally lawful purposes like self-defense within the home.

You don’t get to decide how many guns are allowed, Anchovies.

Poor Anchovies.
Click to expand...
Ah, Heller did not establish that owning a gun was an absolute right, no SCOTUS has, in fact, in his Majority Opinion Scalia himself stressed this fact. If you are going to cite a Decision as your “proof” at least know what the decision said
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top