Define "even if"? Does that make the following words a claim of truth? No, it proposed a hypothetical situation.Jarod said:
I would have guessed the number would be higher. Once TACO is able to work on them a bit and get them accumulated he would lose very few, even if video were to come out of him raping a 16 year old girl, while she cried and screamed for help.
LOL so you disagree with what the FBI said they did. LOL alright.“Reportedly.” Oops.
So, no culpatory…or exculpatory proof.I know Robin well. She is correct, the law is clear, TACO's attorneys knew that also.
Additionally, Grand Jury records would contain a small fragment of the file.
Except for the victims.So, no culpatory…or exculpatory proof.
You are genuinely screwed.
Define "even if"? Does that make the following words a claim of truth? No, it proposed a hypothetical situation.
Yes, hypothetical, not a claim it happened. Would not be admissible in a court.So, no culpatory…or exculpatory proof.
You are genuinely screwed.
Yes, hypothetical, not a claim it happened. Would not be admissible in a court.
It was a hypo used to illustrate what extent of moral compromise I believe many Trumppers would accept.
Maybe a tutor on reading comprehension would help you, I know its higher level thinking than spelling or grammar, but I bet if you try very hard you could muster the intelligence to begin to understand more complex rhetoric.
(Bloomberg) -- The Federal Bureau of Investigation redacted President Donald Trump’s name and those of other high-profile individuals from government files related to Jeffrey Epstein, according to three people familiar with the matter.“But the president’s name was reportedly redacted from documents surrounding the investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as the administration prepared for their potential public release.”
“Reportedly.”
Lol
Judge, the defendant was “reportedly…”
Too funny!
“…according to three people…”The receptionist’s post should be stored at the Smithsonian for the further enlightenment of generations to come.
It will be obvious when the files are shown to the court and the names are redacted dumbass.“…according to three people…”
Judge, “according to three people.”
Too funny.
Take a hike, pendejo/a…and go to law school.It will be obvious when the files are shown to the court and the names are redacted dumbass.
This is my thread asshole. LOLTake a hike, pendejo/a…and go to law school.
Take a hike from your thread, pendejo/a.This is my thread asshole. LOL
I sure can. Now answer the question...why didnt you cocksuckers dredge this up when the imbecile Brandon was in office, bitch?So you can't read.