Judge says 2-year-old US citizen appears to have been deported with ‘no meaningful process’ The girl was deported Friday with her mother to Honduras,

Question: What "meaningful (legal) process" can a 2-year-old comprehend?
Does that make sense to you? A court hearing would have established all the questions in debate. We would know what the father and the mother wanted. We could have established who was the legal guardian and who could take care of the child. Courts have ways to determine things and questioning a 2 year old is not one of them.
 
Does that make sense to you? A court hearing would have established all the questions in debate. We would know what the father and the mother wanted. We could have established who was the legal guardian and who could take care of the child. Courts have ways to determine things and questioning a 2 year old is not one of them.
The person the hearing is about is a 2-year-old. It's like giving animals rights. Neither a 2-year-old nor an animal can understand the proceedings and those proceedings are about them.
 
Not as a percentage of illegal entries. By percentage, Biden's removal rate was the lowest in US history.

I told you, they don't but accept that they do slip in as collateral damage to having an open border that they want.
Now you're pivoting to them wanting an open border. FYI open border means dangerous illegals here. Again the question remains.

No one wants dangerous illegals here. Not even as a collateral damage.

I understand that you like to be contrary but it's tiresome. No worse than being a troll.
 
Now you're pivoting to them wanting an open border. FYI open border means dangerous illegals here. Again the question remains.

They want an open border, and they want lots of illegal immigrants to come in. They accept that some criminals will slip in too even if they don't want them here.
No one wants dangerous illegals here. Not even as a collateral damage.

Then why the fight over guys like Abrego Garcia?
 
Grok, do Democrats support open borders?

No, Democrats generally do not support open borders. Most advocate for immigration reform that includes stronger border security, pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, and humanitarian protections, but not unrestricted entry. Policies vary among individuals, with some emphasizing enforcement and others focusing on compassion, but "open borders" as a literal policy is not a mainstream Democratic position.
 
Does that make sense to you? A court hearing would have established all the questions in debate. We would know what the father and the mother wanted. We could have established who was the legal guardian and who could take care of the child. Courts have ways to determine things and questioning a 2 year old is not one of them.
Already done, Sybil.
 
Now you're pivoting to them wanting an open border.
Inversion fallacy.
FYI open border means dangerous illegals here. Again the question remains.

No one wants dangerous illegals here. Not even as a collateral damage.
You do. Don't try to deny your own posts!
I understand that you like to be contrary but it's tiresome. No worse than being a troll.
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame YOUR problems on anybody else, Sybil.
 
Grok, do Democrats support open borders?

No, Democrats generally do not support open borders. Most advocate for immigration reform that includes stronger border security, pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, and humanitarian protections, but not unrestricted entry. Policies vary among individuals, with some emphasizing enforcement and others focusing on compassion, but "open borders" as a literal policy is not a mainstream Democratic position.
Blatant lie (denial). DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS! DON'T TRY TO DENY THE TREASON OF BIDEN!
 
Back
Top