For you idiots, the alleged crimes!

Truth Detector said:
Trump could have told him to pound sand. But instead, he authorized payment on Cohen's invoices even grossing them up for tax purposes
Click to expand...
You just confessed that trump is guilty of "grossing up" fake payments for tax purposes, which is felony falsifying business records.

It is funny that you deny everything but the felony.
 
Truth Detector said:
Apparently, you know nothing about the law. Paying NDA money is not illegal and done all the time by people and businesses. It isn't "hush" money. That's a dumb leftist meme. Listing it as a LEGAL expense is not illegal. Grossing it up for tax purposes is not illegal and done all the time.

When you gross someone's pay up, the IRS is getting their money from that individual. Apparently, you know nothing about how the IRS or tax system works either.
Click to expand...
So you admit that trump used business money for a personal/political NDA, and not for a business expense?
 
Into the Night said:
He violated Article I, $7, 8, and 9 of the Constitution of the State of New York, and the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States, he tainted the jury, rendering their verdict useless, and is attempting to convict with no specification of crime.

RQAA
Click to expand...
The specific crime is falsifying business records.
 
Merchan's jury instructions sound a lot like this:

“It is not necessary to accept everything as true, one must only accept it as necessary.'

“The right understanding of any matter and a misunderstanding of the same matter do not wholly exclude each other.”

― Franz Kafka, The Trial
 
Walt said:
How is the jury "tainted"?
Click to expand...

By allowing prejudicial and salacious testimony from Daniels for one.

By not allowing the defense to put an FEC professional on the stand to testify what constitutes election fraud.

By not allowing a former justice official to testify to his conversations with his client at the time, Cohen, and how he stated on numerous occasions he had nothing on Trump. Worse, then sending everyone out of the room to scold said official for daring to roll his eyes. Thin skinned I would say.

Lastly, he sustained every objection no matter how frivolous from the Prosecution while overruling every objection the defense made.

It was, indeed, a clown show.
 
Walt said:
You just confessed that trump is guilty of "grossing up" fake payments for tax purposes, which is felony falsifying business records.
Click to expand...

Grossing up for tax purposes isn't a crime you dimwitted know-nothing. Good lord. This is why I don't like arguing with uneducated fools.

How are they "fake" payments? That is a moronic statement.

Walt said:
It is funny that you deny everything but the felony.
Click to expand...

It is funny that you don't know what a felony is.
 
Walt said:
So you admit that trump used business money for a personal/political NDA, and not for a business expense?
Click to expand...

Using one's business money to pay an attorney is not illegal. NDAs are not illegal. They happen all the time. I wish you had a brain. Then we could have a coherent debate without having to lecture you on how the real world works most of the time.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Merchan's jury instructions sound a lot like this:

“It is not necessary to accept everything as true, one must only accept it as necessary.'
Click to expand...
Reasonable advice. You do not have to accept a case is 100% true. You just have to be 99% sure of the important bits to find for the prosecution. You can even be 100% sure parts are a lie, as long as it is not important to the case.
 
Walt said:
Reasonable advice. You do not have to accept a case is 100% true. You just have to be 99% sure of the important bits to find for the prosecution. You can even be 100% sure parts are a lie, as long as it is not important to the case.
Click to expand...
So, if you're say 97% sure you should acquit? How about 80% sure? How low will you set the Limbo pole?
 
Walt said:
It was not a business expense. It had nothing to do with the business. It was not a legal fee.
Click to expand...
It is a business expense.
He was paying a lawyer.
Walt said:
trump made the claim it was a personal expense, not a campaign expense, but that still is not a business expense.
Click to expand...
Trump is correct.
Walt said:
You cannot just business expense personal spending, or even worse yet business expense campaign spending. It is a felony.
Click to expand...
Not a crime. No such felony crime.
 
Walt said:
The specific crime is falsifying business records.
Click to expand...

Yet that was unproven. Falsifying business records is not a felony. It's a misdemeanor and in this case, one who was long past the Statute of Limitations.

If you are going to argue something, at least come with some factual understanding of the case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top