Best way to Stop School Shootings?

You are a repellent human being.

Legion has gotten worse ever since Damo castrated him a year ago.

Legion 12b
Legion has violated rule 12b and because of his being very familiar with the rule he is banned for 7 days.

7cnsrs.jpg
 
Getting back to the original topic....

We can confiscate all privately owned firearms. That would be very hard.

We can close all the schools. Looking at the comments on JPP, it almost looks as if we've done that already.

Or, we can realize that the above two possibilities are the only ways to do it,
neither of them is ever going to happen,
so we have to get used to shootings being a uniquely American way of life.

I did the latter decades ago.
 
Anyone who complains about how poorly boys and men are treated in the world is an incel and can't be taken seriously. Dumb Ass Gardner also thinks that every school employee is a woman.

He's a troll. Probably on china payroll. The Chinese are trolling social media hard to get Trump elected because they know it would be devastating for America.
 
Getting back to the original topic....

We can confiscate all privately owned firearms. That would be very hard.

We can close all the schools. Looking at the comments on JPP, it almost looks as if we've done that already.

Or, we can realize that the above two possibilities are the only ways to do it,
neither of them is ever going to happen,
so we have to get used to shootings being a uniquely American way of life.

I did the latter decades ago.

Our God is Mammon here in the US but we still sacrifice our children to Molech of Guns. We deserve the country we wind up with.
 
And they all mistreat boys, right? According to your numbers, one out of four boys have male teachers. You don't even understand your own statistics.

You clearly don't get the concept here. If boys don't have role models to follow, and women alone don't provide any real socialization for them, then they can grow up in a void that leaves them unequipped to become adults. It is no different than single parent households where only the mother is present. That to is a recognized issue in the causation of criminals.

Thus, many studies demonstrate that growing up in a single-parent family entails risks that jeopardize adolescents’ future life chances. Involvement in criminal behavior is another important risk factor for adolescents’ future life chances. Involvement in crime during adolescence is associated with negative life outcomes such as lower income, worse health outcome, lower well-being, and a higher probability of adult crime involvement
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1774589

The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. Fathers typically offer economic stability, a role model for boys, greater household security, and reduced stress for mothers. This is especially true for families with adolescent boys, the most crime-prone cohort. Children from single-parent families are more prone than children from two-parent families to use drugs, be gang members, be expelled from school, be committed to reform institutions, and become juvenile murderers.
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-l...-cause-juvenile-crime-juvenile-crime-opposing

U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-ta...other-countries-to-live-with-just-one-parent/

Research has shown that the lack of male educators in early childhood education is greatly influenced by the associations of early education with mothering and being “natural” for women, while men interested in the field were “unnatural” or deviants. However, having men in the classroom can create positive male role models for children, and redefine the idea of masculinity.
https://www.pacificoaks.edu/voices/...hildren, and redefine the idea of masculinity.

Male teacher shortage affects boys who need role models
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-affects-boys-who-need-role-models/103585138/
 
Getting back to the original topic....

We can confiscate all privately owned firearms. That would be very hard.

We can close all the schools. Looking at the comments on JPP, it almost looks as if we've done that already.

Or, we can realize that the above two possibilities are the only ways to do it,
neither of them is ever going to happen,
so we have to get used to shootings being a uniquely American way of life.

I did the latter decades ago.

The biggest impediment to it would be the cost. To unilaterally confiscate all or most private firearms and ammunition would require the just compensation of the owner for that. That would run well over a trillion dollars. It would literally be unaffordable, and the time and cost involved would probably double the cost of compensation. The government could not simply give some trivial sum either. That would go to court and be tossed immediately.
 
well that's a fucking lie. nearly all of you leftist fucks here want to take our guns.

Are you that simple? We recognize that the gun manufacturers won. We add 20 million guns a year to your arsenals. The one simple fact is there are no guns being taken away. We will add more and more guns. We will have more and more school shootings and mass shootings. That is how you gun lovers want it and you won.
 
The biggest impediment to it would be the cost. To unilaterally confiscate all or most private firearms and ammunition would require the just compensation of the owner for that. That would run well over a trillion dollars. It would literally be unaffordable, and the time and cost involved would probably double the cost of compensation. The government could not simply give some trivial sum either. That would go to court and be tossed immediately.

not to mention the attrition rate would decimate the confiscators.
 
not to mention the attrition rate would decimate the confiscators.

If talk would decimate us, we would have been gone long ago. You are just so tough. You drink the tears of the children cowering in their classrooms. The parents burying their children do not matter to you. I want my guns, fuck you all and die a violent death.
 
The biggest impediment to it would be the cost. To unilaterally confiscate all or most private firearms and ammunition would require the just compensation of the owner for that. That would run well over a trillion dollars. It would literally be unaffordable, and the time and cost involved would probably double the cost of compensation. The government could not simply give some trivial sum either. That would go to court and be tossed immediately.

I actually agree with you on this. It can't be done.

Closing all the schools OK instead?
Americans seem to be idiots anyway.
We live mostly to cap one another's asses,
so why do we need schools?
 
If talk would decimate us, we would have been gone long ago. You are just so tough. You drink the tears of the children cowering in their classrooms. The parents burying their children do not matter to you. I want my guns, fuck you all and die a violent death.

the parents burying their children should have took a stand and demanded armed police or security in their schools instead of lamenting the fact that government has no duty to protect them, so blame it on everyone else.

fuck you and die a violent death. we all know that the first person you call when threatened by a criminal with a gun is someone with a gun.
 
the parents burying their children should have took a stand and demanded armed police or security in their schools instead of lamenting the fact that government has no duty to protect them, so blame it on everyone else.

fuck you and die a violent death. we all know that the first person you call when threatened by a criminal with a gun is someone with a gun.

How would that have stopped your hero Timothy McVeigh from murdering 168 Americans, 19 of them children?
 
You clearly don't get the concept here. If boys don't have role models to follow, and women alone don't provide any real socialization for them, then they can grow up in a void that leaves them unequipped to become adults. It is no different than single parent households where only the mother is present. That to is a recognized issue in the causation of criminals.

Thus, many studies demonstrate that growing up in a single-parent family entails risks that jeopardize adolescents’ future life chances. Involvement in criminal behavior is another important risk factor for adolescents’ future life chances. Involvement in crime during adolescence is associated with negative life outcomes such as lower income, worse health outcome, lower well-being, and a higher probability of adult crime involvement
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1774589

The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. Fathers typically offer economic stability, a role model for boys, greater household security, and reduced stress for mothers. This is especially true for families with adolescent boys, the most crime-prone cohort. Children from single-parent families are more prone than children from two-parent families to use drugs, be gang members, be expelled from school, be committed to reform institutions, and become juvenile murderers.
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-l...-cause-juvenile-crime-juvenile-crime-opposing

U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-ta...other-countries-to-live-with-just-one-parent/

Research has shown that the lack of male educators in early childhood education is greatly influenced by the associations of early education with mothering and being “natural” for women, while men interested in the field were “unnatural” or deviants. However, having men in the classroom can create positive male role models for children, and redefine the idea of masculinity.
https://www.pacificoaks.edu/voices/...hildren, and redefine the idea of masculinity.

Male teacher shortage affects boys who need role models
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-affects-boys-who-need-role-models/103585138/

Boys having female teachers does not cause them to shoot people. It also interests me how desperately "conservatives" want to get inside people's homes and bedrooms. Raise your own families right and obsess over something besides the private lives of strangers.
 
You clearly don't get the concept here. If boys don't have role models to follow, and women alone don't provide any real socialization for them, then they can grow up in a void that leaves them unequipped to become adults. It is no different than single parent households where only the mother is present. That to is a recognized issue in the causation of criminals.

Thus, many studies demonstrate that growing up in a single-parent family entails risks that jeopardize adolescents’ future life chances. Involvement in criminal behavior is another important risk factor for adolescents’ future life chances. Involvement in crime during adolescence is associated with negative life outcomes such as lower income, worse health outcome, lower well-being, and a higher probability of adult crime involvement
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1774589

The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. Fathers typically offer economic stability, a role model for boys, greater household security, and reduced stress for mothers. This is especially true for families with adolescent boys, the most crime-prone cohort. Children from single-parent families are more prone than children from two-parent families to use drugs, be gang members, be expelled from school, be committed to reform institutions, and become juvenile murderers.
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-l...-cause-juvenile-crime-juvenile-crime-opposing

U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-ta...other-countries-to-live-with-just-one-parent/

Research has shown that the lack of male educators in early childhood education is greatly influenced by the associations of early education with mothering and being “natural” for women, while men interested in the field were “unnatural” or deviants. However, having men in the classroom can create positive male role models for children, and redefine the idea of masculinity.
https://www.pacificoaks.edu/voices/...hildren, and redefine the idea of masculinity.

Male teacher shortage affects boys who need role models
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-affects-boys-who-need-role-models/103585138/

I rarely agree with you, but I do in this case. I had a terrific father. Great role model. Now, even at my age of 69, I still use his examples in my life. But, I consider my first male teacher in 5th grade the best one I ever had. I don’t know if it was intentional, but that age is perfect for boys to have a male teacher. I still think about him often. So do my grade school classmates that I still keep in contact with
 
How would that have stopped your hero Timothy McVeigh from murdering 168 Americans, 19 of them children?

quit crying, coward. you know you accept kids being murdered as collateral damage. the only issue you have is who is murdering kids. you're ok when it's government, traitor
 
Back
Top