Armed Citizen Stops Shooter at Indiana Mall: GOOD GUY WITH A GUN
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
Your gun also has a tremendous power over people.
But unlike the FBI and USSS, you never passed any test or screening.
OK, but you JUST SAID that you're a monster and violent person, and aren't you supposedly protecting yourself from monsters and violent people by buying a gun?
What makes them violent monsters, but not you?
Then prove me wrong and go get yourself screened and tested!
Easy solution!
I'd happily and eagerly allow you to dunk on me here if you took and passed the same screenings and tests that they take.
But something tells me that you wouldn't even get that far...you'd be disqualified because of your lack of self-control which led you to be a part of a violent, fascist terrorist group who also make the same threats you make here every day.
Were you exhibiting self-control by joining that group, or by leaving it?
You're the one who said that if we droned you, that dozens of other families would be collateral damage, which means you'd be hiding behind them as human shields.
That's what you're doing right now...right this very instant,you're making threats from behind two shields; the shield of anonymity of JPP, and the physical human shields in your neighborhood.
All while telling US to leave YOU alone.
If you truly want to be left alone, then isolation is your only option.
You don't get to go into society with an excuse to harm someone, while telling everyone to leave you alone. That's childish. And stupid because there will always be an asshole who won't leave you alone because society has a lot of assholes.
You aren't entitled to that. You aren't entitled to "be left alone" unless you're isolating yourself from society.
Seems to me that you want all the benefits of society, but don't want to do any of the work.
You want people to leave you alone as you barge into their space waving a gun around and making threats.
Well, society doesn't work like that.
MUCH BULLSHIT I DON'T HAVE TO SEE. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THE STALINISTS ARE HYSTERICAL OVER AN AMRED CITIZEN STOPPING A PSUCHO SHOOTER, ESPECIALLY BEFORE THE LEFT'S "DESIRED DEATH TOLL" WAS REACHED.
THE STALINISTS ARE HYSTERICAL OVER AN AMRED CITIZEN STOPPING A PSUCHO SHOOTER, ESPECIALLY BEFORE THE LEFT'S "DESIRED DEATH TOLL" WAS REACHED.
He didn't stop the shooter before he killed three people.
And neither of them were allowed to bring those guns there either.
He was no hero, he was a bad guy with a gun who shot another bad guy with a gun.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you're embarrassing the shit out of yourself right now. This isn't even thinking or logic, it's just blathering idiocy
Come on.
Now you're saying the government would show restraint after arguing all this time that you need guns because they won't!
SEE THE HYSTERICS GROWING^^^^^^^^^ 
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
In the last 40 years or so, the gun manufacturers through their mouthpiece the NRA and various flunkies in Congress and the media ran all types of commercials, documentaries, books, lectures telling America that ANY gun control legislation was a slippery slope to total gun confiscation and banning for the civilian population.
In all that time, the closest cousin to those predictions were the state laws that required home weapons to be unloaded and locked when not in use. This was to prevent theft and mind you, there were no reported enforcements of such a law (cops barging into a home and demanding to see how guns were stored), save for a plot device for TV action dramas...even Washington, DC relaxed it laws, and they were the strictest in the country at one point.
But NO CONFISCATION OF LEGALLY PURCHASED WEAPONS.
Even with the Brady Bill and the 1994 AWB, a plethora of revolvers, semi-auto rifles and gun, shot guns, etc., were available to law abiding citizens general population who could afford them. Individual state laws determined criteria for purchase/ownership in conjunction with federal mandates. And crime rates did not shoot off the charts.
And when the 1994 AWB was not renewed (thanks to the GOP vote), the very weapon(s) that were on that list have been the ones of choice used by mass shooting perpetrators.
Matters of facts, matter of history that consistent gun flunky mantras just can't shake.
In all that time, the closest cousin to those predictions were the state laws that required home weapons to be unloaded and locked when not in use. This was to prevent theft and mind you, there were no reported enforcements of such a law (cops barging into a home and demanding to see how guns were stored), save for a plot device for TV action dramas...even Washington, DC relaxed it laws, and they were the strictest in the country at one point.
But NO CONFISCATION OF LEGALLY PURCHASED WEAPONS.
Even with the Brady Bill and the 1994 AWB, a plethora of revolvers, semi-auto rifles and gun, shot guns, etc., were available to law abiding citizens general population who could afford them. Individual state laws determined criteria for purchase/ownership in conjunction with federal mandates. And crime rates did not shoot off the charts.
And when the 1994 AWB was not renewed (thanks to the GOP vote), the very weapon(s) that were on that list have been the ones of choice used by mass shooting perpetrators.
Matters of facts, matter of history that consistent gun flunky mantras just can't shake.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
And your point?
A bunch of stupid ass amateurs meet a STORE OWNER who was licensed and using his legal weapon as intended. He is NOT walking around the neighborhood strapped 24/7 or is some yahoo 18 year old walking into a gun shop and buying assault weapons and a ton of ammo without so much as a waiting period!
Also, where/how did the crook get that assault rifle?
Think it through.
ExpressLane
Verified User
He shot my arm off!!!
Another thug "disarmed".
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
No shit, sherlock. How does this change one iota of the validity of what I wrote? Got an answer to the question? Or will you just fall back to another mindless meme to avoid conceding a point or answering the question?
The store owner was a lousy shot.
ExpressLane
Verified User
*80 years old and had a AR 15 pointing at him. He still stopped the robbery and got the robbers caught. So he was a good enough shot.