Democrats pass idiotic assault weapon ban bill

T. A. Gardner said:
If I possess something of value, and the government suddenly makes a law making it illegal to sell, trade, or transfer that item to anyone else, they have taken the value of it. That falls under eminent domain and the government has to compensate me in full for that loss because they, and they alone caused it.
Click to expand...

Oh, there is a clause for a gun buyback in there. :rolleyes:
 
moon said:
Are mass shooters criminals in your shrunken head, scum-sucker ?
Click to expand...
Yes, you terrorist loving soy filled gimp, they are.

But that doesn't mean you take the guns away from everybody. Knee jerk, stupid fucks do things like that. ;)
 
Trumpet said:
Crime enthusiasts just love buying guns with no restrictions.
Click to expand...
Not always, you crime loving sociopath.

Law abiding citizens with ZERO records want to get by the bullshit restrictions proposed and sometimes enforced by democrat dictators.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
"My body, my choice." Both are medical procedures and both require a personal decision on their use.
Click to expand...

Twisted twumptard logic. Taking away a woman's right to choose is not the same thing as making sure you keep your community safe via vaccination. You're an evil twisted fuck if you believe otherwise.
 
Lionfish said:
what has this got to do with guns?
Click to expand...

Gardner claimed that any law or regulation that might prejudice commerce of ownership was an "eminent domain" taking, and so must be compensated. I just pointed out another case where that could happen. If you repeal Obamacare, that would be hundreds of billions a year that Gardner would want you to have to pay.

The reality is that the assault weapons ban is not a taking under eminent domain. No compensation is owed.

Lionfish said:
As for the assault weapons ban, it has no meaning, the SC has already ruled on this and it will go nowhere.
Click to expand...

Supreme Courts has not struck down the assault weapons ban, yet. We had one before, that sunsetted, but was not struck down. Of course, the Supreme Court is allowed to rule whatever they want, but it would be interesting to get them on record saying that criminals can have any type of weapon they like.

Just a reminder, there is still a machine gun ban, which if the Supreme Court strikes down the assault weapons ban, they will also strike that down.
 
LurchAddams said:
Twisted twumptard logic. Taking away a woman's right to choose is not the same thing as making sure you keep your community safe via vaccination. You're an evil twisted fuck if you believe otherwise.
Click to expand...

STFU you fuckin' Nazi wannabe.

You would be a Nazi if you had the balls or the ass to do something; But you don't, pussy.
 
Walt said:
Gardner claimed that any law or regulation that might prejudice commerce of ownership was an "eminent domain" taking, and so must be compensated. I just pointed out another case where that could happen. If you repeal Obamacare, that would be hundreds of billions a year that Gardner would want you to have to pay.

The reality is that the assault weapons ban is not a taking under eminent domain. No compensation is owed.



Supreme Courts has not struck down the assault weapons ban, yet. We had one before, that sunsetted, but was not struck down. Of course, the Supreme Court is allowed to rule whatever they want, but it would be interesting to get them on record saying that criminals can have any type of weapon they like.

Just a reminder, there is still a machine gun ban, which if the Supreme Court strikes down the assault weapons ban, they will also strike that down.
Click to expand...

I understand you are afraid of guns. If reading to completion bothers you more, you may consider moving to Canada.

There is no machine gun ban, and certain full-auto guns can be owned by citizens. Yes, even cannons.

As for "assault weapons"

Read form 4473 for restrictions on "criminals" (among others) that are not allowed to be in the possession of a firearm.
 
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner said:
They have to pay full value, they can't say "Oh, we'll give you $50 for your $3000 gun..." and be done with it. But that is what the gun grabbers will try to do.
Click to expand...

Trust me, in order to disarm America, they will come up with unlimited funds. Money is no object for them to achieve that.

What happens in the end is not good, though.

kDAUPkP.jpg
 
Matt Dillon said:
I'd like to hope not. We know they're thinking it, though. They wish they could get the military on board with their treasonous plans.
Click to expand...

even WITH the military, they do not have the numbers. you're talking 20 million to 4 million. what's happening right now, and has been happening for decades, is watching the establishment, along with their cultist bases, pit us against each other..........it's why they don't fucking fear us, because any semblance of unity has to be torn down by partisan bullshit accusations...........there can be no unity because the anger, hatred, fear, outright rage at each other kills us all. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so devastating to us as free people.........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top