Armed Citizen Stops Shooter at Indiana Mall: GOOD GUY WITH A GUN

LV426 said:
How did the mass shooter even kill 3 people to begin with?

Who sold him the guns and ammo?

Also, here's what usually happens when dumbasses just start shooting each other:

Man charged in shootout after robbing Wellston store patron of rifle, police say
Police said a man was robbed of his rifle, and then grabbed another gun and began shooting at the suspect. The alleged robber is recovering at an area hospital.
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/c...arket/63-d569c7f8-e6ba-4f09-9181-bd73079d7b1a
Click to expand...

So you want to disarm the average responsible gun owners? Fuck you and die.
 
LV426 said:
Yes, do you?

Er um...by guns. The biggest killer of young Black men is other young Black men with guns.

Guns...otherwise known as the thing I want to ban.

So like volsrock, are you also illiterate and have a helper monkey reading these posts to you?
Click to expand...

Yes.

Guns, like cars and hammers, are just tools. All can be lethal in the hands of a nutjob. Why do you want to allow such people to vote?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Cruz was clearly nuts. The cops knew he was nuts and he'd been visited by police. Why wasn't he given the help he needed?
Click to expand...

Well gee, Dutch, who is the one here who has done everything he can to stop and oppose Medicare For All, which would extend mental health services to people like him? Oh right, YOU'RE THE ONE.

So as always, you are the impediment to solving the problem you are also complaining about.
 
LV426 said:
Which has nothing to do with guns.




What "right" am I supposedly stripping? You can still arm yourself with knives, swords, bows, crossbows, airguns, bb guns, machetes...hell, grab a baseball bat and wrap it in barbed wire like Negan did for all I care.

You still have a right to bear arms, just not guns.




Incorrect because I don't stroll into places with concealed guns where they're not allowed.

But your "hero" did that.

So your "hero" broke the rules, which would make him a bad guy with a gun, right? Bad guys break the rules, don't they?

So it wasn't a "good guy with a gun" who brought down a "bad guy with a gun", it was two bad guys with guns who were shooting, and one shot the other.
Click to expand...

You want my guns? Come and get em, wimp. I know you ain't got the balls because

:youracunt:
 
RB 60 said:
So you want to disarm the average responsible gun owners? Fuck you and die.
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as a "responsible gun owner" because everyone is a "responsible gun owner" right up until the moment they aren't.

That's a bar that is so low, it's lying on the fucking floor.

My cat is a responsible gun owner by that standard, that's how fucking stupid it is.

And can't you defend yourself without a gun, or do you need the bang bang to make you feel like a man?
 
LV426 said:
There is no such thing as a "responsible gun owner" because everyone is a "responsible gun owner" right up until the moment they aren't.

That's a bar that is so low, it's lying on the fucking floor.

My cat is a responsible gun owner by that standard, that's how fucking stupid it is.

And can't you defend yourself without a gun, or do you need the bang bang to make you feel like a man?
Click to expand...

You lose again. Like I said, you want my guns, come and get em' I'll be waiting...
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Why do you want to allow such people to vote?
Click to expand...

Why do you want to ban people from voting, is the more apropos question?

I think it's because you realize that if everyone participated in our democracy, your voice would carry far less influence because no one would give a shit about it.
 
LV426 said:
I wouldn't be so sure about that.

Guns are a drug, and just like any drug, people get addicted to them.

Addicted To Bang: The Neuroscience of the Gun
https://www.forbes.com/sites/steven...-the-neuroscience-of-the-gun/?sh=6719cbf57eed

And those who are addicted to guns see using those guns as compulsory and sole response to criminal behavior, even if that criminal behavior is non-violent.

You have said yourself that you're willing to murder people over non-violent crimes, so there's a pretty strong connection between the feeling you get holding and/or firing a gun, and the motivation to fire it.

Since your brain is wired to release highly addictive dopamine when you fire that gun, the more you fire it, the more dopamine your brain releases.

So the gun very much causes you to fire it because the gun triggers the release of dopamine in your brain.
Click to expand...

this is such a bullshit article ROFL
 
LV426 said:
First of all, you promised us that allowing any type of carry, closed or open, serves as a deterrent. Except when it doesn't, which is always. What that means is that mass shooter KNEW there was closed carry laws in IN and still proceeded to shoot up the place anyway.

Secondly, you don't know any of that...that's just what the cops said, and as we've learned from Uvalde, cops lie.

Thirdly, that guy was breaking the law by carrying the gun where he wasn't supposed to, and didn't decide to use it until 3 people had already been shot and killed.

Fourthly, IN has open AND closed carry laws, which you have argued here MANY TIMES serve as a deterrent to mass shootings. Except when they don't, which is always.

So before, you said concealed carry would deter mass shootings, and now you're moving the bar again to say open carrying deters mass shootings, except that doesn't happen either since mass shootings still occur in states with open carry ALL THE FUCKING TIME.
Click to expand...

everything you've said here is wrong or a lie........
 
LV426 said:
Who says that? The cops?

Cops lie, moron.

Also, by killing that guy, we don't get to put him on trial, the families of the victims don't get justice, we don't get a motive, and we don't know how to stop this ffrom happening again.

Because Howdy Doody had to play Dirty Harry.
Click to expand...

let me guess, you'd rather be raped and murdered than saved by howdy doody carrying his gun, wouldn't you?
 
LV426 said:
Yes for multiple reasons:

1. He didn't save anyone, THREE PEOPLE WERE KILLED before he could be bothered to pull his gun.

2. By brainlessly killing and not wounding the shooter, he denied all of us the opportunity to put him on trial and get the victims' families the justice they deserve, and also denied us the opportunity to learn the motivation so that we can prevent this from happening again.

3. He didn't deter the shooting...it still happened.

4. It's the cops who are saying this.

5. He wasn't a "good guy" SINCE HE KNOWINGLY BROUGHT A GUN INTO A GUN FREE ZONE.

So right up until the moment he shot the mass shooter, your hero was a bad guy with a gun.
Click to expand...

ROFL..........your anger and hatred has left you completely insane.......completely
 
LV426 said:
Well gee, Dutch, who is the one here who has done everything he can to stop and oppose Medicare For All, which would extend mental health services to people like him? Oh right, YOU'RE THE ONE.

So as always, you are the impediment to solving the problem you are also complaining about.
Click to expand...

You’re free to scream lies all you want, LV, but that doesn’t make them true. People like you turn complex issues into a B&W blame-games where nothing is ever your fault. Do you really believe that helps or do you just spread hate around so you can feel better about yourself?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top