actually in trials there is a defense counsel who presents the parts the prosecution skips......it IS a dishonest practice when there isn't.......
bingo - it becomes a kangaroo court. say it again - political theatre.
actually in trials there is a defense counsel who presents the parts the prosecution skips......it IS a dishonest practice when there isn't.......
Trump deserves to be in prison for life.
Says the person who thinks that "hearings" held by a select committee chosen (or rejected) individually and specifically by the partisan speaker of the house is not partisan.
The hole is the one the left is digging. I wonder when they'll realize they forgot to include an exit path.
Refusing to address the evidence is telling.
Hannity did not realize Trump organized the coup.
What fact are you disputing?
That his advisors told him he had lost.
That his advisors and experts on the subject told him there was no fraud.
That he attempted to remain in office after his term expired?
But address the evidence, I understand you do not like the committee, but its telling that nobody wants to address the evidence itself.
Bill Barr, Sean Hannity, Mark Meadows? All Liberal hacks? Trumps head election lawyer? The Data analysis for the campaign?
Are the Trump supporters who killed the cop murdering POS as well?
She wouldn’t seat Jordan, who is a clown, they gave McCarthy other options. Jordan may well be part of the inquiry. Pelosi was right to reject anyone involved in the coup. McCarthy refused to add other members to the roster. Cheney and Kinszinger volunteered because they place country over party.
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/21/1018...the-jan-6-panel-citing-integrity-of-the-probe
So.. argue against the evidence they presented? Tell me what is incorrect?
refusing to allow the other side to present their version of the evidence makes it a kangaroo court and political theatre
I thought IT was when Trump was convicted. So if IT finally did happen what’s the point of rehashing old news? A desperate attempt to mitigate what will happen in November?
Refusing to address the evidence is telling.
Seems you agree this isn’t going anywhere. Although I don’t find it interesting since it’s just a rehash of what we already knew. At least I did. Maybe the replay helps soothe your angst about Brandon’s poor ratings. And that’s ok.
Nobody is preventing them from making their sides case...
Also it does not mean the evidence or argument are wrong.
post some evidence of a crime......then we can question whether its correct or not......its been a year and a half and no one has done it yet.....
Nobody is preventing them from making their sides case...
.
Where did I ever say I supported Trump? If the point is not having him convicted then what’s the ultimate goal of the hearing?
bullshit