Breyer retiring

cawacko said:
Leandra Kreuger from California is the other name being mentioned. She's only 45 so six years younger than Jackson and it sounds like slightly more moderate. Both seem to have strong credentials.
Click to expand...

Beside the main ones - a vagina and the desired amount of a certain genetic disposition?

What are they?
 
Loose Vagina 426 said:
archer-stop-my-penis-can-only-get-so-erect.gif


dick-swamy.gif
Click to expand...

So, not much.
 
Legion said:
Bungling Biden pledged to put a black woman on the Supreme Court.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/problem-biden-s-pledge-black-woman-justice-n1200826

No others need apply.
Click to expand...

Hmm..seems a bit racist.. :thinking:

What's wrong with whoever is best qualified?

I mean, I love me some American Black women, and if one of them is best qualified, that'd be fuckin' awesome! But what if the best qualified is not that?

I see no reason to discriminate against the best qualified for the job by race.
 
Hello cawacko,

cawacko said:
Huh? He ran on a platform of selecting a black woman to the Supreme Court. Black women are arguably his most loyal supporters. His poll numbers are already low, select anyone but a black woman and you'll see true tanking.
Click to expand...

According to Republicans his polls have already done that. So it is not 'true?'
 
Phantasmal said:
Nope, it’s past time. What was wrong was appointing only white male judges for as long as they did.
Click to expand...

What if a black woman is the 4th best choice at the time?

What is this "Affirmative Action" bullshit?

PS: I disagree, it's racist and sexist as can be.
 
Last edited:
Legion said:
Huh?
Click to expand...

Oh! You didn't know?

Kavanaugh, who was Kennedy's secretary for years, IS who rewrote "Obamacare" so it passed the SC as a tax.

How did you not know this? :dunno:

1st there's this, which he probably should have recused from..https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-spares-obamacare-gop-challenge-n1271140

Then there's this and this. There are other references to that I speak of..

"Finally, and most damningly, “Kavanaugh’s discussion of those issues did provide something of a roadmap to the Obama administration and John Roberts,” Cannon argued. In his book “Unprecedented: The Constitutional Challenge to Obamacare,” law professor Josh Blackman argued that Kavanaugh gave Verrilli an “assist” to help Verrilli argue for the constitutionality of Obamacare’s individual mandate."


https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...rt-pick-brett-kavanaugh-save-obamacare-n59488

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_...462647556&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr

and this..from 2012..

https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2012/07/edward-white-aca-rewrite/

As Kennedy's secretary, he gave a literal "assist" as well. ;)
 
Last edited:
Maybe Breyer didn't jump. Maybe he was pushed

There are indications that retirement wasn’t a choice for Justice Breyer, who has remained an active participant in the court’s proceedings and maintained a vigorous public schedule, writing books and speaking to legal organizations and student groups.

  • Breyer hasn’t made public any particular health issues.
  • Breyer has championed the court’s independence from politics and spoken out against proposals by DEMOCRATS to dilute conservative power by expanding the court with additional seat bungling Biden could fill.
  • The public campaign pushing Justice Breyer to go may have increased his reluctance to step down, for fear of suggesting that strategic objectives motivated his decision.
Still, months of sometimes strident demands from the left—one pressure group hired a billboard truck to drive around Capitol Hill with the message, “Breyer, retire”—didn’t go unnoticed.

“It isn’t really true that I was born on Pluto and don’t know what’s going on in the world. I think I do,” he told The Wall Street Journal....


https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-to-retire-11643219955


:thinking:
 
Hello cawacko,

You said: " His poll numbers are already low, select anyone but a black woman and you'll see true tanking."

I said: "According to Republicans his polls have already done that. So it is not 'true?'"

and now you are saying:

cawacko said:
I am not following you here. What does this have to do with what I said?
Click to expand...

And I am now wondering what is unclear about my reply.

Basically, you can't have it both ways.

Polls which have 'tanked' cannot tank if they have already tanked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top