Here is another article that is not info wars.:
https://nationalfile.com/bombshell-...r-pics-after-reports-they-include-child-porn/
https://nationalfile.com/bombshell-...r-pics-after-reports-they-include-child-porn/
Same here.
Anyway I'll answer your OP.
First of all, it's "underage obsessions", not "child porn".
Second of all, it's not about accuracy.
Third of all, it's a lone reporter from OAN who claimed to have seen the laptop.
Here is another article:
https://nationalfile.com/bombshell-...r-pics-after-reports-they-include-child-porn/
https://www.infowars.com/posts/did-hunter-bidens-laptop-contain-pedophilic-content/
Did Hunter's laptop contain child porn? If you are a lefty and agree with what this article has to say, just discredit the source instead of the content. If you don't think the article is correct, tell us what is inaccurate in the content.
It's not like CNN is going to run this story, right? The lefty media will only censor it.
I am not surprised that Hunter is into sexually exploiting children, being that he is a lefty and all.
It was not Biden's laptop. This story has been blown apart.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-new-york-post-story/
Same here.
Anyway I'll answer your OP.
First of all, it's "underage obsessions", not "child porn".
Second of all, it's not about accuracy.
Third of all, it's a lone reporter from OAN who claimed to have seen the laptop.
It was not Biden's laptop. This story has been blown apart.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-new-york-post-story/
Yes. "Underage obsessions", whatever that means.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/did-hunter-bidens-laptop-contain-pedophilic-content/
Did Hunter's laptop contain child porn? If you are a lefty and agree with what this article has to say, just discredit the source instead of the content. If you don't think the article is correct, tell us what is inaccurate in the content.
Quit playing stupid, you know what that means. Playing stupid is a form of evasion.
A big news story that comes from a Tweet and involves Rudy Giuliani are good reasons to be skeptical.
Should Hunter Biden's activities determine voting choice when Trump's own personal conduct did not?
Will that link contain evidence that proves it was not hunter's laptop?
A big news story that comes from a Tweet and involves Rudy Giuliani are good reasons to be skeptical.