Was Hiroshima an act of terrorism?

Dutch Uncle said:
Where did you grow up and where do you live because I've never seen it. I was a military dependent and then in the military myself for over 20 years. I lived in over a dozen homes and went to almost a dozen different schools in different areas before I was 18. What region of the world taught you that lying about others is good? What region of the world taught you to make bald-faced lies about those who disagree with you?:
Click to expand...

Ah, Military. All explained.
 
BRUTALITOPS said:
liberals are such pussy losers, always needed to wring their hands with guilt. It disgusts me that the gene pool has produced such obvious malformed individuals. They would be the first ones dead in any almost any natural setting where the streets weren't paved with concrete.
Click to expand...

That's because the RW blocks abortions. If it was up to me, abortions would be on demand at cost. Is there any doubt there'd be a lot less dumbasses as a result? Accidents happen, but mostly it's the dumbasses who get unintentionally pregnant: exactly the people who shouldn't be getting pregnant and producing another idiot voter.

I'm also against seat belt laws, helmet laws and any other nanny state laws which prevent these numbnuts from removing themselves from the gene pool before they reproduce.
 
Penderyn said:
Ah - I see what you are getting at. I don't suppose you were around at all, and I said 'your kind'. Aren't you normally a Republican? They were very much against seeing Hitler off, surely?
Click to expand...
Your delusions are mildly interesting. What does ever being a Republican have to do with being happy to kill Hitler, Stalin, Tojo, Mao, Putin and all the other dictatorial assholes who cause problems for millions of people?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
That's because the RW blocks abortions. If it was up to me, abortions would be on demand at cost. Is there any doubt there'd be a lot less dumbasses as a result? Accidents happen, but mostly it's the dumbasses who get unintentionally pregnant: exactly the people who shouldn't be getting pregnant and producing another idiot voter.

I'm also against seat belt laws, helmet laws and any other nanny state laws which prevent these numbnuts from removing themselves from the gene pool before they reproduce.
Click to expand...

Against seat belt and helmet laws ? I’m against paying to keep you alive in a végétative state for the next 30 years


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Your delusions are mildly interesting. What does ever being a Republican have to do with being happy to kill Hitler, Stalin, Tojo, Mao, Putin and all the other dictatorial assholes who cause problems for millions of people?
Click to expand...

The Republicans were the more pro-Hitler of the two parties at the time, and were happy to go along with real American nazis. You surely know that?
 
jpaysonp1 said:
Against seat belt and helmet laws ? I’m against paying to keep you alive in a végétative state for the next 30 years

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Then don't. I think it's cruel to keep a brain dead person strapped to a machine for 30 years. Why the fuck would you do that? Are you a sadist?

Sent from Cheyenne Mountain using SkyNet.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
That's not an answer to the question, dude.
Click to expand...

Yes, I did. You just did not like the answer.

The question is illegitimate and based on a false premise.

Would you murder 100,000 COVID patients now, to keep 200,000 from dying from COVID in the future?

This entire discussion revolves around your wish that we had launched a first strike nuclear attack on Russia in 1945.

You have not explained how you know it would only kill 100k, you have not explained how you are sure it would not have sparked a global world war 3, you have not explained how you would have had the magical powers of seeing the future from 1945, and knowing how many people Stalin would kill in the future.

Finally, you have not explained how a thermonuclear attack on Russia in 1945 would have any benefit for the victims of Stalin's crimes, most of whom died in the 1930s during the Great Terror, the purges, the Gulag.

Unless one us has the magical power of seeing the future, there is no legitimate way of calculating that we should kill one million people to save ten million in the future.

The way we actually deal with mortal risks we see on the future horizon is by planning, containment, wisdom, and decisive action. Not by thermonuclear attacks or murdering COVID patients.

That's about as much as I can write about nuclear fantasies and illegitimate questions. I leave you to your thoughts of a blackened Moscow in flames.
 
Cypress said:
Yes, I did. You just did not like the answer....
Click to expand...

Disagreed as proved by your reiterating the question back to me. Fine. You are not required to answer the question and are free to condemn the US use of atomic bombs to end WWII. You are free to support the Soviet Union and present day Russia. I'm free to disagree.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Disagreed as proved by your reiterating the question back to me. Fine. You are not required to answer the question and are free to condemn the US use of atomic bombs to end WWII. You are free to support the Soviet Union and present day Russia. I'm free to disagree.
Click to expand...

Almost everything you just wrote is false.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
LOL I've been called worse by people a lot smarter than you'll ever be. :)
Click to expand...

Take stock of yourself, nuke-head. I'm not looking for the WORST description of a pompous twat like you- just an apt description.
As for being smart- I'm not the nuke-head that lies and thinks it's OK to vaporize hundreds of thousands of civilians at a time. Best check your definition of ' smart '- 'cause you ain't it.

Haw, haw....................haw.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top