Christine Blasey Ford Was Really A Drunken Slut

For the same reason why we don't want to hear a liar testify that somebody is lying.

But she isn't accusing him of being a slut, she's accusing him of sexually assaulting her. You know if a woman enjoys sex, that doesn't make her a rapist, right?
 
Whoa, nobody is saying that a slut deserves to be raped. A slut's status as a slut is still relevant though, when the slut is making allegations. If her slut behavior involved fantasy rape for example, a jury would need to know all about it and would need to compare it to any current case that involves rape.

Again. Wrong. Sleeping with 10000 people doesn't alter the facts of a rape allegation. They are not relevant. Now if she had accused 1000 men of rape, that would be relevant.
 
But she isn't accusing him of being a slut, she's accusing him of sexually assaulting her. You know if a woman enjoys sex, that doesn't make her a rapist, right?

Being a slut is relevant to any allegations made against her many sexual partners. The more serious the allegations, the more relevant every detail of her sex life becomes.
 
Again. Wrong. Sleeping with 10000 people doesn't alter the facts of a rape allegation. They are not relevant. Now if she had accused 1000 men of rape, that would be relevant.

It does not sound like you know much about the jury selection process and what a jury of your peers will want to know about a sexual assault case. If somebody makes allegations of rape, a jury will absolutely want to know if the person role plays rape with thousands of casual sexual partners.
 
Being a slut is relevant to any allegations made against her many sexual partners. The more serious the allegations, the more relevant every detail of her sex life becomes.

Why? What does her having lots of consensual sex have to do with an allegation of sexual assault? I know you're a Trumpster, but you know there is a difference between consent and rape, right?
 
Now that it's all over the truth is beginning to come out:

Untitled-e1537463483404.jpg


BOMBSHELL: Blasey-Ford's HS Yearbooks Brag of Drunken Promiscuity, '54 Sex Partners Before College'

One friend, (identified briefly on social media) alleges Blasey-Ford (Holton Arms, Class of 1984) suffered no memory loss whatsoever in describing and bragging about her sexual conquests and paramours, identifying 54 sexual partners between her junior year of high school and enrollment in college. The social media post (below) claims Blasey-Ford previously allegedly admitted to being an alcoholic in high school and regretted, “being so easy,” in high school. She is alleged to have told the best friend that she had 54 sexual partners between 11th grade and enrollment in college. The post also identified Blasey-Ford as a liberal activist with an obvious sensitivity to Supreme Court ideology, once writing on social media, “Scalia-types must be banned from law!”

http://www.shadolsonshow.com/2018/0...n-promiscuity-54-sex-partners-before-college/

This is pure garbage from a garbage right wing site.
 
Why? What does her having lots of consensual sex have to do with an allegation of sexual assault? I know you're a Trumpster, but you know there is a difference between consent and rape, right?

A jury will not be so confident that anybody is guilty or innocent without knowing a whole lot of background about both parties involved. You can bet that the accuser's attorney would be REALLY busy trying to block a slut lifestyle from being used as evidence in a trial, and you can bet that the judge will be keen to it as well. While being a slut is not evidence of anything besides having lots of casual sex with lots of casual partners, there is a good reason why an accuser's attorney would be moving to exclude it.

Ever wonder why the MSM excludes such information on her? If it wasn't damaging, the MSM would report every detail of something like this.
 
A jury will not be so confident that anybody is guilty or innocent without knowing a whole lot of background about both parties involved. You can bet that the accuser's attorney would be REALLY busy trying to block a slut lifestyle from being used as evidence in a trial, and you can bet that the judge will be keen to it as well. While being a slut is not evidence of anything besides having lots of casual sex with lots of casual partners, there is a good reason why an accuser's attorney would be moving to exclude it.

Yes, because there is still a lot of sexism against women. Stupid people think that if a woman has a lot of sex, she's evil. That's why the attorney would try to exclude it.

Ever wonder why the MSM excludes such information on her? If it wasn't damaging, the MSM would report every detail of something like this.

Or maybe they exclude it because it has nothing to do with anything. Notice how the MSM also isn't talking about the kind of music Ford likes.
 
What everyone seems to be missing is the fact that Dr. Blasey-Ford is an expert on hypnosis, self-hypnosis, and using those techniques to replace memories with false memories.
 
Terri and the far rightys will believe and post anything that supports their conspiracies. This was expected. Did she claim to have Indian heritage? Did Trump pay her off for sex?
 
Kavanaugh Accuser Co-Authored Study Citing Use Of Hypnosis To Retrieve Memories

Excerpt:

An academic paper co-authored by Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford cited hypnosis as a way to retrieve traumatic memories.
OCTOBER 1, 2018 By Sean Davis
Christine Blasey Ford, a California woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of attempted rape in the 1980’s, co-authored an academic study that cited the use of hypnosis as a tool to retrieve memories in traumatized patients. The academic paper, entitled “Meditation With Yoga, Group Therapy With Hypnosis, and Psychoeducation for Long-Term Depressed Mood: A Randomized Pilot Trial,” described the results of a study that tested the efficacy of certain treatments on 46 depressed individuals. The study was published by the Journal of Clinical Psychology in May 2008.

While the paper by Ford and several other co-authors focused on whether various therapeutic techniques, including hypnosis, alleviate depression, it also discussed the therapeutic use of hypnosis to “assist in the retrieval of important memories” and to “create artificial situations” to assist in treatment.

https://thefederalist.com/2018/10/0...-study-citing-use-hypnosis-retrieve-memories/
 
You can't prove it's phony, Miss Marple.

My children's private school yearbooks are filled with advertisements. That's how they help pay for the printing.

I can cast serious doubt about its veracity, Mr. Earl. Follow along, please. This conspiracy theory against Dr. Ford started with Infowars a year ago.

Bombshell: Kavanaugh Accuser’s Salacious High School Yearbooks Scrubbed

Christine Blasey Ford’s yearbooks describe wild sex parties, blackouts, erotic male dancers

Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - September 20, 2018


"Jones posted the page above but even he and his partners in smear, The Cult of the First Amendment, (who's blog curiously disappeared from the internet ) did not identify the girl with the bar over her face as Christine Blasey. Nevertheless Jones persisted in saying she was that girl and calling her a hussy and a slut, based on the fact that the girl in the picture, still not identified as Blasey, was wearing a miniskirt."

Besides her official portrait, there is one picture of Blasey in the yearbook and this is it. It was a pic taken at a Halloween party.

chrissy-drinking-.jpg


Otherwise, the yearbook pages in question don’t include any information that reflects negatively on Ford or contradicts any part of her account during her testimony.

The odious Alex Jones continued his lying smears by suggesting the that girl who was posing in the picture was sending out the message ‘I want you to climb on top of me right now,’” before claiming she “appears to be a hussy” and that she is “the definition of a trainwreck fraud.”

Jones also mischaracterized other material in the yearbooks, falsely claiming they described “how much Chrissy loved passing out and how Chrissy couldn’t remember anything, and that was good because then she would have plausible deniability.”

Later in the broadcast, Jones returned to the yearbook smear to call a high school-aged Ford “captain of the sluts.” This smear has spread to fake news website True Pundit and far-right Twitter accounts connected to previous bogus attacks on Ford."

Note that Jones is an adult man creating and spreading lies and smears about a woman who was 15 years old at the time. He not only attacked Christine, he did the same with another innocent teenager whose only sin was being in the same school as Dr. Ford.

One thing that doesn't surprise me is how the usual suspects here jumped on these lies and accepted them as gospel, despite there being no evidence that anything in the article is true. Only a complete idiot would think that Alex Jones and his cohorts are credible reporters.

Prove my info is phony, Mr. Earl.
 
Whoa, nobody is saying that a slut deserves to be raped. A slut's status as a slut is still relevant though, when the slut is making allegations. If her slut behavior involved fantasy rape for example, a jury would need to know all about it and would need to compare it to any current case that involves rape.

You're calling a 15-year old teen girl a slut without any credible evidence, yet not a peep out of you over Kavanaugh and his friends who attempted to jump anyone who moved.
 
Back
Top