Should the Mueller Report be public?

[domer76]

Odd how on the one hand, lefties have Mullet on a pedestal: Boy Scout, straight shooter etc.

But now they want Mullet to draw outside the lines if he doesn’t provide a crime they can pin on Trump. They can’t have it both ways: if Mullet is a Boy Scout then don’t ask him to do things Boy Scouts don’t do.

Not that we needed further evidence of it, but once again, this shows that this was never about justice for The Resistance.

It’s about ‘stopping Trump’ and always has been. And they were out to ‘stop Trump’ by whatever means—even if it meant invoking the 25th Amendment—even if the 25th can only be invoked if the President is incapacitated and Trump was everything BUT incapacitated.

Anyone *sincerely* interested in justice would start their crime search right there. Thankfully, the odds are increasing that we’ll finally get it.

Such massive horseshit. You’re making excuses why the full report shouldn’t be released. You’re pulling your “draw outside the lines” crap right out of your rectum.

I’m asking this boy scout to release all his findings, which he will do. Now, we’ll see what Trump and his boys choose to hide.

Your 25th Amendment comment has ZERO to do with Mueller’s investigation. Just more diversionary bullshit on your part.

 

[anatta]

There’s a problem with that as it relates to the investigation.

For months—years now actually, we’ve been trying to tell the lefties collusion is not a crime. Unless, it rises to a criminal conspiracy. There is no law on the books that pertains to it.

Is it unethical? Absolutely. Or as Dershowitz so succinctly put it ‘collusion may be sin, but it’s not a crime’.

But here’s the deal: Barr isn’t required by DOJ guidelines to recite anything but *actual crimes* from Mullet’s report.

And while your wanting to shine a clear light on this thing is commendable—keep in mind the lefties are anything but. They will gladly turn a blind eye to all of THE COLLUSION that was going on with the Dossier, the DNC and the RUSSIANS before the 2016 election.

They literally don’t care if it makes them rank hypocrites for trying to nail Trump for the EXACT THING democrats and the Deep State are guilty of in spades. All they want to do is get Trump, and effectively nullify the election.

You can call them hypocrites all you want—but it rolls like water off a duck’s back.

Don’t play into their hands. Let the DOJ do its job, finally.

but it was more then just collusion the DoJ/FBI/CIA ( deep state) used the Steele dossier to start a bogus investigation and used it for fake FISA etc.as well. they are traitors to the Constitution

 

[domer76]

and the beat goes on.....the witch hunt continues

Squawk! Process Crime!
Squawk! Fake news!
Squawk! Enemy of the people!
Squawk! Uranium One!
Squawk! No collusion!
Squawk! Witch hunt!
Squawk! Cabal!

 

[Ross Dolan]

"While discussing claims by President Trump's former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, that the presidnet knew about a meeting between a Russian official and Donald Trump Jr., constitutional scholar and prominent defense attorney Alan Dershowitz said if the allegation is true, it is a "political problem" and not a "legal problem" because so-called "collusion" to get dirt on a political opponent is not a "federal crime."

"[T]he big picture is that even if everything he [Cohen] says is true, it's not a crime," said Dershowitz on the July 27 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360.

"Even if the president actively sought material dirt on Hillary Clinton, terrible thing, but even if he sought it, but the dirt had already been gathered, and he wasn't asking them to hack the DNC or do anything criminal, that would not be a crime," said Dershowitz, a professor emeritus at Harvard Law School. "

I expect that Mr. Dershowitz is a bit more learned than the Democrats on these forums.

Jesus H. Christ, Earl...NEITHER YOU NOR DERSHOWITZ KNOWS EVERYTHING Cohen has said so neither of you can possibly reach the conclusion that there are no crimes possibly shown in Cohen's testimony.

Give it up. Stop being stupid enough to defend this abomination in the White House.

 

[domer76]

There’s a problem with that as it relates to the investigation.

For months—years now actually, we’ve been trying to tell the lefties collusion is not a crime. Unless, it rises to a criminal conspiracy. There is no law on the books that pertains to it.

Is it unethical? Absolutely. Or as Dershowitz so succinctly put it ‘collusion may be sin, but it’s not a crime’.

But here’s the deal: Barr isn’t required by DOJ guidelines to recite anything but *actual crimes* from Mullet’s report.

And while your wanting to shine a clear light on this thing is commendable—keep in mind the lefties are anything but. They will gladly turn a blind eye to all of THE COLLUSION that was going on with the Dossier, the DNC and the RUSSIANS before the 2016 election.

They literally don’t care if it makes them rank hypocrites for trying to nail Trump for the EXACT THING democrats and the Deep State are guilty of in spades. All they want to do is get Trump, and effectively nullify the election.

You can call them hypocrites all you want—but it rolls like water off a duck’s back.

Don’t play into their hands. Let the DOJ do its job, finally.

“Isn’t required” There you go. That’s your go to excuse for hiding the uncomfortable truth.

“Isn’t required” How fucking lame is that?

 

[anatta]

That is one of the dumbest things you've ever written in JPP, Earl.

The Democrats...and Independents like me...ARE ASKING THAT THE ENTIRE REPORT BE RELEASED. Most of us realize that there are probably security reasons for withholding some few items...but we are lobbying for complete release (of anything but those things.)

The assholes of your side want a recent Trump appointee to choose what to release.

Yet you are one of the people suggesting those who want the entire thing released...are the people looking for selective things to be released.

That is beyond stupid.

Get the hell off it.

we want the proper authority to decide what to release,and you don't know AG Barr if you think he bows to political pressure

 

[Earl]

That is one of the dumbest things you've ever written in JPP, Earl.

The Democrats...and Independents like me...ARE ASKING THAT THE ENTIRE REPORT BE RELEASED. Most of us realize that there are probably security reasons for withholding some few items...but we are lobbying for complete release (of anything but those things.)

The assholes of your side want a recent Trump appointee to choose what to release.

Yet you are one of the people suggesting those who want the entire thing released...are the people looking for selective things to be released.

That is beyond stupid.

Get the hell off it.

What if the report is, for the most part, positive with some negativity? I believe that the Democrats will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

The Justice Department rules will determine what is released.

I could say that you have zero, zip, nada in the way of self-discipline. I could say that but I won't. I will compare my educational resume at any time.

 

[anatta]

What if the report is, for the most part, positive with some negativity? I believe that the Democrats will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

The Justice Department rules will determine what is released.

I could say that you have zero, zip, nada in the way of self-discipline. I could say that but I won't. I will compare my educational resume at any time.

it will be a PROSECUTORIAL statement - with no mitigation by a Defense like a true report

 

[Ross Dolan]

“Isn’t required” There you go. That’s your go to excuse for hiding the uncomfortable truth.

“Isn’t required” How fucking lame is that?

Right you are.

It "isn't required" for a president to be a decent, reasonable, educated person...but we certainly can hope we get better than the abomination we have now.

 

[Ross Dolan]

we want the proper authority to decide what to release,and you don't know AG Barr if you think he bows to political pressure

I think Barr will do the right thing...and I have said so many times in this forum.

But the discussion here has nothing to do with what I expect of Barr.

 

[Earl]

Jesus H. Christ, Earl...NEITHER YOU NOR DERSHOWITZ KNOWS EVERYTHING Cohen has said so neither of you can possibly reach the conclusion that there are no crimes possibly shown in Cohen's testimony.

Give it up. Stop being stupid enough to defend this abomination in the White House.

Read carefully, Frank:

"I expect that Mr. Dershowitz is a bit more learned than the Democrats on these forums"

I neither said or inferred that I know everything...nor does Mr. Dershowitz.

 

[Ross Dolan]

What if the report is, for the most part, positive with some negativity? I believe that the Democrats will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

I do not care what you "believe"...because I think you have got your head up your ass right now.

The people asking that the entire thing be released...want that.

Why you are saying they want part redacted is beyond comprehension.

The Justice Department rules will determine what is released.

I could say that you have zero, zip, nada in the way of self-discipline. I could say that but I won't. I will compare my educational resume at any time.

Fuck you.

No...FUCK YOU.

 

[Earl]

Jesus H. Christ, Earl...NEITHER YOU NOR DERSHOWITZ KNOWS EVERYTHING Cohen has said so neither of you can possibly reach the conclusion that there are no crimes possibly shown in Cohen's testimony.

Give it up. Stop being stupid enough to defend this abomination in the White House.

Read carefully, Frank:

"I expect that Mr. Dershowitz is a bit more learned than the Democrats on these forums"

I neither said or inferred that I know everything...nor does Mr. Dershowitz.

 

[Ross Dolan]

Read carefully, Frank:

"I expect that Mr. Dershowitz is a bit more learned than the Democrats on these forums"

I neither said or inferred that I know everything...nor does Mr. Dershowitz.

Don't you even read what you post, Earl?

Here is what you posted:

"[T]he big picture is that even if everything he [Cohen] says is true, it's not a crime," said Dershowitz on the July 27 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360.

If you (and Dershowitz) do not know EVERYTHING Cohen has said...how can that statement make any sense?

Wake up!

 

[Earl]

Beautiful riposte, do you have any more gems?

Work on that self-discipline.

 

[Ross Dolan]

Beautiful riposte, do you have any more gems?

Work on that self-discipline.

Fuck you!

Gotta go feed the sheep.

Be back in an hour to see how successful you were at that.

 

[jimmymccready]

I believe that the Republicans will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

 

[Earl]

I believe that the Republicans will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

As I posted, I believe it will all be leaked except the classified information. Perhaps even that will be leaked too by Hillary.

 

[domer76]

Right you are.

It "isn't required" for a president to be a decent, reasonable, educated person...but we certainly can hope we get better than the abomination we have now.

I suppose that’s how the Trump apologists approach life. They don’t do anything that “isn’t required”.

Just fucking lame.

 

[domer76]

What if the report is, for the most part, positive with some negativity? I believe that the Democrats will want the positive parts redacted and the negative parts released.

The Justice Department rules will determine what is released.

I could say that you have zero, zip, nada in the way of self-discipline. I could say that but I won't. I will compare my educational resume at any time.

Wrong again, Earl. I want to see every damn word.

Hey, you never did answer the four times I asked you this question. Here’s the fifth time.

What is McCabe charged with and who is charging and prosecuting him?