Should the Mueller Report be public?

[Ross Dolan]

What should be obvious to everyone by now is that supporters of Donald Trump want a sanitized version (by a recent Trump appointee) of the report out...

...and the rest of us want the entire report out.

And the assholes who continue support of Donald Trump...the people who want to hide some of the report...want to claim that our side is the one who wants to hide stuff.

Ya cannot make this shit up!

 

[Ross Dolan]

Really, Frankie lol?

What is Mullet then? A kind of Torquemada?

He is an investigator...not a prosecutor.

Specifically...not a prosecutor.

 

[Darth Omar]

What should be obvious to everyone by now is that supporters of Donald Trump want a sanitized version (by a recent Trump appointee) of the report out...

...and the rest of us want the entire report out.

And the assholes who continue support of Donald Trump...the people who want to hide some of the report...want to claim that our side is the one who wants to hide stuff.

Ya cannot make this shit up!

We couldn’t agree more on the last sentence, Frankie lol.

What are the DOJ guidelines on the release of Special Counsel reports?

 

[Darth Omar]

He is an investigator...not a prosecutor.

Specifically...not a prosecutor.

Always majoring in the minors, eh Frankie lol.

 

[Earl]

"What should be obvious to everyone by now is that supporters of Donald Trump want a sanitized version (by a recent Trump appointee) of the report out...'

Untrue, I am a supporter of President Trump and I want the entire report to be released...with classified methods and means redacted.

 

[Ross Dolan]

We couldn’t agree more on the last sentence, Frankie lol.

What are the DOJ guidelines on the release of Special Counsel reports?

It doesn't matter what they are.

The FACTS are that a segment of the population wants parts of the report hidden...and another segment wants the entire report released.

No matter what...for the segment who wants parts hidden to suggest that the segment that wants everything release...ARE TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING...

...makes no sense at all.

If anyone is trying to hide something (not saying anyone is)...but IF ANYONE IS TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING...

...it sure as hell is not the segment asking for total release.

 

[Ross Dolan]

"What should be obvious to everyone by now is that supporters of Donald Trump want a sanitized version (by a recent Trump appointee) of the report out...'

Untrue, I am a supporter of President Trump and I want the entire report to be released...with classified methods and means redacted.

If it is necessary to read my comment with the modifier "many of the supporters of Donald Trump"...please do it.

 

[Darth Omar]

"What should be obvious to everyone by now is that supporters of Donald Trump want a sanitized version (by a recent Trump appointee) of the report out...'

Untrue, I am a supporter of President Trump and I want the entire report to be released...with classified methods and means redacted.

Then the documents should be redacted to gibberish like they were whenever republicans were leading the House Committee lol.

 

[Earl]

If it is necessary to read my comment with the modifier "many of the supporters of Donald Trump"...please do it.

Better, Frank.

I want the truth. The truth will stand until the end of time.

Whether collusion is or is not a crime, anyone who colludes with a foreign power to influence our elections should be drawn and quartered.

 

[Darth Omar]

It doesn't matter what they are.

The FACTS are that a segment of the population wants parts of the report hidden...and another segment wants the entire report released.

No matter what...for the segment who wants parts hidden to suggest that the segment that wants everything release...ARE TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING...

...makes no sense at all.

If anyone is trying to hide something (not saying anyone is)...but IF ANYONE IS TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING...

...it sure as hell is not the segment asking for total release.

What is it with you lefties and breaking rules, Frankie lol?

The DOJ guidelines should be followed on the release of Mullet’s report. The Resistance doesn’t get to pick and choose on when the Electoral College should be adhered to, when the 25th Amendment is applicable, when it’s lawful to get FISA warrants on innocent tax payers—you get the idea.

Enough is enough.

 

[Darth Omar]

Better, Frank.

I want the truth. The truth will stand until the end of time.

Whether collusion is or is not a crime, anyone who colludes with a foreign power to influence our elections should be drawn and quartered.

Then you’re asking for a bloody mess and the lefties REALLY don’t want to go there lol!

 

[Ross Dolan]

What is it with you lefties and breaking rules, Frankie lol?

The DOJ guidelines should be followed on the release of Mullet’s report. The Resistance doesn’t get to pick and choose on when the Electoral College should be adhered to, when the 25th Amendment is applicable, when it’s lawful to get FISA warrants on innocent tax payers—you get the idea.

Enough is enough.

Wake the fuck up you fucking moron.

My point was:

"The report" is a report about the special counsel's investigation into possible coordination or collusion of the Trump campaign with Russia to impact on the election of 2016.

One segment of our population is arguing that the entire report should be released.

One segment is arguing that the report should be "sanitized" by a recent Trump appointee.

And the segment that is arguing that the report should be sanitized is saying that the segment that is arguing that the entire report should be released...is trying to hide something.

Do you get it? Do you get the absurdity of that argument?

Are you capable of getting it?

Is your brain functioning?

 

[Darth Omar]

Wake the fuck up you fucking moron.

My point was:

"The report" is a report about the special counsel's investigation into possible coordination or collusion of the Trump campaign with Russia to impact on the election of 2016.

One segment of our population is arguing that the entire report should be released.

One segment is arguing that the report should be "sanitized" by a recent Trump appointee.

And the segment that is arguing that the report should be sanitized is saying that the segment that is arguing that the entire report should be released...is trying to hide something.

Do you get it? Do you get the absurdity of that argument?

Are you capable of getting it?

Is your brain functioning?

What part of ‘DOJ guidelines’ are you struggling with, Frankie lol?

Just admit you don’t care what rules or laws are broken so long as they ‘stop Trump’.

 

[Ross Dolan]

What part of ‘DOJ guidelines’ are you struggling with, Frankie lol?

Just admit you don’t care what rules or laws are broken so long as they ‘stop Trump’.

You really are too fucking stupid to be in these kinds of discussions, Darth.

Whatever the rules are...my comment is not impacted by them.

The side in favor of NOT RELEASING EVERYTHING...no matter whether because of rules or not...SHOULD NOT BE ACCUSING THE OTHER SIDE OF WANTING TO HIDE SOMETHING...by asking that everything be released.

If the rules were, "NOT ONE WORD CAN BE RELEASED"...that would not impact on what I wrote.

Try to shake off the stupid.

I engage you in hopes that you are just faking the stupidity.

Hope springs eternal.

 

[Earl]

I do believe that some posters on this thread should read Pliny the Elder, author of the celebrated "Natural History". Or, perhaps, Thoreau's "Walden Pond." Calm the savage beast.

 

[Darth Omar]

Better, Frank.

I want the truth. The truth will stand until the end of time.

Whether collusion is or is not a crime, anyone who colludes with a foreign power to influence our elections should be drawn and quartered.

There’s a problem with that as it relates to the investigation.

For months—years now actually, we’ve been trying to tell the lefties collusion is not a crime. Unless, it rises to a criminal conspiracy. There is no law on the books that pertains to it.

Is it unethical? Absolutely. Or as Dershowitz so succinctly put it ‘collusion may be sin, but it’s not a crime’.

But here’s the deal: Barr isn’t required by DOJ guidelines to recite anything but *actual crimes* from Mullet’s report.

And while your wanting to shine a clear light on this thing is commendable—keep in mind the lefties are anything but. They will gladly turn a blind eye to all of THE COLLUSION that was going on with the Dossier, the DNC and the RUSSIANS before the 2016 election.

They literally don’t care if it makes them rank hypocrites for trying to nail Trump for the EXACT THING democrats and the Deep State are guilty of in spades. All they want to do is get Trump, and effectively nullify the election.

You can call them hypocrites all you want—but it rolls like water off a duck’s back.

Don’t play into their hands. Let the DOJ do its job, finally.

 

[Earl]

There’s a problem with that as it relates to the investigation.

For months—years now actually, we’ve been trying to tell the lefties collusion is not a crime. Unless, it rises to a criminal conspiracy. There is no law on the books that pertains to it.

Is it unethical? Absolutely. Or as Dershowitz so succinctly put it ‘collusion may be sin, but it’s not a crime’.

But here’s the deal: Barr isn’t required by DOJ guidelines to recite anything but *actual crimes* from Mullet’s report.

And while your wanting to shine a clear light on this thing is commendable—keep in mind the lefties are anything but. They will gladly turn a blind eye to all of THE COLLUSION that was going on with the Dossier, the DNC and the RUSSIANS before the 2016 election.

They literally don’t care if it makes them rank hypocrites for trying to nail Trump for the EXACT THING democrats and the Deep State are guilty of in spades. All they want to do is get Trump, and effectively nullify the election.

You can call them hypocrites all you want—but it rolls like water off a duck’s back.

Don’t play into their hands. Let the DOJ do its job, finally.

I agree that it isn't a crime. I also believe that we should separate ourselves from Democrats.

If they have their way, they would only want parts that were negative of President Trump released.

It's probably a moot issue. The report will be leaked in its entirety, in my opinion.

The "drawn and quartered' was in jest...well...

 

[Jarod]

There’s a problem with that as it relates to the investigation.

For months—years now actually, we’ve been trying to tell the lefties collusion is not a crime. Unless, it rises to a criminal conspiracy. There is no law on the books that pertains to it.

Is it unethical? Absolutely. Or as Dershowitz so succinctly put it ‘collusion may be sin, but it’s not a crime’.

But here’s the deal: Barr isn’t required by DOJ guidelines to recite anything but *actual crimes* from Mullet’s report.

And while your wanting to shine a clear light on this thing is commendable—keep in mind the lefties are anything but. They will gladly turn a blind eye to all of THE COLLUSION that was going on with the Dossier, the DNC and the RUSSIANS before the 2016 election.

They literally don’t care if it makes them rank hypocrites for trying to nail Trump for the EXACT THING democrats and the Deep State are guilty of in spades. All they want to do is get Trump, and effectively nullify the election.

You can call them hypocrites all you want—but it rolls like water off a duck’s back.

Don’t play into their hands. Let the DOJ do its job, finally.

You have failed to realize or admit that collusion is a part of many crimes. All Conspiracies have collusion as a part.

Do you not believe that the American people should be told if unethical things are found to have happened?

 

[Earl]

"While discussing claims by President Trump's former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, that the presidnet knew about a meeting between a Russian official and Donald Trump Jr., constitutional scholar and prominent defense attorney Alan Dershowitz said if the allegation is true, it is a "political problem" and not a "legal problem" because so-called "collusion" to get dirt on a political opponent is not a "federal crime."

"[T]he big picture is that even if everything he [Cohen] says is true, it's not a crime," said Dershowitz on the July 27 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360.

"Even if the president actively sought material dirt on Hillary Clinton, terrible thing, but even if he sought it, but the dirt had already been gathered, and he wasn't asking them to hack the DNC or do anything criminal, that would not be a crime," said Dershowitz, a professor emeritus at Harvard Law School. "

I expect that Mr. Dershowitz is a bit more learned than the Democrats on these forums.

 

[Ross Dolan]

I agree that it isn't a crime. I also believe that we should separate ourselves from Democrats.

If they have their way, they would only want parts that were negative of President Trump released.

It's probably a moot issue. The report will be leaked in its entirety, in my opinion.

The "drawn and quartered' was in jest...well...

That is one of the dumbest things you've ever written in JPP, Earl.

The Democrats...and Independents like me...ARE ASKING THAT THE ENTIRE REPORT BE RELEASED. Most of us realize that there are probably security reasons for withholding some few items...but we are lobbying for complete release (of anything but those things.)

The assholes of your side want a recent Trump appointee to choose what to release.

Yet you are one of the people suggesting those who want the entire thing released...are the people looking for selective things to be released.

That is beyond stupid.

Get the hell off it.