Should the Mueller Report be public?

She makes some very good points:

Recall that Democrats – who now call for the Mueller report to be made public – protested loudly when then-FBI Director James Comey publicly discussed what the FBI found during its investigation of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s emails. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein used Comey’s improper disclosure as a basis for his firing, criticizing Comey for revealing such information.

Also recall now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s Senate confirmation hearing last fall. Many decried the fact that uncorroborated accusations about Kavanaugh were made public. The Senate Judiciary Committee even referred some of those accusers to the Justice Department for possible prosecution for providing false information to Congress.

A public report, which would expose uncorroborated accusations, smears innocent people – and perhaps even wrongly validates those accusations – as happened at the Kavanaugh hearing.

The Comey/Clinton debacle is exactly why there will be nothing said of non-crimes in the Mullet report.

Comey was way out of line when he exonerated Hillary—and he should have been fired on the spot for it, by Obama. It wasn’t Comey’s role to charge/exonerate Hillary: that should have been left to a grand jury since AG Lynch kinda/sorta recused.

Likewise, AG Barr would be out of line for reporting on Mullet-findings that don’t rise to the level of crimes or criminal activity. Mullet was appointed as a prosecutor—not as a source for providing grist for a conspiracy theory mill.
 
Just heard something interesting on Fox: 1) It probably won’t be out next week 2) when it comes out, it goes ONLY to the AG 3) anyone NOT charged will not be mentioned. It’s beginning to sound like you’re gonna get a list of names that you already know, the charges against them, and maybe the evidence. I just don’t think the president’s name is going to be on the list


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just as some of us thought. Trump’s boy selectively removing information. That will be no surprise at all.
 
The Comey/Clinton debacle is exactly why there will be nothing said of non-crimes in the Mullet report.

Comey was way out of line when he exonerated Hillary—and he should have been fired on the spot for it, by Obama. It wasn’t Comey’s role to charge/exonerate Hillary: that should have been left to a grand jury since AG Lynch kinda/sorta recused.

Likewise, AG Barr would be out of line for reporting on Mullet-findings that don’t rise to the level of crimes or criminal activity. Mullet was appointed as a prosecutor—not as a source for providing grist for a conspiracy theory mill.

Why shouldn’t unethical activity, even if it hasn’t been prosecuted by Mueller, be excluded?

Just as I predicted. The right starting to make excuses for information being withheld.
 
Last edited:
Oh don’t worry, your boy Schiff will do everything in his power to keep it going.

Not sure what voters will think of it.

lol

Schiff is the least of Trump’s troubles. The Southern District of New York and other entities will be looking up Orangetweet’s skirts for years.
 
Why shouldn’t unethical activity, even if it hasn’t been prosecuted by Mueller, be excluded?

Justvas I predicted. The right starting to make excuses for information being withheld.

How about we appoint a prosecutor to uncover unethical activities by all politicians in DC.

Oh wait, that’s too big a job for one man. That’s not in Mullet’s job description.
 
Just as some of us thought. Trump’s boy selectively removing information. That will be no surprise at all.

Don't like it? Talk to Bill Clinton. He's the guy who caused the democrats to change the rules. SP reports used to go to congress until Monica and the blue dress. Please examine your motives here, do you want justice? Or do you just want to give lefty candidates dirt to run on?
 
Don't like it? Talk to Bill Clinton. He's the guy who caused the democrats to change the rules. SP reports used to go to congress until Monica and the blue dress. Please examine your motives here, do you want justice? Or do you just want to give lefty candidates dirt to run on?

I want to see the entire report. What’s your excuse for wanting parts buried? Oh, that’s right, you’re a Trumpanzee.

Who says the report will only give Dems dirt to run on? Don’t you want people to be exonerated if the report says so? Or do you just want selective parts because the Trump orbit is dirty as hell?

Thanks for validating my original claim. That Trump supporters will be making excuses why the entire report is not fully released. You’re at least the third on this forum.
 
Don't like it? Talk to Bill Clinton. He's the guy who caused the democrats to change the rules. SP reports used to go to congress until Monica and the blue dress. Please examine your motives here, do you want justice? Or do you just want to give lefty candidates dirt to run on?

Odd how on the one hand, lefties have Mullet on a pedestal: Boy Scout, straight shooter etc.

But now they want Mullet to draw outside the lines if he doesn’t provide a crime they can pin on Trump. They can’t have it both ways: if Mullet is a Boy Scout then don’t ask him to do things Boy Scouts don’t do.

Not that we needed further evidence of it, but once again, this shows that this was never about justice for The Resistance.

It’s about ‘stopping Trump’ and always has been. And they were out to ‘stop Trump’ by whatever means—even if it meant invoking the 25th Amendment—even if the 25th can only be invoked if the President is incapacitated and Trump was everything BUT incapacitated.

Anyone *sincerely* interested in justice would start their crime search right there. Thankfully, the odds are increasing that we’ll finally get it.
 
Last edited:
.

Looks like more fake news from Clinton News Network.

A senior U.S. Justice Department official on Friday shot down expectations that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office will deliver a highly anticipated report next week on its investigation into possible Russian interference in U.S. elections.

'Any reports that the Special Counsel's report will be delivered to the DOJ during the week of February 28 are incorrect,' the official said.

CNN reported on Wednesday that the Justice Department may announce as early as next week that Mueller had given Attorney General William Barr his report. Barr would review the findings and submit his own summary to Congress, CNN reported.

'It's not surprising that they would not issue a report while the president is in Vietnam engaged in high-stakes international diplomacy,' said a person close to the administration, referring to President Donald Trump's meeting with North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...OT-expected-week-says-Department-Justice.html
 
Last edited:
and the beat goes on.....the witch hunt continues

They can’t help themselves, obviously lol, but Schiff and The Resistance are in the process of making the identical mistake the right made back in the 90’s when they went after Bill Clinton.

The Eternal Crime Search won’t play well outside of the lefty bubble, politically.
 
They can’t help themselves, obviously lol, but Schiff and The Resistance are in the process of making the identical mistake the right made back in the 90’s when they went after Bill Clinton.

The Eternal Crime Search won’t play well outside of the lefty bubble, politically.
I thnk i posted a thread but this is really good..

Schiffting to Phase 2 of Collusion

https://outline.com/ChRYxB
 
I thnk i posted a thread but this is really good..

Schiffting to Phase 2 of Collusion

https://outline.com/ChRYxB

Mr. Schiff turned this week to a dependable scribe—the Washington Post’s David Ignatius—to lay out the next chapter of the penny dreadful. Mr. Ignatius was the original conduit for the leak about former national security adviser Mike Flynn’s conversations with a Russian ambassador, and the far-fetched claims that Mr. Flynn had violated the Logan Act of 1799. Mr. Schiff has now dictated to Mr. Ignatius a whole new collusion theory. Forget Carter Page, Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos—whoever. The real Trump-Russia canoodling rests in “Trump’s finances.” The future president was “doing business with Russia” and “seeking Kremlin help.” [from link in prior post]
__________

‘The next chapter in the penny dreadful’ lol.

Victor Davis Hanson had a good piece on the attempted coup this past week. And Hanson is taken seriously in ways a Hannity isn’t. He’s a conservative thinker [a respected classicist and historian] but not a die-hard partisan that won’t call out Trump when it’s called for.

https://amgreatness.com/2019/02/17/autopsy-of-a-dead-coup/
 
he authors, accomplices, and dupes of this attempted overthrow of constitutional government are now well along in reciting their misconduct without embarrassment or remorse because—in fired FBI Director James Comey’s formulation—a “higher duty” than the oath they swore to uphold the Constitution compelled them. Or—in fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s words—“the threat” was too great. Nevermind that the nature of “the threat” was that the people might elect someone he and Comey disapproved of as president, and that that person might actually serve his term, as elected.

A Long List of Offenders—and Offenses
The extent of the criminal misconduct of the former law enforcement and intelligence chiefs is now notorious, but to make the right point here, it has to be summarized. The fact that the officially preferred candidate lied to federal officials about her emails and acted in outright contempt of Congress and the legal process in the destruction of evidence, was simply ignored by the FBI director, who announced that she would not be prosecuted, though he had no authority to make that determination.

The dossier of salacious gossip and defamatory falsehoods amassed by a retired British spy from the lowest grade of intelligence sources in Russia, commissioned and paid for by the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, was circulated to the media by high public officials and cited in illegal and dishonest applications to authorize surveillance of the campaign of the other presidential candidate. A special counsel was empowered on the false pretext of the necessity to get to the bottom of Trump-Russian collusion in the election, of which there was and remains no evidence, because it did not occur and was a complete partisan fabrication.

The special counsel then packed his staff with militant Clinton partisans, and acted very late and only when his hand was forced by the media to remove two officials who referred in texts to each other to the Bureau’s ability to smear and provoke the impeachment of the winning candidate as “an insurance policy” against his filling the office to which he was elected.

Large sections of the media colluded with the Democratic campaign and produced the doctrine that anything was justifiable, no matter how dishonest, to destroy the incoming president’s reputation and damage him in public opinion polls to legitimize attempts to remove him from office. Large sections of the media deliberately deluged the public with stories they knew to be false about the new president and referred to him in terms of unprecedented vituperation in what purported to be reportage and not comment.

This unorganized but widespread campaign of defamation was taken up by a great number of ordinarily newsworthy celebrities and was accompanied by false, unresearched stories denigrating President Trump’s supporters, such as the false claims about Catholic school students’ treatment of an elderly native American and the false claim that actor Jussie Smollett had been beaten up and reviled by Trump supporters. The former intelligence chiefs of the nation under President Obama repeatedly have accused this president of treason, the most heinous of all crimes, and have asserted with the authority of their former positions that the Russians determined the result of the 2016 presidential election. They knew this to be entirely false.

Distracting Public Attention
The special counsel has failed to find any evidence of the collusion and electoral interference that was the justification for establishing his inquiry, and the Democrats are already expressing disappointment in his failure to produce such evidence when the leading Democratic members of congressional investigative committees still robotically claim to have at least prima facie evidence of such collusion.

The dishonest attempt of much of the opposition and what even left-leaning media-monitoring organizations record as 90 percent of the national media, continued for more than two years to try to condition the country to believe that the president had committed the “high crimes and misdemeanors” required by the Constitution for impeachment and removal from office.

The special counsel, apart from smearing the president, distracted public attention from or tended to justify the ever more evident misconduct of the president’s enemies. And we now know that Comey, despite his “higher duty,” lied to the president about his not being a target of an FBI investigation, illegally leaked to the New York Times the contents of a self-serving memo he purloined from the government, and lied to Congress by claiming 245 times in one sitting to be ignorant of recent matters that no one of sound mind could have forgotten.

And now we have Andrew McCabe’s proud confirmation that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein not only continued the illegal counterintelligence investigation of President Trump, but actively discussed methods of securing his removal from office by deliberate misuse of a variety of laws, including the Emoluments Clause, the 25th Amendment to deal with mental incompetence, and the Logan Act of 1799, which has never been used successfully and has not been tested in 150 years.

Make Those Responsible Pay at the Polls
This entire monstrous travesty is finally coming apart without even waiting for the horrible disappointment of the special counsel’s inability to adduce a scrap of evidence to justify his replication of Torquemada as an inquisitor and of the Gestapo and KGB at rounding up and accusing unarmed individuals who were not flight risks. The collapse of this grotesque putsch, under the irresistible pressure of a functioning attorney general and Senate committees that are not hamstrung by NeverTrumpers, will cause a revulsion against the Democratic Party that will be seismic and prolong
 
Mr. Schiff turned this week to a dependable scribe—the Washington Post’s David Ignatius—to lay out the next chapter of the penny dreadful. Mr. Ignatius was the original conduit for the leak about former national security adviser Mike Flynn’s conversations with a Russian ambassador, and the far-fetched claims that Mr. Flynn had violated the Logan Act of 1799. Mr. Schiff has now dictated to Mr. Ignatius a whole new collusion theory. Forget Carter Page, Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos—whoever. The real Trump-Russia canoodling rests in “Trump’s finances.” The future president was “doing business with Russia” and “seeking Kremlin help.” [from link in prior post]
__________

‘The next chapter in the penny dreadful’ lol.

Victor Davis Hanson had a good piece on the attempted coup this past week. And Hanson is taken seriously in ways a Hannity isn’t. He’s a conservative thinker [a respected classicist and historian] but not a die-hard partisan that won’t call out Trump when it’s called for.

https://amgreatness.com/2019/02/17/autopsy-of-a-dead-coup/
it is excellent. I posted it in APP

Autopsy of a Dead Coup
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?113286-Autopsy-of-a-Dead-Coup
 
The Comey/Clinton debacle is exactly why there will be nothing said of non-crimes in the Mullet report.

Comey was way out of line when he exonerated Hillary—and he should have been fired on the spot for it, by Obama. It wasn’t Comey’s role to charge/exonerate Hillary: that should have been left to a grand jury since AG Lynch kinda/sorta recused.

Likewise, AG Barr would be out of line for reporting on Mullet-findings that don’t rise to the level of crimes or criminal activity. Mullet was appointed as a prosecutor—not as a source for providing grist for a conspiracy theory mill.

Mueller WAS NOT appointed as a prosecutor.
 
Back
Top