Why withhold names of those not charged? There are no doubt some serious ethical violations by several who have not yet been indicted. Those should not be made public?
Should the Mueller Report be public?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Why withhold names of those not charged? There are no doubt some serious ethical violations by several who have not yet been indicted. Those should not be made public?
Getin the ring
Verified User
You snowflakes are a rare level of knucklehead, I'll give you that.
How about if they mail you all a personal copy?
How about if they mail you all a personal copy?
DOJ policy is NOT to divulge names of people who have not been charged.
It makes sense.
In any case...I think every word of the report will eventually (rather soon) be made public...including the names of people not charged.
Getin the ring
Verified User
oh great the Perry Masons are out in full dress
so tell us counsel, should the record reflect the corrupt parties that started the witch hunt to begin with? the lying to the FISA courts, the conspiracy at the DOJ to oust a sitting President?
OR
Just the stuff you want to see on the record
so tell us counsel, should the record reflect the corrupt parties that started the witch hunt to begin with? the lying to the FISA courts, the conspiracy at the DOJ to oust a sitting President?
OR
Just the stuff you want to see on the record
You do seem to be in a state, friend. Bad day at the office?
You snowflakes are a rare level of knucklehead, I'll give you that.
How about if they mail you all a personal copy?
Getin!
Still allowing the liberals here to have so much power over you.
Stop letting them trigger you so easily.
C'mon. You can do it.
Oops.
I guess once triggered...no backing away.
Okay. Maybe tomorrow will be better for you.
I hope so.
Getin the ring
Verified User
discussing the topic, friend.
you never have anything to offer, so trolling me is fine. I'll ignore you
Do that thing. I managed very well without you for a very long time, but my list of fascists on 'ignore' was getting too long!
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Is that the same money you used to bet Trump wouldn’t declare a National Emergency
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
Absolutely. Because you know if only parts of it come out, one side or the other is going to scream about "cover up." Well, we *know* one side will scream no matter what it says.
They seem to be doing it now...
...even as they argue that the report will totally exonerate this idiot.
Can't understand why they are not the ones demanding that every word be released.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
I already know what it is going to say.
Cite?
You wont even say it should be public.
Getin the ring
Verified User
It will be made public if the AG and the president thinks it is ok to be made public.
At what point in time did liberals forget the pecking order on such matters.
Trump is the commander-in-chief, In this matter the AG is second in line....PERIOD, if he, they think there is nothing in there that will harm national security, or interfere with Trumps duties as commander-in-chief, then he they may release it.
That nut-bags want some sort of entertainment value from matters of national security matters very little.
At what point in time did liberals forget the pecking order on such matters.
Trump is the commander-in-chief, In this matter the AG is second in line....PERIOD, if he, they think there is nothing in there that will harm national security, or interfere with Trumps duties as commander-in-chief, then he they may release it.
That nut-bags want some sort of entertainment value from matters of national security matters very little.
Calm down, Getin. Everything will be okay.
I think the AG is actually first in the pecking order...not Trump.
At least that is what Trump, and most of the experts I've heard, say.