"Trump claims picture ID is required to buy groceries"

Jade Dragon said:
I'm putting CO on ignore, and backing off. This has become a pitiful drama over something CO has little knowledge on.
Click to expand...

Ditto for me as well.
~~~
Today, 02:06 PM
Controlled Opposition
Note my apathy

This message is hidden because Controlled Opposition is on your ignore list.
Today, 02:07 PM
Controlled Opposition
Note my apathy

This message is hidden because Controlled Opposition is on your ignore list.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Bye, you idiotic brain dead piece of shit. Back on ignore you go.
Click to expand...

Since he has so little understanding of how friends interact in these situations, I fear he might not have enough friends. Used me? I was the one that jumped in by choice, without anyone telling me squat. That being said was quite insulting to my integrity.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Ditto for me as well.
~~~
Today, 02:06 PM
Controlled Opposition
Note my apathy

This message is hidden because Controlled Opposition is on your ignore list.
Today, 02:07 PM
Controlled Opposition
Note my apathy

This message is hidden because Controlled Opposition is on your ignore list.
Click to expand...

I don't understand why he started in like this. He was doing so well here, and seemed nice. :dunno:
 
Controlled Opposition said:
There is no such thing as an authorized posting of a PM. The rest of your post reflects your personality disorder.

2. PMs are Private Messages, they will remain Private... This will be strictly adhered to by all involved on this board. We cannot access anybody's PMs and we don't plan on acquiring the ability to do so. The only reason we would access another's PMs would be if we were required to by law, or if they are reported by the recipient using the reporting function which will place the PM in an area readable by the Admin Team. Reputation comments are not PMs and should be treated as any publicly accessible information.
Click to expand...
I’m sorry, but post #300, you did authorize that she could post the PM, if both parties agree a private message can be posted then it is not a rules violation. I am waiting on the other mods for a determination, but I advise in the future if you don’t want a private message to be posted, then don’t give permission for it to be posted.
 
Phantasmal said:
I’ve never made a late payment in my life. I make sure I have the money to pay off the card each month. If you are a wise money manager using a credit card has rewards. We take advantage of those rewards.
Click to expand...

I do the same and use the card to get rewards. It's a win-win.
 
Phantasmal said:
I’m sorry, but post #300, you did authorize that she could post the PM, if both parties agree a private message can be posted then it is not a rules violation. I am waiting on the other mods for a determination, but I advise in the future if you don’t want a private message to be posted, then don’t give permission for it to be posted.
Click to expand...

Do you mean that I can authorize someone to violate the rules? Is this the official ruling?
 
Controlled Opposition said:
Do you mean that I can authorize someone to violate the rules? Is this the official ruling?
Click to expand...
If both parties agree that a private message can be posted then it has allowed in the past. The rule was written to protect the privacy of others, if one party did not want the information to be released and also clarify that the moderators do not have access their private messages unless they are forwarded to us, but if permission is given to post private correspondence then it releases both parties from the contract of privacy, and is therefore not a rules violation. A ruling by all mods has yet to be determined, but in the past if both parties are in agreement that the private message can be posted, then it hasn’t been a rules violation.
 
Phantasmal said:
If both parties agree that a private message can be posted then it has allowed in the past. The rule was written to protect the privacy of others, if one party did not want the information to be released and also clarify that the moderators do not have access their private messages unless they are forwarded to us, but if permission is given to post private correspondence then it releases both parties from the contract of privacy, and is therefore not a rules violation. A ruling by all mods has yet to be determined, but in the past if both parties are in agreement that the private message can be posted, then it hasn’t been a rules violation.
Click to expand...

Thanks. You told me that it wasn't a rule violation, but I don't understand how I can authorize someone to break the rules. I hope the other mods will agree with my stance. And thanks for telling me that your was not the final answer because that is the way you presented it.
 
Controlled Opposition said:
Thanks. You told me that it wasn't a rule violation, but I don't understand how I can authorize someone to break the rules. I hope the other mods will agree with my stance. And thanks for telling me that your was not the final answer because that is the way you presented it.
Click to expand...
I have not presented it that way, I have always stated that the other mods have not, yet weighed in and it is yet to be determined. I am just going by past experiences on this forum.
 
Controlled Opposition said:
Do you mean that I can authorize someone to violate the rules? Is this the official ruling?
Click to expand...
I didn't see you authorize her to post what she ended up providing ...you said she lied about you sending her a "bygones will be bygones" post....you didn't tell her to feel free to post any private messages that had anything to do with you.
We didn't see the PM that you told her to go ahead and provide....Just one she "randomly chose...and I wonder why?;)
This is post #300....
"Yep, he's still obsessed with me. Weird how when he first showed up here he sent me a PM wanting bygones to be bygones. I was cool with it. Then he reverted to AmazonDick. Surprise!

^^
The above is a total lie. Safe though. I would authorize her to post it."
That's the only one you "authorized"...and that's not what she posted...And I guess you only authorized it because you knew it didn't exist. Which it doesn't.....
 
Last edited:
Controlled Opposition said:
Thanks. Does Owl Woman's violation mean that I can post her PMs?
Click to expand...

Are you really this obtuse? She must give you permission. If she gives you permission then it isn’t a rules violation. If she doesn’t agree, and you post the private message, then you have violated the rules. When both parties are in agreement there is no violation. Do you understand now?
 
christiefan915 said:
I do the same and use the card to get rewards. It's a win-win.
Click to expand...

We came back from vacation, and restocked the house with food. Mom had $80 off in rewards at Meijers, when we checked out. On my Amazon rewards card, I had about $32 in Amazon cash. Some say there are better routes then just redeeming the points, but I find it sufficient. I'm not greedy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top