The sexual perversion of racist cops in Alabama

SmarterthanYou said:
this is part of they idiocy and hypocrisy apparent in the sheeple. things that you allow cops to do, or want cops to do, would get an average civilian arrested, or worse. what do you think would happen if YOU warned someone running away from you after robbing or assaulting you?
Click to expand...

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________

Unless you're just a coward.

Your reply will show what you've decided.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
its called accountability and that so called 'holding to a higher standard'. you know, those things that don't happen today.
Click to expand...

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________

Unless you're just a coward.

Your reply will show what you've decided.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so it IS your fear of everything that requires you to support government enforcement agents. got it.
Click to expand...

Is it your fear of appearing to be uninformed and that's why you can't / won't answer the questions?
Looks like it, HUH!! :good4u:

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________

Unless you're just a coward.

Your reply will show what you've decided.
 
blackascoal said:
Calling the police on black people isn’t a Starbucks problem. It’s an America problem.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/

Notice what's common in every attack.

The political reckoning is coming ..
Click to expand...

Is it also an American problem that this women felt it was her right to go into a business, while being drunk, cause a disturbance, make threats involving a firearm, and then resist being arrested.

Looks like you just feel that she can just do what she wants and everyone else is just supposed to go along, to get along.

You're a dumbass.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
why would you need protection from me? you think the cops are the purveyors of law and order? I wonder if Sal Culosi thought the same. why don't you look him up and get back with me on your law and order or why you need the cops to protect you from me.
Click to expand...

Is this the reason you won't / can't answer the questions; because you need to be protected from your own ignorance??

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________

Unless you're just a coward.

Your reply will show what you've decided.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you idiots need to make up your mind. if cops are human and allowed to make mistakes like the above without fear of repercussions, then you should make the same fucking allowances for non cops to make the same fucking mistakes without wanting to have them executed. otherwise, you need to consider that cops are government, ONLY government, and as such are not allowed mistakes.
Click to expand...

Are you an idiot, for being unable to answer the questions asked?
Seeing as how you appear to unwilling to have your own mistakes shown.

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________

Unless you're just a coward.

Your reply will show what you've decided.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Who blames the victim in every single case? Why, it's Toxic!

Somehow I just knew you couldn't resist a thread where a black woman gets roughed up, and where you could twist it into her fault. So predictable.
Click to expand...

There is no twisting, you near sided bitch.

She went into a business drunk, was told to leave, came back and threatened violence, then resisted being arrested and you want to say that this ISN'T her fault.

Maybe you have the intelligence to answer the following:

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________
 
SmarterthanYou said:
are you that incapable of understanding the concepts layed out before you? or are you simply trapped within the framework of brainwashing that the government has been doing to us for decades?

seriously, is it that alien to you?
Click to expand...

Evidently you're incapable of answering the questions posed to you.

Is it because you've been brainwashed into lying?

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________

Unless you're just a coward.

Your reply will show what you've decided.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the idea that we're a police state is not comprehensible to them simply because they are used to it and accept it as freedom.
Click to expand...

Why don't you use your freedom and answer the questions?

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________

Unless you're just a coward.

Your reply will show what you've decided.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I expected this also. most people won't accept what is a police state unless they have the SS invading peoples homes at night and citizens mysteriously disappear. that's pretty damned dumb, but then you're the frog in a slow boiling pot of water and will refuse to see reality until it hits you.........or you secretly want that police state to use against your political enemies. either way, it makes you the enemy.
Click to expand...

And just think, here you have an opportunity to show what you think needs to change.

Please be specific and not just use some generalization.

Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Is this the reason you won't / can't answer the questions; because you need to be protected from your own ignorance??
Click to expand...


So anyway, about this Sal Culosi:

A Killing Without Cause

Thursday, November 30, 2006

FAIRFAX COUNTY police officer Deval V. Bullock is a good cop who made one disastrous mistake: Bumped by his own car door, he accidentally fired his weapon and killed an unarmed, nonviolent, non-threatening suspect during a routine arrest in January. The shooting of Salvatore J. Culosi, an optometrist under investigation for being a sports bookmaker, was unintentional. But it was also negligent; under the circumstances, Mr. Bullock should not have had his finger on the trigger, nor even aimed his weapon at Mr. Culosi. Now the Fairfax police department is recommending a slap on the wrist for Mr. Bullock -- three weeks without pay and his removal from the police SWAT team. The punishment is lenient, to say the least, but even so it is too much for the police union.

For months before this egregious shooting, an undercover police detective had been placing bets with Mr. Culosi, who had no criminal record; had never owned a firearm; and presented no threat of violence, flight or resisting arrest. It is still unclear, 10 months after the fact, why despite that profile police decided to arrest Mr. Culosi with a SWAT team, which is trained and equipped for use in dangerous situations. After Mr. Culosi's death, the police department said it would conduct a review of policies and procedures involving the use of such teams. But if there was such a review, its results have not been made public. One wonders if the SWAT team in Fairfax, lacking frequent opportunities to respond to situations involving imminent danger and threats, is deployed simply to give its officers something to do. If so, that's bad policy and bad policing.

Mr. Bullock, a 17-year veteran of the police force, was trained in firearms and tactics. He well knew that during a routine arrest, his finger should not have been on the trigger and his gun should not have been pointed at the suspect. So it is no real excuse that, in jumping from his car, the car door bounced back, striking him in the side and causing him to pull the trigger. Like people in other lines of work who make disastrous mistakes, Mr. Bullock should be held accountable for his actions, even though they were unintentional. The chief prosecutor in Fairfax, Robert F. Horan Jr., already declined to prosecute Mr. Bullock or refer the case to a grand jury, yet now police union officials howl that even a three-week suspension is unfair. It's not. It is in fact little more than symbolic discipline. But in such a case symbolism is important and well placed.


© 2006 The Washington Post Company

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/29/AR2006112901416.html
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Here's your chance to educate me and explain what should have happened, when:
Question 1 - The management asked her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 1 - _____________________________________________

Question 2 - The Officers told her to leave and she didn't?
Answer 2 - ________________________________________

Question 3 - The Officers told her to put her hands behind her back and she didn't?
Answer 3 - __________________________________________________

Question 4 - When she physically resisted having her hands put behind her back?
Answer 4 - ______________________________________________

Unless you're just a coward.

Your reply will show what you've decided.
Click to expand...

you got your answers. again, it's your issue of accepting it or not. were the jackboots unprofessional with threats of bodily harm in a 3 on 1 situation????????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top