anti trump protesters use pepper spray and stun guns

Just so's you know: it takes an incredibly simplistic mind to read about an incident like this, and then make a sweeping conclusion about "liberals."

It's beyond linear thinking. It really shows a lack of comprehension for how things work in the world.

Are you now willing to make the same proclamation, when a JPP liberal makes the simplistic mind approach, takes a single incident, and then makes a sweeping conclusion about the right?
 
According to the LA Times, it was both sides acting inappropriately.

the conflict turned violent as demonstrators on either side hurled obscenities at each other and fired pepper spray, witnesses said. An ambulance arrived to provide care for at least two young girls and a woman who were stung by pepper spray. Television news video of the clash appeared to show a pro-Trump demonstrator lunging with a Taser at an opponent.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...outside-anaheim-city-hall-20160426-story.html

But those two little girls and that old man, deserved to be pepper-sprayed; because they must be traitors to other Hispanics, right??
 
Are you now willing to make the same proclamation, when a JPP liberal makes the simplistic mind approach, takes a single incident, and then makes a sweeping conclusion about the right?

I've done that fairly consistently, for both sides.

I can't remember, though - when was the last time you were concerned about a rightie having double-standards?
 
So, because of the incident, and the absence of condemnation from "libs on JPP"...you feel scientifically sound in making broad, sweeping statements about liberals in general?

Let Conservatives not condemn something Liberals believe is wrong and Liberals do just that.
 
You've done that consistently? Liar.

Over the years, sure. I've done it w/ some of the blanket statements about Christians, and certainly some of the blanket statements about some of the more extreme groups on the right.

What you & USF are doing right now is projecting. Because you are such right-wing hacks & it would be completely foreign to you to call out your "side," you think everyone else is a hack & the same way. I'm neither a liberal or conservative, nor a Democrat or Republican, so your hackish projections do not apply to me.
 
Over the years, sure. I've done it w/ some of the blanket statements about Christians, and certainly some of the blanket statements about some of the more extreme groups on the right.

What you & USF are doing right now is projecting. Because you are such right-wing hacks & it would be completely foreign to you to call out your "side," you think everyone else is a hack & the same way. I'm neither a liberal or conservative, nor a Democrat or Republican, so your hackish projections do not apply to me.

Yet no examples of you having done what you said.

It's not projecting when you claim something you haven't proven.
 
I've done that fairly consistently, for both sides.

I can't remember, though - when was the last time you were concerned about a rightie having double-standards?

When was the last time you chastised a JPP liberal for making a sweeping accusation?
I'm not the one who decided to attempt to post the disclaimer; so why are you trying to make this now, about me??
 
Yet no examples of you having done what you said.

It's not projecting when you claim something you haven't proven.

I gave you examples. Those are just the ones that came to mind.

I've had many arguments w/ the more liberal posters on this site - about privatizing SS, global warming and race-baiting, among other topics. I'm not beholden to a group here. You are - ergo, your projection.
 
Over the years, sure. I've done it w/ some of the blanket statements about Christians, and certainly some of the blanket statements about some of the more extreme groups on the right.

What you & USF are doing right now is projecting. Because you are such right-wing hacks & it would be completely foreign to you to call out your "side," you think everyone else is a hack & the same way. I'm neither a liberal or conservative, nor a Democrat or Republican, so your hackish projections do not apply to me.

I love the inclusion of "with some"; because now it gives you an out. :good4u:
 
When was the last time you chastised a JPP liberal for making a sweeping accusation?
I'm not the one who decided to attempt to post the disclaimer; so why are you trying to make this now, about me??

Well, if you're going to try to call someone out, you had better be 100% that you're doing the same thing you're calling that poster out for...no?

Just a few days ago, I called desh out for her BS race-baiting & trying to portray all Republicans and other conservatives as racists. So there. Good enough timeframe for ya?
 
I love the inclusion of "with some"; because now it gives you an out. :good4u:

LOL - just accurate. It would be dishonest for me to say that I've called out every single incidence of that on this board. I'm sure I haven't even read every incidence.

What will placate your need for a "gotcha"? How about if I start a daily thread, calling out all of those who generalize about Christians proactively?
 
I gave you examples. Those are just the ones that came to mind.

I've had many arguments w/ the more liberal posters on this site - about privatizing SS, global warming and race-baiting, among other topics. I'm not beholden to a group here. You are - ergo, your projection.

How is that an example of you chastising a JPP liberal for making a "sweeping generalization"?
 
Well, if you're going to try to call someone out, you had better be 100% that you're doing the same thing you're calling that poster out for...no?

Just a few days ago, I called desh out for her BS race-baiting & trying to portray all Republicans and other conservatives as racists. So there. Good enough timeframe for ya?

Oh, come on now.
You're going to use Desh as your prime example; because the majority of the posters on here, don't agree with 5% of what she says.

Please put more effort into this. :palm:
 
Oh, come on now.
You're going to use Desh as your prime example; because the majority of the posters on here, don't agree with 5% of what she says.

Please put more effort into this. :palm:

LOL - sure thing. And I'll list more examples, and you'll have more disclaimers, and so on.

I don't have to prove my independent nature to a koolaid-drenched hack like you. I've presented plenty more than you'll ever do on this board when it comes to right-wing posters.
 
LOL - just accurate. It would be dishonest for me to say that I've called out every single incidence of that on this board. I'm sure I haven't even read every incidence.

What will placate your need for a "gotcha"? How about if I start a daily thread, calling out all of those who generalize about Christians proactively?

This isn't about a gotcha moment; but it is about your decision to defend liberals, instead of condemning the behavior.
 
Back
Top