You have no RIGHT to post on JPP, social media, or anywhere else that you did not cre

B

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
Listening to all the right-wing noise about being “censored “ from posting on social media platforms they did not create just gets dumber by the hour. No one has a right to post on any platform at any time. Posting is granted based on your adherence to terms of use, and anyone can be banned from posting for as long as the platform creators choose to ban you if you choose to ignore the terms that granted you access.

One would think this concept would be pretty simple and easy to understand, but it isn’t for people who cannot figure out how voting machines and elections work. They’d rather whine like babies and feign butt-hurt insult than simply adhere to the rules. They’d rather claim they have no other way to communicate unless platform owners give them access to users that they themselves did not gather. And they believe they have a right to say whatever they want to say under the guise of “freedom of speech” while they take no responsibility for the guidelines that the owners must follow.

Those making such claims are ignorant babies and should be ignored.
 
blackascoal said:
Listening to all the right-wing noise about being “censored “ from posting on social media platforms they did not create just gets dumber by the hour. No one has a right to post on any platform at any time. Posting is granted based on your adherence to terms of use, and anyone can be banned from posting for as long as the platform creators choose to ban you if you choose to ignore the terms that granted you access.

One would think this concept would be pretty simple and easy to understand, but it isn’t for people who cannot figure out how voting machines and elections work. They’d rather whine like babies and feign butt-hurt insult than simply adhere to the rules. They’d rather claim they have no other way to communicate unless platform owners give them access to users that they themselves did not gather. And they believe they have a right to say whatever they want to say under the guise of “freedom of speech” while they take no responsibility for the guidelines that the owners must follow.

Those making such claims are ignorant babies and should be ignored.
Click to expand...

I am currently in the middle of a 30 day ban from facebook because I called Ted Cruz a fake christian pig. That must mean I am a conservative, since according to fox and trump and the clowns who believe their shit, conservatives are the only ones ever banned.
 
blackascoal said:
Listening to all the right-wing noise about being “censored “ from posting on social media platforms they did not create just gets dumber by the hour. No one has a right to post on any platform at any time. Posting is granted based on your adherence to terms of use, and anyone can be banned from posting for as long as the platform creators choose to ban you if you choose to ignore the terms that granted you access.

One would think this concept would be pretty simple and easy to understand, but it isn’t for people who cannot figure out how voting machines and elections work. They’d rather whine like babies and feign butt-hurt insult than simply adhere to the rules. They’d rather claim they have no other way to communicate unless platform owners give them access to users that they themselves did not gather. And they believe they have a right to say whatever they want to say under the guise of “freedom of speech” while they take no responsibility for the guidelines that the owners must follow.

Those making such claims are ignorant babies and should be ignored.
Click to expand...

Well, you have no idea how voting machines work. You don't have a right to make this post either.
 
anatta said:
dont waste my time. selective banning is acting like a publisher controlling content
Section 230 give protection from lawsuits because of that -yet the capricious banning remains
Click to expand...

You're wasting our times with your lies. If you don't want people to confront you for lying, then stop lying or posting for that matter.
 
blackascoal said:
Listening to all the right-wing noise about being “censored “ from posting on social media platforms they did not create just gets dumber by the hour. No one has a right to post on any platform at any time. Posting is granted based on your adherence to terms of use, and anyone can be banned from posting for as long as the platform creators choose to ban you if you choose to ignore the terms that granted you access.

One would think this concept would be pretty simple and easy to understand, but it isn’t for people who cannot figure out how voting machines and elections work. They’d rather whine like babies and feign butt-hurt insult than simply adhere to the rules. They’d rather claim they have no other way to communicate unless platform owners give them access to users that they themselves did not gather. And they believe they have a right to say whatever they want to say under the guise of “freedom of speech” while they take no responsibility for the guidelines that the owners must follow.

Those making such claims are ignorant babies and should be ignored.
Click to expand...


Then Diane Feinstein must be a baby according to you.

“Four years ago, in the wake of serious problems with hanging chads on punch-card ballots, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act to modernize the nation’s voting systems,” Senator Feinstein said. “But now, we are hearing of serious problems with electronic voting machines, the training of poll workers and in the establishment of electronic voting databases.”

Senator Feinstein, a senior member of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, plans to seek hearings in the committee on these problems and others that may arise during the election to consider what revisions of the Help America Vote Act may be necessary to ensure fair and accurate federal elections.

According to a 75-page report released this week by the nonpartisan Election Reform Information Project, which tracks electoral reforms across the United States, “as the mid-term elections approach, machine failures, database delays and foul-ups, inconsistent procedures, new rules and new equipment have some predicting chaos at the polls at worst and widespread polling place snafus at best.”
Click to expand...

https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/pu...eases?ID=792A0E62-7E9C-9AF9-7478-7AD49DB4DEC8

Back in 2016, Hillary Clinton was saying much the same things as Trump about voting machines.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...swing-states-scientists-lawyers-a7433091.html
 
Last edited:
AProudLefty said:
I am not like Lesion, having the entire JPP posts stored on his lame database.

But I will explain.

Ayotollah Khamenei did not violate ToS so far AFAIK.
Click to expand...

Yeh well you didn't look very hard, otherwise you'd have found these!!

A Twitter spokeswoman has defended the company’s decision to block and restrict tweets from President Trump but not those of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei which call for genocide of the Israeli people.

The reason? Because the Iranian dictator’s tweets pass as “commentary on political issues of the day” while Trump’s could “inspire harm,” Twitter claims.

During a hearing on antisemitism in front of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament in Jerusalem, lawmakers grilled a Twitter representative over why the platform was policing missives from Trump, but not other world leaders such as Khamenei calling Israel “a cancerous growth.”

“You have recently started flagging the tweets of President Trump,” noted Arsen Ostrovsky, a human rights lawyer and executive director of the Israeli-Jewish Congress.
Click to expand...

https://nypost.com/2020/07/29/twitt...rump-tweets-but-not-irans-ayatollah-khamenei/

Twitter executives last month rebuffed a request from the Israeli government to remove tweets from Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calling for the genocide of the Israeli people — claiming in a stunning letter obtained by The Post that the Jew-hate qualified as “comments on current affairs.”

The decision comes after the social media giant recently began policing President Trump’s tweets, alleging they “glorify violence” and spread misinformation about mail-in voting.
Click to expand...

https://nypost.com/2020/07/30/twitter-execs-refused-request-to-remove-ayatollah-khamenei-tweets/
 
Last edited:
Primavera said:
Yeh well you didn't look very hard, otherwise you'd have found these!!


A Twitter spokeswoman has defended the company’s decision to block and restrict tweets from President Trump but not those of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei which call for genocide of the Israeli people.

The reason? Because the Iranian dictator’s tweets pass as “commentary on political issues of the day” while Trump’s could “inspire harm,” Twitter claims.

During a hearing on antisemitism in front of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament in Jerusalem, lawmakers grilled a Twitter representative over why the platform was policing missives from Trump, but not other world leaders such as Khamenei calling Israel “a cancerous growth.”

“You have recently started flagging the tweets of President Trump,” noted Arsen Ostrovsky, a human rights lawyer and executive director of the Israeli-Jewish Congress.

https://nypost.com/2020/07/29/twitt...rump-tweets-but-not-irans-ayatollah-khamenei/

https://nypost.com/2020/07/30/twitter-execs-refused-request-to-remove-ayatollah-khamenei-tweets/
Click to expand...

Where's the offending tweet?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top