Would you still support the DNC if they betrayed the country?

If the DNC openly betrayed America, would you still support them?

There is no room in a lefty's mind to process such a thought. They will only be able to reply that it will never happen. They may also avoid answering this altogether by asking if you would support Repubs if the RNC betrayed America, or by simply not posting anything at all.
 
This is the problem with being a mindless partisan idiot. About 40% of America has taken the Republican Party ahead of their country. No one can think having a president who is at best a teenager emotionally is good for the country. The White House is currently more Animal House. All I want from the politicals is whatever is best for my country all the time. The RWers thinking some other political group are mindlessly partisan is kinda cute.
 
No. Now how about someone answer that about Trump, rather then beat around the bush, tossing out bullshit.
 
They support burning our flag. They support killing unborn children. They support bigotry and racial divide (everyone's a racist but them). They support violent protests. They support hating a duly elected president. They want to tear down historical monuments...
Why wouldn't they support the DNC if they betrayed the country? Look at some of the posts on this forum.
 
The DNC has lost hope, and they did it to themselves.

Ive never in my lifetime seen a party, this close to a mid-term election with so much at stake, still not have a message to put their agendas forward, for country.
Trump is bad is all they have.

At least make something up
 
The DNC has lost hope, and they did it to themselves.

Ive never in my lifetime seen a party, this close to a mid-term election with so much at stake, still not have a message to put their agendas forward, for country.
Trump is bad is all they have.

At least make something up

They do that all the time. Look at Burpin's post.
 
The DNC doesn't have 87 Russian Contacts, half indicted ... sorry :rolleyes:

Oh, no?

It's not just the Clintons who are implicated in a uranium deal with the Russians that compromised national-security interests.

The cool half-million the Putin regime funneled to Bill Clinton was five times the amount it spent on those Facebook ads — the ones the media-DEMOCRAT complex ludicrously suggests swung the 2016 presidential election to Trump.

By contrast, the staggering $500,000 payday from a Kremlin-tied Russian bank for a single speech looks like part of a multi-million-dollar influence-peddling scheme to enrich the former president and his wife.

At the time, Russia was plotting — successfully — to secure U.S. government approval for its acquisition of Uranium One, and with it, tens of billions of dollars in U.S. uranium reserves.

The Uranium One scandal is not only, or even principally, a Clinton scandal.

It is an Obama-administration scandal. The Clintons were just doing what the Clintons do. The Obama administration, with Secretary Clinton at the forefront but hardly alone, was knowingly compromising American national-security interests.

The administration green-lighted the transfer of control over one-fifth of American uranium-mining capacity to Russia, a hostile regime — and specifically to Russia’s state-controlled nuclear-energy conglomerate, Rosatom.

Worse, at the time the administration approved the transfer, it knew that Rosatom’s American subsidiary was engaged in a lucrative racketeering enterprise that had already committed felony extortion, fraud, and money-laundering offenses.

The Obama administration also knew that congressional Republicans were trying to stop the transfer. Consequently, the Justice Department concealed what it knew.

DOJ allowed the racketeering enterprise to continue compromising the American uranium industry rather than commencing a prosecution that would have scotched the transfer.

Prosecutors waited four years before quietly pleading the case out for a song, in violation of Justice Department charging guidelines. Meanwhile, the administration stonewalled Congress, reportedly threatening an informant who wanted to go public.

The first-tier military arsenal of Putin’s Russia belies its status as a third-rate economic power. For well over a decade, the regime has thus sought to develop and exploit its capacity as a nuclear-energy producer.

Naïvely viewing Russia as a “strategic partner” rather than a malevolent competitor, the Bush administration made a nuclear-cooperation agreement with the Kremlin in May 2008.

That blunder, however, was tabled before Congress could consider it.

That is because Russia, being Russia, invaded Georgia.

In 2009, notwithstanding this aggression (which continues to this day with Russia’s occupation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia), President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton signaled the new administration’s determination to “reset” relations with Moscow. In this reset, renewed cooperation and commerce in nuclear energy would be central.

There had been such cooperation and commerce since the Soviet Union imploded. In 1992, the administration of President George H. W. Bush agreed with the nascent Russian federation that U.S. nuclear providers would be permitted to purchase uranium from Russia’s disassembled nuclear warheads (after it had been down-blended from its highly enriched weapons-grade level).

The Russian commercial agent responsible for the sale and transportation of this uranium to the U.S. is the Kremlin-controlled company “Tenex” (formally, JSC Techsnabexport). Tenex is a subsidiary of Rosatom. Tenex (and by extension, Rosatom) have an American arm called “Tenam USA.” Tenam is based in Bethesda, Md.

Around the time President Obama came to power, the Russian official in charge of Tenam was Vadim Mikerin.

The Obama administration reportedly issued a visa for Mikerin in 2010, but a racketeering investigation led by the FBI determined that he was already operating here in 2009.


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452972/uranium-one-deal-obama-administration-doj-hillary-clinton-racketeering

Have another drink, whitey.
 
They support burning our flag.

No, they don't, you lying whore. They support the right to do so, not the act itself.
They support killing unborn children.

No, they don't, you lying whore. They support the right of women to control their own bodies.
They support bigotry and racial divide (everyone's a racist but them).

No, they don't, you lying whore, nor can you show that they do.
They support violent protests.

No, they don't, you lying whore, they support the right to protest.
They support hating a duly elected president.

No, they don't, you lying whore.
They want to tear down historical monuments...

No, they don't, you lying whore, they support removal of monuments to treason and traitors. Odd that you choose to honor treason and traitors.
Why wouldn't they support the DNC if they betrayed the country? Look at some of the posts on this forum.

Why do you hate the United States?
 
The DNC has lost hope, and they did it to themselves.

Ive never in my lifetime seen a party, this close to a mid-term election with so much at stake, still not have a message to put their agendas forward, for country.
Trump is bad is all they have.

At least make something up

Seriously? For a midterm election?

If there is a national message, we generally haven't seen that until the fall campaigns actually kick in. But in midterms, it's all about the local races & candidates. With a few exceptions - like under Gingrich - there hasn't been as much of a nationalized platform like there is in Presidential years.
 
No, they don't, you lying whore. They support the right to do so, not the act itself.

No, they don't, you lying whore. They support the right of women to control their own bodies.

No, they don't, you lying whore, nor can you show that they do.

No, they don't, you lying whore, they support the right to protest.

No, they don't, you lying whore.

No, they don't, you lying whore, they support removal of monuments to treason and traitors. Odd that you choose to honor treason and traitors.

Why do you hate the United States?

:wellplayed:
 
Back
Top