Would You Hire This Lawyer?

1) New York is a one-party consent law as far as recording conversations

2) It likely breaches all sorts of professional ethics but it isn't like he will have a license when this is over anyway.

3) I cannot imagine there would be anything on them that would stand up on appeal if introduced at the trial of Donald Trump. Attorney-Client privilege belongs to the client, not the attorney.
 
Would you hire a lawyer who taped his previous clients?

President Trump Speaks out on Alleged Cohen Recording

President Donald J. Trump tweeted today that the federal government’s raid of his former attorney, Michael Cohen, was “inconceivable” but that Cohen’s alleged taping of his conversations with Trump are “totally unheard of & perhaps illegal.”

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timot...peaks-out-on-alleged-cohen-recording-n2502448

Sure. Trump did nothing wrong, so...
 
Cohen has the goods on Daffy Dawn, and the recordings of Daffy to back it all up, comrade hvilleherb.

Trump threw the wrong guy under the bus this time.
 
Is that so, dear Brother?

Who told you that?

Ghouliani acknowledges that Cohen had taped conferences with Daffy where Trump and Cohen discussed buying the rights to McDougal's story from the Enquirer — essentially a reimbursement.
Ghouliani wouldn't lie about something like that, would he, brother?
 
Ghouliani acknowledges that Cohen had taped conferences with Daffy where Trump and Cohen discussed buying the rights to McDougal's story from the Enquirer — essentially a reimbursement. Ghouliani wouldn't lie about something like that, would he, brother?

"Essentially"?

Now, now, dear Brother. :D
 
"Essentially", or factually, dear Brother?

I would ask of you brother, what would it appear to be if one did not harbor any preconceived notions about who did what?
Even if you were to say that the exact dollar figure was pure coincidence, what were they possibly paying the Enquirer $150,000 for?
Factually it appears to be a reimbursement for the buying of her story. Don't you have to agree?
Of course one sentence of Cohen testimony could clear up any question in a heartbeat.
 
Would you hire a lawyer who taped his previous clients?

President Trump Speaks out on Alleged Cohen Recording

President Donald J. Trump tweeted today that the federal government’s raid of his former attorney, Michael Cohen, was “inconceivable” but that Cohen’s alleged taping of his conversations with Trump are “totally unheard of & perhaps illegal.”

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timot...peaks-out-on-alleged-cohen-recording-n2502448

Nope. But Orangetweet is pretty fucking stupid.
 
He likes the word "essentially" and he used it extensively, by referring to bump stocks semi automatics as being "essentially" automatics.

M60 machine gun: 500-600 rpm
M240 machine gun: 650-950 rpm
Bump stock: 400-800 rpm

Dumbfuck

But then again, you were the idiot that said there were such big insects and plants millions of years ago, so high levels of CO2 is a good thing. Damn! I'm still laughing at that knee-slapper!
 
Not many are more stupid than hvilleherb.

With a high degree of certainty, one can bet that every source he cites comes from the lower right quadrant.

Media-Bias-Chart_Version-3.1_Watermark-min-1024x759.jpg
 
M60 machine gun: 500-600 rpm
M240 machine gun: 650-950 rpm
Bump stock: 400-800 rpm

Dumbfuck

But then again, you were the idiot that said there were such big insects and plants millions of years ago, so high levels of CO2 is a good thing. Damn! I'm still laughing at that knee-slapper!

And you are "essentially" an idiot; but I digress and the truth is, you are an idiot.

:truestory:
 
Back
Top