#WINNING

Teflon Don said:
I love that Trump is putting his people on the immigration courts

But hey pretend it isn’t happening because it was reported in Gateway Pundit
Click to expand...

Yes, I bet you do love the fact that Donald Trump and his BITCH- McConnell are giving lifetime appointments to the Highest Courts in the land- WITH KNOWN RACISTS THAT HAVE NEVER HAD A LAW DEGREE- NEVER TRIED A CASE- NEVER EVEN ATTENDED COLLEGE!

YOU RACIST MOTHERFUCKERS ARE A DISGRACE!
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Yes, I bet you do love the fact that Donald Trump and his BITCH- McConnell are giving lifetime appointments to the Highest Courts in the land- WITH KNOWN RACISTS THAT HAVE NEVER HAD A LAW DEGREE- NEVER TRIED A CASE- NEVER EVEN ATTENDED COLLEGE!

YOU RACIST MOTHERFUCKERS ARE A DISGRACE!
Click to expand...

AMAZINGLY RIDICULOUS, EASILY EXPOSED TOTALLY MADEUP BULLSHIT. ^^^^^^^^^^

PLEASE SHOW US ALL A JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT ON SOMEONE WHO NEVER HAD A LAW DEGREE, you LYING SACK OF SHIT.
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Yes, I bet you do love the fact that Donald Trump and his BITCH- McConnell are giving lifetime appointments to the Highest Courts in the land- WITH KNOWN RACISTS THAT HAVE NEVER HAD A LAW DEGREE- NEVER TRIED A CASE- NEVER EVEN ATTENDED COLLEGE!

YOU RACIST MOTHERFUCKERS ARE A DISGRACE!
Click to expand...

Actually Trumps judicial appointments are more qualified than Obamas

True story bro
 
Grokmaster said:
AMAZINGLY RIDICULOUS, EASILY EXPOSED TOTALLY MADEUP BULLSHIT. ^^^^^^^^^^

PLEASE SHOW US ALL A JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT ON SOMEONE WHO NEVER HAD A LAW DEGREE, you LYING SACK OF SHIT.
Click to expand...

Supreme Court hearings aside, it's rare for a judicial nominee to garner headlines. Matthew Petersen, President Donald Trump's choice for one of the nation's most important courts, is now an exception – and not in a good way.

Video of his disastrous testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday has gone viral because Petersen, who works at the Federal Elections Commission and is up for a lifetime-tenured judgeship, couldn't answer basic questions on procedures most first- or second-year law students are expected to know.

Sen. John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican, triggered the crash-and-burn testimony Wednesday after Petersen – a candidate for U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which has jurisdiction over the Capitol and the White House – acknowledged he'd never tried a case in court at any level. That fact caught Kennedy's attention, and the senator decided to examine Petersen's knowledge base.

RELATED CONTENT

Supreme Court Lifts Travel Ban Restrictions

"Have you ever tried a jury trial?" Kennedy asked.

"I have not," Petersen answered.

Kennedy: "Civil?"

Petersen: "No."

"Criminal?"

"No."

"State or federal court?"

"I have not."

The senator then drilled down even further, forcing Petersen to acknowledge he had taken only a handful of depositions in his entire career and didn't know or understand fundamentally important aspects of courtroom procedure. That included a "motion in limine" (a frequently used request to ask that testimony be excluded from a trial) or the "Daubert standard" (a rule governing expert testimony).
 
Teflon Don said:
Actually Trumps judicial appointments are more qualified than Obamas

True story bro
Click to expand...

Not true! All 55 of Obama's judges passed the ABA approval. More than half of Trump's appointments, so far, have been rejected by the ABA for lack of any courtroom experience WHAT-SO-EVER!!
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Not true! All 55 of Obama's judges passed the ABA approval. More than half of Trump's appointments, so far, have been rejected by the ABA for lack of any courtroom experience WHAT-SO-EVER!!
Click to expand...

"ABA APPROVAL" is nothing but LEFTIST POLITICS.....


Please post the ABA reasons for rejection of Trump nominees..it has NOTHING TO DO WITH "EXPERIENCE"...it's ALL LEFTIST POLITICAL BULLSHIT.
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Supreme Court hearings aside, it's rare for a judicial nominee to garner headlines. Matthew Petersen, President Donald Trump's choice for one of the nation's most important courts, is now an exception – and not in a good way.

Video of his disastrous testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday has gone viral because Petersen, who works at the Federal Elections Commission and is up for a lifetime-tenured judgeship, couldn't answer basic questions on procedures most first- or second-year law students are expected to know.

Sen. John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican, triggered the crash-and-burn testimony Wednesday after Petersen – a candidate for U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which has jurisdiction over the Capitol and the White House – acknowledged he'd never tried a case in court at any level. That fact caught Kennedy's attention, and the senator decided to examine Petersen's knowledge base.

RELATED CONTENT

Supreme Court Lifts Travel Ban Restrictions

"Have you ever tried a jury trial?" Kennedy asked.

"I have not," Petersen answered.

Kennedy: "Civil?"

Petersen: "No."

"Criminal?"

"No."

"State or federal court?"

"I have not."

The senator then drilled down even further, forcing Petersen to acknowledge he had taken only a handful of depositions in his entire career and didn't know or understand fundamentally important aspects of courtroom procedure. That included a "motion in limine" (a frequently used request to ask that testimony be excluded from a trial) or the "Daubert standard" (a rule governing expert testimony).
Click to expand...

ONE GUY, in 2017...and He HAS A LAW DEGREE FROM U of VIRGINIA, LIAR.

" My background is not in litigation...And I understand, and I appreciate this line of questioning. I understand the challenge that would be ahead of me if I were fortunate enough to become a district court judge. I understand that the path that many successful district court judges have taken has been a different one than I have taken. But as I mentioned in my earlier answer, I believe that the path that I have taken to be one who’s been in a decision-making role in somewhere between 1,500 and 2,000 enforcement matters, overseen I don’t know how many cases in federal court the administration has been a party to during my time."[13]
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Not true! All 55 of Obama's judges passed the ABA approval. More than half of Trump's appointments, so far, have been rejected by the ABA for lack of any courtroom experience WHAT-SO-EVER!!
Click to expand...

Don’t care about leftist ABA

Trump nominees have something far better. Supreme Court clerkship. By that standard Trump kicks Obamas ass

Ask Jarod if he had a Supreme Court clerkship
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top