Wikileaks Exposed For Making Up Random Facts To Hurt Hillary Clinton

zappasguitar

Well-known member
Wikileaks Exposed For Making Up Random Facts To Hurt Hillary Clinton


Oh, WikiLeaks — that organized crime group that enjoys hyping up those observing the group’s Hillary Clinton-bashing antics.

WikiLeaks is a criminal group. Thus, the founder and head of the organization, Julian Assange, is currently a criminal.

On Thursday, the WikiLeaks Twitter page published one of the tens of thousands of emails from Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state.

The release from WikiLeaks gives no context whatsoever, but simply consists of an email from longtime top Clinton aide, Huma Abedin, to the then-secretary of state.

In the email, Abedin asks Clinton, “Did [you] take your earpiece or do I need to get it?”

The email, embedded in a tweet from WikiLeaks, as well as the rest of the article, can be seen at:

http://bipartisanreport.com/2016/09...random-facts-to-hurt-hillary-clinton-details/
 
Abedin @ state.goy? :rofl2:

Wikileaks is pretty sloppy. If I sent an email with a bad addy it would come right back as undeliverable.
 
The point is that she is accustomed to using one and did, in fact, use one.

As did the others at the UN. Your point?

2madaaZmhuH_2yIlTgGVmqVKBUmLlKUj8SZtgOLKpEG6RC-Pc6VHCmqERQ06D8zWjAGqNw=s112
 
remember when wikileaks exposed republican activity and the libs were ambivalent, but quietly thrilled?

of course. they are such fucking hypocrites. it's pathetic. For the record, I have always loved wikileaks, no matter who they expose. Government transparency is important.

These same retards calling wikileaks 'a criminal organization' were in full support of it when mandude bradley chelsea manning leaked dox to it that made the military look bad.
 
@Zappas

Yes, Assange is a felon, because he committed two counts of rape in Sweden. It's the primary reason he fled the country. I don't know what the legality is for Wikileaks publishing stolen government documents from third party sources (it isn't exactly copyright law). Personally, I have always opposed Assange, and, to a large extent, Edward Snowden.
 
Abedin @ state.goy? :rofl2:

Wikileaks is pretty sloppy. If I sent an email with a bad addy it would come right back as undeliverable.

Did you fail to see this at the link...???

For the record, the error in Abedin’s email address, which reads in WikiLeaks’s tweet as “AbedinH@state.goy,” is clerical, and the same email with the correct email address can be found sourced from the State Department.
 
The rape charges were bullshit and have been dropped now. Also he was not accused of rape they just wanted to question him. It was a ruse for the USA to snap him up
 
Two counts. Some people will argue that the statute of lying to women about using protection should not be included in rape, but, I think it's a messed-up thing to do.

Also, by what grounds would we have received his extradition for committing Swedish crimes against Swedish citizens?
 
The rape charges were bullshit and have been dropped now. Also he was not accused of rape they just wanted to question him. It was a ruse for the USA to snap him up
How dare you say that, you misogynistic pig. Don't you know that a woman never lies or would allow herself to be used as a honeytrap for the US government?
Two counts. Some people will argue that the statute of lying to women about using protection should not be included in rape, but, I think it's a messed-up thing to do.

Also, by what grounds would we have received his extradition for committing Swedish crimes against Swedish citizens?


Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
Two counts. Some people will argue that the statute of lying to women about using protection should not be included in rape, but, I think it's a messed-up thing to do.

Also, by what grounds would we have received his extradition for committing Swedish crimes against Swedish citizens?

we would have nabbed him for the bradley leaks stuff among other things. the usa was very interested in grabbing him which is why he was holed up in an embassy. He even offered to do an interview with the swedes over skype (he was never charged with anything btw and still isn't)
 
The Swedes must be a bunch of rape-loving Toms, then. If the New York Times could publish the Pentagon Papers, I see no legal avenue for the government to have gone after Assange for essentially doing the same thing. Especially since it appears that the current Justice Department doesn't really believe in bringing charges against people for compromising national secrets...
 
Wikileaks Exposed For Making Up Random Facts To Hurt Hillary Clinton


Oh, WikiLeaks — that organized crime group that enjoys hyping up those observing the group’s Hillary Clinton-bashing antics.

WikiLeaks is a criminal group. Thus, the founder and head of the organization, Julian Assange, is currently a criminal.

On Thursday, the WikiLeaks Twitter page published one of the tens of thousands of emails from Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state.

The release from WikiLeaks gives no context whatsoever, but simply consists of an email from longtime top Clinton aide, Huma Abedin, to the then-secretary of state.

In the email, Abedin asks Clinton, “Did [you] take your earpiece or do I need to get it?”

The email, embedded in a tweet from WikiLeaks, as well as the rest of the article, can be seen at:

http://bipartisanreport.com/2016/09...random-facts-to-hurt-hillary-clinton-details/

They didnt make up anything you lying faggot, that was a real email written by the Muslim Brotherhood whore to Clinton.
 
Wikileaks Exposed For Making Up Random Facts To Hurt Hillary Clinton


Oh, WikiLeaks — that organized crime group that enjoys hyping up those observing the group’s Hillary Clinton-bashing antics.

WikiLeaks is a criminal group. Thus, the founder and head of the organization, Julian Assange, is currently a criminal.

On Thursday, the WikiLeaks Twitter page published one of the tens of thousands of emails from Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state.

The release from WikiLeaks gives no context whatsoever, but simply consists of an email from longtime top Clinton aide, Huma Abedin, to the then-secretary of state.

In the email, Abedin asks Clinton, “Did [you] take your earpiece or do I need to get it?”

The email, embedded in a tweet from WikiLeaks, as well as the rest of the article, can be seen at:

http://bipartisanreport.com/2016/09...random-facts-to-hurt-hillary-clinton-details/

so its your position that the email from Huma was made up by Wikileaks?.......
 
Back
Top