Why we have a problem- sanctuary movement grows for immigrants here illegally

[Truth Detector]

Another reason why we have such a massive problem with illegals in this country besides the fact that Democratic politicians ignore the law; church leaders thumb their noses at it as well:

After recent ICE raids, sanctuary movement grows for immigrants here illegally

Morris, currently leading North Hills United Methodist Church, survived detention and torture at the hands of Brazil's military dictatorship in 1974.

That's one reason Morris said he's ready to defy Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials and offer his place of worship as a refuge for Central Americans facing imminent deportation to a region with escalating violence.

"We are willing to fight this tooth and nail," said Morris, 82. "If ICE wants to come get them, they're going to have to break down the church door."

http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-immigration-sanctuary-revival-20160208-story.html

We don't need to break down your door; we'll just arrest your dumb ass when you come out to get groceries.

 

[moon]

You ought to read some Steinbeck. Are you into authoritative American literature ? Try ' The Grapes of Wrath ' for starters.

To an indigenous North American you're an illegal.

Now how about expanding your ever-growing list of decent folk barred from your ...er....threads. ? I note my absence from it with a pang of dishonor.

PS- you couldn't ' detect truth ' if it was hammered up your ass with a mallet.

 

[CFM]

You ought to read some Steinbeck. Are you into authoritative American literature ? Try ' The Grapes of Wrath ' for starters.

To an indigenous North American you're an illegal.

Now how about expanding your ever-growing list of decent folk barred from your ...er....threads. ? I note my absence from it with a pang of dishonor.

PS- you couldn't ' detect truth ' if it was hammered up your ass with a mallet.

How can something be illegal if there wasn't a law in place saying so when it comes to the indigenous statement?

 

[Truth Detector]

You ought to read some Steinbeck. Are you into authoritative American literature ? Try ' The Grapes of Wrath ' for starters.

To an indigenous North American you're an illegal.

Now how about expanding your ever-growing list of decent folk barred from your ...er....threads. ? I note my absence from it with a pang of dishonor.

PS- you couldn't ' detect truth ' if it was hammered up your ass with a mallet.

I think you should try extracting that empty head of yours from your dumb asshole and get some fresh air into that tiny lemming like brain of yours.

I am amused that you stupidly think you could comprehend the "truth."

 

[Truth Detector]

How can something be illegal if there wasn't a law in place saying so when it comes to the indigenous statement?

Remember, you're talking to a dumbfuck; dumbfucks don't deal with reality or the facts.....just emotional hysterics.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

How can something be illegal if there wasn't a law in place saying so when it comes to the indigenous statement?

how does the simple making of a law make something illegal when it goes directly against the constitution?

 

[Truth Detector]

how does the simple making of a law make something illegal when it goes directly against the constitution?

When did "indigenous North Americans" have a Constitution genius? You might want to read the screed from the anti-semitic MoonTard before you erupt.

 

[moon]

How can something be illegal if there wasn't a law in place saying so when it comes to the indigenous statement?

Well, concepts of 'legality ' change over time- I'm sure you know that. Some folk are born with ' law ' in their chest. Some call it natural law.

 

[Truth Detector]

Well, concepts of 'legality ' change over time- I'm sure you know that. Some folk are born with ' law ' in their chest. Some call it natural law.

That wasn't the question dumbfuck. Isn't that like the typical America hating lefty to avoid answering anything honestly while erupting with their emotional bile.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

When did "indigenous North Americans" have a Constitution genius?

On July 26, 1827, the Cherokee Constitutional Convention drafted this constitution. The document outlined a structure of government for the Cherokee Nation. This system, included an elected principal chief, a senate, and a house of representatives. A full-blood faction led by White Path had formed a rebel council to oppose the convention in February 1827. The mixed-blood leader John Ross, who later chaired the convention, defused White Path's Rebellion by assuring the rebels that their views would be taken into consideration at the convention.

cherokee constitution of 1827

You might want to read the screed from the anti-semitic MoonTard before you erupt.

I wasn't replying to that idiot. I was replying to the other idiot.

 

[Truth Detector]

On July 26, 1827, the Cherokee Constitutional Convention drafted this constitution. The document outlined a structure of government for the Cherokee Nation. This system, included an elected principal chief, a senate, and a house of representatives. A full-blood faction led by White Path had formed a rebel council to oppose the convention in February 1827. The mixed-blood leader John Ross, who later chaired the convention, defused White Path's Rebellion by assuring the rebels that their views would be taken into consideration at the convention.

The nation was created in 1776. Until then, the Cherokee Nation didn't even know what a Constitution was or meant. DER.

cherokee constitution of 1827

I wasn't replying to that idiot. I was replying to the other idiot.

I am seeing a few new idiots on the forum while I have been away on a better forum. They fit in quite nicely here.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The nation was created in 1776. Until then, the Cherokee Nation didn't even know what a Constitution was or meant. DER.

what does that have to do with the question YOU asked? let me remind you of the question you asked....

Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
When did "indigenous North Americans" have a Constitution genius?

 

[CFM]

what does that have to do with the question YOU asked? let me remind you of the question you asked....

Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
When did "indigenous North Americans" have a Constitution genius?

The idiot that brought up that indigenous people would consider me illegal was referencing exploration. Apparently you can't determine that 1827 was hundreds of years AFTER exploration began.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The idiot that brought up that indigenous people would consider me illegal was referencing exploration. Apparently you can't determine that 1827 was hundreds of years AFTER exploration began.

again, I wasn't replying to THAT idiot, I was replying to YOUR idiocy about laws. As to the indigenous people considering white americans as illegals....that wouldn't be true at all. as i've been frequently told, they had a crappy immigration policy. must like the leftist morons want today.

 

[transwarpdrive]

Remember, you're talking to a dumbfuck; dumbfucks don't deal with reality or the facts.....just emotional hysterics.

Discussing moon the cunt like that is being far too generous IMO, they are way, way less intelligent than just a dumb fuck - they are mentally insane and immeasurably fucking stupid.

 

[moon]

I wasn't replying to that idiot. I was replying to the other idiot.

When explaining to an idiot you have to be more specific as to which of a general spread of idiots your idiot address was directed.

Now then, over to the colonists.........

 

[CFM]

again, I wasn't replying to THAT idiot, I was replying to YOUR idiocy about laws. As to the indigenous people considering white americans as illegals....that wouldn't be true at all. as i've been frequently told, they had a crappy immigration policy. must like the leftist morons want today.

My statement wasn't a general one but a specific one to the statement about indigenous people not having anything that made what the explorers did illegal as there were no laws saying so.

You replied to me in a context in which my statement wasn't even closely related. Mine was specific and you go on about something unrelated to what I said. That makes you an idiot bec cause you can't pay attention to something that simple.

 

[CFM]

When explaining to an idiot you have to be more specific as to which of a general spread of idiots your idiot address was directed.

Now then, over to the colonists.........

He was replying to me in a context totally unrelated to my statement. He's a moron Libertarian that thinks anything done by the government that he DISAGREES with is unreasonable and a violation of the Constitution. He's indicated that it was wrong for the other driver, one determined to be under the influence of drugs, to be charged with a wreck I was in because the police used a dog in a search of the vehicle. In other words, he would have the innocent person, me, be charged because he hates police. He's opposed to license checks and DUI checkpoints. I guess he'd prefer some innocent person be killed by one instead of keeping them off the road.

 

[moon]

My statement wasn't a general one but a specific one to the statement about indigenous people not having anything that made what the explorers did illegal as there were no laws saying so.

" Explorers " ? Who do you mean ? St. Brendan ? Amerigo Vespucci ? Christopher Columbus ? Polynesian seafarers ? the Brownist English Dissenters ?

 

[Darth Omar]

On July 26, 1827, the Cherokee Constitutional Convention drafted this constitution. The document outlined a structure of government for the Cherokee Nation. This system, included an elected principal chief, a senate, and a house of representatives. A full-blood faction led by White Path had formed a rebel council to oppose the convention in February 1827. The mixed-blood leader John Ross, who later chaired the convention, defused White Path's Rebellion by assuring the rebels that their views would be taken into consideration at the convention.

cherokee constitution of 1827

That's interesting. The Cherokees drafted a constitution and became westernized in the process.

Prior to being exposed to such western concepts as land ownership the Indians didn't own land. So, there were no laws to be broken. Also, the left tends to romanticize the Indian natives into noble brown skins that only exist in their imaginations. The fact is, they brutally fought amongst themselves [as all humans are want to do, everywhere] and they did some nasty things to the white European settlers, who of course, returned the favor.

And you know what else? There wasn't a Muslim in sight lol.