Why scientists disagree about global warming

I can't believe people who claim to be intelligent believe in man made global warming, but I guess they don't mind making al gore rich off of lies

I wonder what you will do when you realize you have been lied to.

You have ZERO objective evidence, yet you believe. You have been scammed by manipulated mat models


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
tinfoil said:
Skeptical science is run by fraudster John Cook
Do you like being his propaganda bitch?
Click to expand...

That effing crook has been totally discredited.

6fd9b485594f8781fd300597272e6f2f.jpg



http://climatechangedispatch.com/97-articles-refuting-the-97-consensus/

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Darth Omar said:
I read somewhere that Trump is thinking of taking a Red Team/Blue Team approach to it.

Red Team scientists are AGW skeptics and Blue Team would be Warmists. That way congress would get to see both side of the story before legislating on it.

Great idea imo.
Click to expand...
Yes that has been suggested by sceptics many times but CAGW alarmists are bitterly opposed, I wonder why?

https://judithcurry.com/2017/04/21/a-red-team-exercise-would-strengthen-climate-science/

http://www.climatedepot.com/2017/06...of-scientists-to-examine-climate-risk-of-co2/

https://andthentheresphysics.wordpress.com/2017/04/23/red-team-vs-blue-team/

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/04...am-exercise-would-strengthen-climate-science/



Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Alarmists gonna alarm

What can we do? We've seen the climate sensitivity used in the models overstates warming and leads to faulty forecasts. Yet alarmists continue to believe the faulty forecasts. We've seen natural variability (AMO, PDO, ENSO) swamp the supposed climate driver anthropogenic forcing. The hiatus proved that natural variations were far greater than had been stated by the AGW crowd. They claimed there would need to be at least 15 years of hiatus to disprove models, then when 15 years past, they moved the goalposts. The royal society went so far as to claim they would need to see 50 fucking years! LOL

The hiatus was supposedly slayed by Karl et al 2015. But they used a reconstructionof sea surface temps where they adjusted towards the warm bias and increased the global average temp. Anthropogenic signal FTW!
 
tell us all why corporations only use research modals that assume GW is real when they want to research something for real results?
 
Go look at the studies the people with big money pay for to get information to run their mega corps


they don't enlist science that calls global warming unreal


they don't waste their research money on fake sceince
 
evince said:
Go look at the studies the people with big money pay for to get information to run their mega corps


they don't enlist science that calls global warming unreal


they don't waste their research money on fake sceince
Click to expand...

go get me a study paid for by Major corporation that assumed GW is not real in its premise.



I know you will just act stupid again
 
My god, stop quoting that idiot evince! I've got her on ignore and I don't want to see her posts! They just make my brain hurt trying to decipher what she's trying to say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top