That defies liberal understanding of economics. They think that there is a finite pool of wealth, and therefore there are rich at the expense of the poor.
Has there been a year since Reagan where the gap between the rich & the poor didn't increase?
See what I mean?
Can't answer the question, eh?
You seem to have a problem w/ actual stats.
I did answer the question; just not at the 4th grade level so you could understand.
No, you didn't really. Because that gap continues to grow. And that's a pretty sad reflection on supply side.
Has there been a year since Reagan where the gap between the rich & the poor didn't increase?
Because the plutocracy makes all the monetary gains while wage stagnate? Trickle down is bullcrap.
You gotta raise GDP - while allows expansion of the wealth.
Which candidate is focused on raising GDP, and which on making everything left over more equal.
Quit the EZ offshoring - generate good jobs, and not swell the labor pool with millions that shouldn't be here to begin with.
Oh.and renegotiate/end shitty deals like NAFTA - and go back to bilateral trade agreement
No, you didn't really. Because that gap continues to grow. And that's a pretty sad reflection on supply side.
No, you didn't really. Because that gap continues to grow. And that's a pretty sad reflection on supply side.
How so?
Well since BO is not supposed to be a fan of supply side, how is it that this gap expanded so much quicker on his watch ?
wut. if you look at the stats the income for the very rich and the income for the very poor have been increasing dramitcally worldwide.
Now most if not all of america is in the middle so it hasnt helped them much but those supporting clinton and globalization should absolutely love trickle down.
Can you give me any stats that show the income for the very poor worldwide has not increased dramatically?
That defies liberal understanding of economics. They think that there is a finite pool of wealth, and therefore there are rich at the expense of the poor.
OK fine. But it's still crap. without a viable middle class you wind up with oligarchs and povertyyes but trickle down is "working" as designed. Its unfair to say it is not when it was never meant to help people in the middle
I should have qualified: sad for anyone who doesn't think that the gap between the very rich & the rest should grow as it has.
If you'd like to see wages stagnate for the majority of Americans will billionaires continue to grow their wealth, this is definitely a happy time.