Why China and Russia Fear America's New Ford-Class Aircraft Carriers

anatta

100% recycled karma
Why China and Russia Fear America's New Ford-Class Aircraft Carriers
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...a-fear-americas-new-ford-class-aircraft-19226
n 2009, the U.S. Navy finally began construction of the first new type of aircraft carrier in nearly thirty-five years. Named after former president and naval aviator Gerald R. Ford, the USS Ford fully takes the nuclear supercarrier into the twenty-first century. The technological innovations built into the new ship, while causing the inevitable delays involved in building a first-in-class vessel, will keep the Navy’s unique fleet of super flattops the largest and most advanced in the world for the foreseeable future.

USS Ford follows in the steps of the highly successful Nimitz-class carriers. Construction began in 2009 at Huntington Ingalls Industries in Newport News, Virginia—the same location where the Ford’s predecessors were built. Indeed, the Ford class resembles the Nimitz ships in many ways: they measure 1,106 feet long versus the Nimitz’s 1,092 feet. Both classes weigh the same: approximately one hundred thousand tons fully loaded. Layout is similar, too, with an island on the starboard side, four catapults and an angled flight deck.

The ship is powered by two new-design AB1 nuclear reactors. The reactors are manufactured by Bechtel, which beat out longtime naval reactor giants General Electric and Westinghouse for the reactor contract. Together, the two reactors create six hundred megawatts of electricity, triple the two hundred megawatts of the Nimitz class. That’s enough electricity to power every home in Hampton, Virginia; Pasadena, California; or Syracuse, New York.

Ford is going to need that power, not only to reach its estimated top speed of thirty-plus knots but also the new Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS), which uses electric currents to generate strong magnetic fields that can quickly accelerate an aircraft to takeoff speeds. The system is touted as easier on aircraft, extending their service lives, easier to maintain in general and capable of generating up to 25 percent more sorties than the older steam catapult system.

The new carrier will also use a new system to land aircraft. The new Advanced Arresting Gear uses a water turbine and induction motors to halt the momentum of landing carrier aircraft. Like EMALS, the AAG is expected to be more reliable than the existing aircraft arresting system on Nimitz-class ships and easier on airframes.

Ford will also have the most modern radar systems in the fleet. The Ford will have the new Dual Band Radar, which combines both the X-Band AN/SPY-3 Aegis radar and the S-Band Volume Surveillance Radar. DBR is capable of search, track and multiple missile illumination, detecting enemy aircraft and missiles and then guiding Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (ESSM) to intercept.

For self-defense, Ford will have two Mk. 29 missile launchers with eight ESSM each, and two Rolling Airframe Missile launchers. It will also have four Phalanx Close-In Weapon Systems for point defense against aircraft, missiles and small ships, and four M2 .50 caliber machine guns. Ford’s generous electrical capacity means that the ship could someday mount laser self-defense weapons. Powered by the ship’s nuclear reactors, such a system would have a virtually limitless ammunition supply, vastly increasing the ship’s defensive capability.

The carrier air wing will form the carrier’s primary means of deploying both offensive and defensive firepower. The Ford class will embark two squadrons of ten to twelve F-35C Joint Strike Fighters, two squadrons of ten to twelve F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, five EA-18G Growler electronic attack jets, four E-2D Hawkeye airborne early-warning and control aircraft, and two C-2 Greyhound carrier onboard delivery (COD) planes. It will also carry eight MH-60S Seahawk helicopters. Down the road, it will embark the MQ-25 Stingray refueling and intelligence collection drone, the eventual planned sixth-generation fighter to replace the Super Hornet, and, if Sen. John McCain has his way, a new long-range strike drone. The V-22 Osprey tiltrotor is also set to replace the C-2 Greyhound in the COD role.

Ford’s entry into active service will once again raise the Navy’s carrier force to eleven ships. The Navy’s carrier fleet is unique in having a congressionally mandated minimum force level: U.S. Code § 5062 states, “the naval combat forces of the Navy shall include not less than 11 operational aircraft carriers.” For, now the Navy is operating with a waiver.

More ships will follow. USS John F. Kennedy, the second aircraft carrier to bear the name of the thirty-fifth president of the United States, is under construction at Newport News and expected to enter service in 2020. The third carrier, Enterprise, is expected to begin construction next year and will join the fleet in the early 2020s. The current push by President Donald Trump and the chief of naval operations to a 350–355-ship fleet will likely include at least one additional Ford-class carrier in the near term.

Designed with the latest technology, Ford is not without problems. Both EMALS and the Advanced Arresting Gear System have run into considerable problems, and the Navy briefly pondered finishing Kennedy with a more traditional, proven arresting gear system. Despite developmental delays, it appears both new takeoff and landing systems are nearly ready. According to the Navy, Ford is 99 percent done and 93 percent of testing is complete. Ford is scheduled for delivery to the Navy this April.
 
from everything ive seen china has already written off the sea in case of a conflict with the US. With or without the aircraft carrier.
 
http://thediplomat.com/2017/07/are-...ive-economic-zones-soon-to-be-a-fact-of-life/

On Saturday, a Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) Type 815 Dongdiao-class auxiliary general intelligence (AGI) ship monitored joint exercises between the United States and Australia as part of the ongoing Talisman Sabre exercise...

What’s notable with this recent incident is that it comes just shortly after another Type 815 AGI, the Tianlangxing, surveilled a recent U.S. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile test off the coast of Alaska earlier in July
Unofficially, however, both Canberra and Washington do worry about the PLAN’s increasing confidence as an expeditionary navy,
 
The American military-welfare state is the most inefficient, most wasteful, biggest boondoggle probably in the history of the human species.

Although I can understand why this appeals to the fantasies of NeoCons and military welfarists.

While I cannot claim to be a military expert, I know enough military history to know the United States is always building weapons suited for the last war.
I am not so sure the era of the gi-nourmous aircraft carrier is a sound strategy, or if its just another money sink for the Military Welfare State.

We saw in the Falklands war that one cheap, French air to surface missile could take out a capital ship. The Chinese, and the Russian in particular, have a history of innovative development of rocket and missile technology. And it would not surprise me that in a decade or two, this 12 billion dollar Pentagon monstrosity will be rendered obsolete by development in unmanned missile and drone technology. But, I could be wrong!
 
The American military-welfare state is the most inefficient, most wasteful, biggest boondoggle probably in the history of the human species.

Although I can understand why this appeals to the fantasies of NeoCons and military welfarists.

While I cannot claim to be a military expert, I know enough military history to know the United States is always building weapons suited for the last war.
I am not so sure the era of the gi-nourmous aircraft carrier is a sound strategy, or if its just another money sink for the Military Welfare State.

We saw in the Falklands war that one cheap, French air to surface missile could take out a capital ship. The Chinese, and the Russian in particular, have a history of innovative development of rocket and missile technology. And it would not surprise me that in a decade or two, this 12 billion dollar Pentagon monstrosity will be rendered obsolete by development in unmanned missile and drone technology. But, I could be wrong!

i dont think missiles will kill carrier battle groups.

That said it is already one more CBG in an area where the US aready has a massive advantage.

The weakness of the US in the military field is that it cant sustain massive casualties. The chinese and russians can lose a million mn without blinking an eye. The US govt would be overthrown if that ever happened. I think the US should develop robot foot soldiers or something like that.
 
i dont think missiles will kill carrier battle groups.

That said it is already one more CBG in an area where the US aready has a massive advantage.

The weakness of the US in the military field is that it cant sustain massive casualties. The chinese and russians can lose a million mn without blinking an eye. The US govt would be overthrown if that ever happened. I think the US should develop robot foot soldiers or something like that.

You undoubtedly thought the invasion of Iraq was a great idea, and you were a cheerleader and supporter of it throughout George Dumbya Bush's tenure. Your Iraq War Diaster is arguably, the stupidest, most foolish, and most catastrophically bad military decision in modern American history. .

So with that backdrop on your resume, consider your post unread, because your opinion on military decisions is worthless.
 
Why China and Russia Fear America's New Ford-Class Aircraft Carriers
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...a-fear-americas-new-ford-class-aircraft-19226
n 2009, the U.S. Navy finally began construction of the first new type of aircraft carrier in nearly thirty-five years. Named after former president and naval aviator Gerald R. Ford, the USS Ford fully takes the nuclear supercarrier into the twenty-first century. The technological innovations built into the new ship, while causing the inevitable delays involved in building a first-in-class vessel, will keep the Navy’s unique fleet of super flattops the largest and most advanced in the world for the foreseeable future.

USS Ford follows in the steps of the highly successful Nimitz-class carriers. Construction began in 2009 at Huntington Ingalls Industries in Newport News, Virginia—the same location where the Ford’s predecessors were built. Indeed, the Ford class resembles the Nimitz ships in many ways: they measure 1,106 feet long versus the Nimitz’s 1,092 feet. Both classes weigh the same: approximately one hundred thousand tons fully loaded. Layout is similar, too, with an island on the starboard side, four catapults and an angled flight deck.

The ship is powered by two new-design AB1 nuclear reactors. The reactors are manufactured by Bechtel, which beat out longtime naval reactor giants General Electric and Westinghouse for the reactor contract. Together, the two reactors create six hundred megawatts of electricity, triple the two hundred megawatts of the Nimitz class. That’s enough electricity to power every home in Hampton, Virginia; Pasadena, California; or Syracuse, New York.

Ford is going to need that power, not only to reach its estimated top speed of thirty-plus knots but also the new Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS), which uses electric currents to generate strong magnetic fields that can quickly accelerate an aircraft to takeoff speeds. The system is touted as easier on aircraft, extending their service lives, easier to maintain in general and capable of generating up to 25 percent more sorties than the older steam catapult system.

The new carrier will also use a new system to land aircraft. The new Advanced Arresting Gear uses a water turbine and induction motors to halt the momentum of landing carrier aircraft. Like EMALS, the AAG is expected to be more reliable than the existing aircraft arresting system on Nimitz-class ships and easier on airframes.

Ford will also have the most modern radar systems in the fleet. The Ford will have the new Dual Band Radar, which combines both the X-Band AN/SPY-3 Aegis radar and the S-Band Volume Surveillance Radar. DBR is capable of search, track and multiple missile illumination, detecting enemy aircraft and missiles and then guiding Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (ESSM) to intercept.

For self-defense, Ford will have two Mk. 29 missile launchers with eight ESSM each, and two Rolling Airframe Missile launchers. It will also have four Phalanx Close-In Weapon Systems for point defense against aircraft, missiles and small ships, and four M2 .50 caliber machine guns. Ford’s generous electrical capacity means that the ship could someday mount laser self-defense weapons. Powered by the ship’s nuclear reactors, such a system would have a virtually limitless ammunition supply, vastly increasing the ship’s defensive capability.

The carrier air wing will form the carrier’s primary means of deploying both offensive and defensive firepower. The Ford class will embark two squadrons of ten to twelve F-35C Joint Strike Fighters, two squadrons of ten to twelve F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, five EA-18G Growler electronic attack jets, four E-2D Hawkeye airborne early-warning and control aircraft, and two C-2 Greyhound carrier onboard delivery (COD) planes. It will also carry eight MH-60S Seahawk helicopters. Down the road, it will embark the MQ-25 Stingray refueling and intelligence collection drone, the eventual planned sixth-generation fighter to replace the Super Hornet, and, if Sen. John McCain has his way, a new long-range strike drone. The V-22 Osprey tiltrotor is also set to replace the C-2 Greyhound in the COD role.

Ford’s entry into active service will once again raise the Navy’s carrier force to eleven ships. The Navy’s carrier fleet is unique in having a congressionally mandated minimum force level: U.S. Code § 5062 states, “the naval combat forces of the Navy shall include not less than 11 operational aircraft carriers.” For, now the Navy is operating with a waiver.

More ships will follow. USS John F. Kennedy, the second aircraft carrier to bear the name of the thirty-fifth president of the United States, is under construction at Newport News and expected to enter service in 2020. The third carrier, Enterprise, is expected to begin construction next year and will join the fleet in the early 2020s. The current push by President Donald Trump and the chief of naval operations to a 350–355-ship fleet will likely include at least one additional Ford-class carrier in the near term.

Designed with the latest technology, Ford is not without problems. Both EMALS and the Advanced Arresting Gear System have run into considerable problems, and the Navy briefly pondered finishing Kennedy with a more traditional, proven arresting gear system. Despite developmental delays, it appears both new takeoff and landing systems are nearly ready. According to the Navy, Ford is 99 percent done and 93 percent of testing is complete. Ford is scheduled for delivery to the Navy this April.

The Ford is not one bit more dangerous to the enemy than existing carriers......................

Next
 
Back
Top