Who is the comrade? Ted Kennedy's Soviet Gambit

Picking his way through the Soviet archives that Boris Yeltsin had just thrown open, in 1991 Tim Sebastian, a reporter for the London Times, came across an arresting memorandum. Composed in 1983 by Victor Chebrikov, the top man at the KGB, the memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy.

“On 9-10 May of this year,” the May 14 memorandum explained, “Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow.” (Tunney was Kennedy’s law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) “The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.”

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. “The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations,” the memorandum stated. “These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.”

Kennedy made Andropov a couple of specific offers.

First he offered to visit Moscow. “The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.” Kennedy would help the Soviets deal with Reagan by telling them how to brush up their propaganda.

Then he offered to make it possible for Andropov to sit down for a few interviews on American television. “A direct appeal … to the American people will, without a doubt, attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country. … If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interviews. … The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.”

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/te...eagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.html
 
Doesn't mean this is not true. If true, this is worse than Trump.
evaluate the message:
Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election
this wouldmake Keenedy a traitor larger then Benedict Arnold..for what ? electoral politics?

I mean you can't just look at scraps of paper - or conspiracy theories without also pushing back on them.
If word EVER got out on this -it would be catastrophic ,so the RISKS to Kennedy would be career ending/traitorous .
I she gona do that for an election?
 
Two things...

You have no proof it is true.

Kennedy isn't running for President.

NEXT!

There is more proof than your claim of right wing TERRORISM and Republican Racism Front and Center.

But I do like how you immediately claim it is no big deal that a dem might have asked Russia for help.
 
evaluate the message:
this wouldmake Keenedy a traitor larger then Benedict Arnold..for what ? electoral politics?

I mean you can't just look at scraps of paper - or conspiracy theories without also pushing back on them.
If word EVER got out on this -it would be catastrophic ,so the RISKS to Kennedy would be career ending/traitorous .
I she gona do that for an election?

Perhaps he thought it would never come to light.
 
usually disinformation campaigns were made public....was the goal here to disinform the inside of a file cabinet?.....

it was a memo for a likely disinformation campaign - not all of them are actually implemented -probably much less then most.
To believe otherwise is to believe Kennedy was actively seeking a traitorous act.
 
it was a memo for a likely disinformation campaign - not all of them are actually implemented -probably much less then most.
To believe otherwise is to believe Kennedy was actively seeking a traitorous act.
But you don't know for sure.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
There is more proof than your claim of right wing TERRORISM and Republican Racism Front and Center.

But I do like how you immediately claim it is no big deal that a dem might have asked Russia for help.

I never said it was no big deal.

Are you incapable of quoting me accurately or are you just ignorant?
 
I never said it was no big deal.

Are you incapable of quoting me accurately or are you just ignorant?
Oh, here we go again with the ridiculous lies. You totally dismissed it and even said Next!

You have made claims with zero evidence, but when you do it you want people to take you seriously.

Why the double standard?

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top