White House Says Virginia Giuffre Is the Unnamed ‘Victim’ in Epstein Emails About Trump WHOOPS

volsrocks

Verified User
The ‘unnamed victim’ referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and ‘couldn’t have been friendlier’ to her in their limited interactions,” Leavitt wrote in a statement to TIME.



WHOOPS

So this victim in the email that was released and causing the Dims to jerk off all over.... is a girl on record stating Trump DID NOTHING WRONG

:magagrin:
 
Is it true that the name was redacted by Democrats?

Yes, the redaction occurred under the Democrat-led Oversight Committee’s process, as per the released records and failing New York Times reporting.

The victim’s name was redacted by the Democrat-led committee, and it is indeed the late Virginia Giuffre, whose identity was already publicly unmasked.

On July 2, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ordered the gradual unsealing of documents, including those identifying Giuffre as a victim and her allegations against Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The first batch of these documents was released on August 9, 2019, fully disclosing her identity.

Given that Giuffre’s identity is already public, the decision to redact her name in this specific email raises questions about intent.

Since Giuffre is no longer alive, the usual concerns about protecting a living victim’s privacy or safety are diminished.
 
The ‘unnamed victim’ referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and ‘couldn’t have been friendlier’ to her in their limited interactions,” Leavitt wrote in a statement to TIME.



WHOOPS

So this victim in the email that was released and causing the Dims to jerk off all over.... is a girl on record stating Trump DID NOTHING WRONG

:magagrin:
This sure blows up in the Dems face. Could they ever appear more desperate? Hey Trump crushed us on the Schumer shutdown so look over here at this shiny object.

:magagrin:
 
I suppose the Democrats figured their base is too lazy to check the facts when it suits 'em, or too retarded to care.
 
I suppose the Democrats figured their base is too lazy to check the facts when it suits 'em, or too retarded to care.
I'd say they generally are right about that.... but I'd say that other than folks plugged into politics, like the folks that post here, none are even close to paying this kind of attention to details.
 
I'd say they generally are right about that.... but I'd say that other than folks plugged into politics, like the folks that post here, are even close to paying this kind of attention to details.

Concur. The laziness and general willingness to just accept whatever "their side's" approved news outlets say is bipartisan.
 
Jasmine Crockett gets called out live by CNN for Democrats redacting Epstein documents to try to smear President Trump with their fake narrative.

CNN: " She did not accuse [Trump] of any wrongdoing."

Crockett: " I don't know why they would necessarily redact someone's name who is deceased at this point."

CNN: "The Democrats redacted."

Crockett: **gibberish cover-up attempt**


View: https://x.com/GOPoversight/status/1988712900970578080?t=INPXXyTDCySVtJfIkX55ZQ&s=19
 
Nothing about Epstein can or could be believed going back to the first day he was in prison.

Democrat Shills have controlled access to all of the files and data for more than enough time to hide any Democrat involvement, and plant plenty of fake evidence for those they oppose.

Anything Epstein has no validity.

-
 
It is sad that a couple dozen or so young girls had to suffer and die so that the Dems and Chinese could play gotcha peccadillo politics.

No one believes anything Epstein.


-
 
Back
Top